• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价中统计学显著性与发表时间之间的关联:一项Meta流行病学调查的研究方案

Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.

作者信息

Tsujimoto Yasushi, Tsutsumi Yusuke, Kataoka Yuki, Tsujimoto Hiraku, Yamamoto Yosuke, Papola Davide, Guyatt Gordon H, Fukuhara Shunichi, Furukawa Toshi A

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Kyoritsu Hospital, Kawanishi, Hyogo, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e018856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018856.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018856
PMID:29061634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5665249/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many studies have indicated the impact of bias in dissemination and publication in medical research. Existence of such bias among clinical trials has been repeatedly pointed out, but it has not been well studied in the field of systematic reviews (SRs). We therefore aim to investigate whether or not time lag bias and publication bias in SRs based on statistical significance in results exist. In addition, we will examine at what stage of paper publication process such bias, if any, creeps in.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

The present study is a meta-epidemiological study. We will include all SRs of interventions registered in the international prospective register of SRs (PROSPERO) before December 2014 if the SR has completed its analysis irrespective of its publication status. All contact authors of eligible SRs will be asked to participate in a survey administered through the Internet. Our primary outcome is time from protocol registration to full publication of SR as a journal article, defined as time from the registration date to the acceptance date among all the relevant SRs. We will examine the impact of statistically significant findings on the primary outcomes through time to event analyses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval will be obtained from the Ethical Committee of the Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine. This protocol has been registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and also may present them at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000028325.

摘要

引言

许多研究表明了医学研究中传播和发表偏倚的影响。临床试验中此类偏倚的存在已被反复指出,但在系统评价(SR)领域尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们旨在调查基于结果统计显著性的SR中是否存在时间滞后偏倚和发表偏倚。此外,我们将研究在论文发表过程的哪个阶段会出现此类偏倚(如果存在的话)。

方法与分析

本研究是一项元流行病学研究。如果SR已完成分析,无论其发表状态如何,我们将纳入2014年12月之前在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(PROSPERO)中注册的所有干预措施的SR。将要求符合条件的SR的所有通讯作者参与通过互联网进行的调查。我们的主要结局是从方案注册到SR作为期刊文章完全发表的时间,定义为所有相关SR中从注册日期到接受日期的时间。我们将通过事件时间分析来研究具有统计学显著性的结果对主要结局的影响。

伦理与传播

将获得京都大学医学研究生院伦理委员会的伦理批准。本方案已在大学医院医疗信息网络临床试验注册库中注册。我们将在同行评审期刊上发表我们的研究结果,也可能在会议上展示。

试验注册号

UMIN000028325。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c9/5665249/d3ab4e99c872/bmjopen-2