• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区导航员研究:一项可行性随机对照试验,旨在开展一项干预措施,以增强患有复杂焦虑症或抑郁症的人群的社区联系并减少其孤独感。

The Community Navigator Study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase community connections and reduce loneliness for people with complex anxiety or depression.

作者信息

Lloyd-Evans Brynmor, Bone Jessica K, Pinfold Vanessa, Lewis Glyn, Billings Jo, Frerichs Johanna, Fullarton Kate, Jones Rebecca, Johnson Sonia

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

The McPin Foundation, London, SE1 0EH, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Oct 23;18(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2226-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2226-7
PMID:29061185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5654042/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loneliness is associated with poor health outcomes at all ages, including shorter life expectancy and greater risk of developing depression. People with mental health problems are particularly vulnerable to loneliness and, for those with anxiety or depression, loneliness is associated with poorer outcomes. Interventions which support people to utilise existing networks and access new social contact are advocated in policy but there is little evidence regarding their effectiveness. People with mental health problems have potential to benefit from interventions to reduce loneliness, but evidence is needed regarding their feasibility, acceptability and outcomes. An intervention to reduce loneliness for people with anxiety or depression treated in secondary mental health services was developed for this study, which will test the feasibility and acceptability of delivering and evaluating it through a randomised controlled trial.

METHODS

In this feasibility trial, 40 participants with anxiety or depression will be recruited through two secondary mental health services in London and randomised to an intervention (n = 30) or control group (n = 10). The control group will receive standard care and written information about local community resources. The coproduced intervention, developed in this study, includes up to ten sessions with a 'Community Navigator' over a 6-month period. Community Navigators will work with people individually to increase involvement in social activities, with the aim of reducing feelings of loneliness. Data will be collected at baseline and at 6-month follow-up - the end of the intervention period. The acceptability of the intervention and feasibility of participant recruitment and retention will be assessed. Potential primary and secondary outcomes for a future definitive trial will be completed to assess response and completeness, including measures of loneliness, depression and anxiety. Qualitative interviews with participants, staff and other stakeholders will explore experiences of Community Navigator support, the mechanisms by which it may have its effects and suggestions for improving the programme.

DISCUSSION

Our trial will provide preliminary evidence of the feasibility and acceptability of Community Navigator support and of trial procedures for testing this. The results will inform a future definitive randomised controlled trial of this intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN10771821 . Registered on 3 April 2017.

摘要

背景

孤独与各年龄段人群的健康状况不佳有关,包括预期寿命缩短和患抑郁症的风险增加。有心理健康问题的人尤其容易感到孤独,对于那些患有焦虑症或抑郁症的人来说,孤独与更差的结果相关。政策提倡采取干预措施,支持人们利用现有社交网络并建立新的社会联系,但几乎没有证据表明这些措施的有效性。有心理健康问题的人有可能从减少孤独感的干预措施中受益,但需要有关其可行性、可接受性和效果的证据。本研究针对在二级心理健康服务机构接受治疗的焦虑症或抑郁症患者开发了一种减少孤独感的干预措施,并将通过随机对照试验来测试实施和评估该措施的可行性和可接受性。

方法

在这项可行性试验中,将通过伦敦的两家二级心理健康服务机构招募40名患有焦虑症或抑郁症的参与者,并将其随机分为干预组(n = 30)或对照组(n = 10)。对照组将接受标准护理以及关于当地社区资源的书面信息。本研究中共同制定的干预措施包括在6个月内与一名“社区导航员”进行多达十次的会面。社区导航员将与人们单独合作,以增加他们对社交活动的参与度,目的是减少孤独感。将在基线和6个月随访时(干预期结束时)收集数据。将评估干预措施的可接受性以及参与者招募和留存的可行性。将完成未来确定性试验的潜在主要和次要结局评估,以评估反应情况和完整性,包括孤独感、抑郁和焦虑的测量指标。对参与者、工作人员和其他利益相关者进行定性访谈,将探讨社区导航员支持的体验、其可能产生效果的机制以及改进该计划的建议。

讨论

我们的试验将为社区导航员支持的可行性和可接受性以及测试该支持的试验程序提供初步证据。研究结果将为该干预措施未来的确定性随机对照试验提供参考。

试验注册

ISRCTN10771821。于2017年4月3日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a80/5654042/7bd302d7ddb7/13063_2017_2226_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a80/5654042/7bd302d7ddb7/13063_2017_2226_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a80/5654042/7bd302d7ddb7/13063_2017_2226_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Community Navigator Study: a feasibility randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase community connections and reduce loneliness for people with complex anxiety or depression.社区导航员研究:一项可行性随机对照试验,旨在开展一项干预措施,以增强患有复杂焦虑症或抑郁症的人群的社区联系并减少其孤独感。
Trials. 2017 Oct 23;18(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2226-7.
2
The Community Navigator Study: Results from a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a programme to reduce loneliness for people with complex anxiety or depression.社区导航员研究:一项旨在减少复杂焦虑或抑郁人群孤独感的方案的可行性随机对照试验结果。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233535. eCollection 2020.
3
Randomised controlled trial of the Community Navigator programme to reduce loneliness and depression for adults with treatment-resistant depression in secondary community mental health services: trial protocol.社区导航员方案随机对照试验,以减少二级社区精神卫生服务中治疗抵抗性抑郁症成人的孤独和抑郁:试验方案。
Trials. 2023 Oct 6;24(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07684-4.
4
A feasibility study for NOn-Traditional providers to support the management of Elderly People with Anxiety and Depression: The NOTEPAD study Protocol.非传统医疗服务提供者支持老年焦虑症和抑郁症管理的可行性研究:NOTEPAD研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 7;19(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2550-6.
5
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.
6
Acceptance and commitment therapy for older people with treatment-resistant generalised anxiety disorder: the FACTOID feasibility study.接受和承诺疗法治疗治疗抵抗的老年广泛性焦虑障碍:FACTOID 可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Sep;25(54):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta25540.
7
Feasibility and acceptability of group music therapy vs wait-list control for treatment of patients with long-term depression (the SYNCHRONY trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.团体音乐疗法与等待列表对照治疗长期抑郁症患者的可行性和可接受性(同步试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Mar 29;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1893-8.
8
The effects of a brief CBT intervention, delivered by frontline mental health staff, to promote recovery in people with psychosis and comorbid anxiety or depression (the GOALS study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.由一线心理健康工作人员提供的简短认知行为疗法干预对促进精神病合并焦虑或抑郁患者康复的效果(目标研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Jun 27;15:255. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-255.
9
Metacognitive therapy home-based self-help for cardiac rehabilitation patients experiencing anxiety and depressive symptoms: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (PATHWAY Home-MCT).针对有焦虑和抑郁症状的心脏康复患者的基于家庭自助的元认知疗法:一项可行性随机对照试验(PATHWAY家庭-元认知疗法)的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 16;19(1):444. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2826-x.
10
Behavioural activation therapy for post-stroke depression: the BEADS feasibility RCT.行为激活疗法治疗脑卒中后抑郁:BEADS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(47):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23470.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing the mental health needs of older adult refugees: Perspectives of multi-sector community key informants.满足老年难民的心理健康需求:多部门社区关键信息提供者的观点。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2023 Jun;3. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100269. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
2
Implementing Asset-Based Integrated Care: A Tale of Two Localities.实施基于资产的综合护理:两个地区的故事。
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Nov 17;21(4):19. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5621. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
3
Influences on participation in a programme addressing loneliness among people with depression and anxiety: findings from the Community Navigator Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Social isolation in mental health: a conceptual and methodological review.心理健康中的社会隔离:概念与方法综述
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;52(12):1451-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1446-1. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
2
A life less lonely: the state of the art in interventions to reduce loneliness in people with mental health problems.少些孤独的生活:减少有心理健康问题者孤独感的干预措施的最新进展
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;52(6):627-638. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1392-y. Epub 2017 May 20.
3
Social interventions in mental health: a call to action.
影响参与抑郁和焦虑人群孤独问题计划的因素:社区导航员研究的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 26;20(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02961-x.
4
Development of a comprehensive inventory of community participation for individuals with psychiatric disabilities.开发针对精神残疾个体的全面社区参与清单。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2021 Mar;44(1):51-62. doi: 10.1037/prj0000450. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
5
The Community Navigator Study: Results from a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a programme to reduce loneliness for people with complex anxiety or depression.社区导航员研究:一项旨在减少复杂焦虑或抑郁人群孤独感的方案的可行性随机对照试验结果。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233535. eCollection 2020.
6
Development of a peer-led, network mapping intervention to improve the health of individuals with severe mental illnesses: protocol for a pilot study.同伴主导的网络绘图干预措施改善严重精神疾病患者健康状况的发展:一项试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 29;9(6):e023768. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023768.
7
The emotional labour of boundary spanning.跨越边界的情感劳动。
J Integr Care (Brighton). 2017;25(4):288-300. doi: 10.1108/JICA-04-2017-0008.
心理健康方面的社会干预:行动呼吁。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;52(3):245-247. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1360-6. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Groups 4 Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health.群组 4 健康:一项构建和增强社会群体成员身份的社会认同干预措施可改善心理健康的证据。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Apr;194:188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
5
Loneliness as a public health issue: the impact of loneliness on health care utilization among older adults.孤独作为一个公共卫生问题:孤独对老年人医疗保健利用的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):1013-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302427. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
6
Social change and birth cohort increase in loneliness among Chinese older adults: a cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1995-2011.社会变革与中国老年人孤独感的出生队列增加:1995 - 2011年的跨期元分析
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Nov;26(11):1773-81. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000921. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
7
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 声明:定义临床试验的标准议定书项目。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
8
Patient and public involvement in the coproduction of knowledge: reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study.患者和公众参与知识共创:对一项心理健康研究中定性数据分析的反思。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Aug;22(8):1126-37. doi: 10.1177/1049732312448541. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
Feelings of loneliness among adults with mental disorder.成年人的孤独感:精神障碍人群的孤独感
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;48(1):5-13. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0515-8. Epub 2012 May 9.
10
Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: a national longitudinal study.孤独感、健康与老年人的死亡率:一项全国性纵向研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Mar;74(6):907-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.028. Epub 2012 Jan 25.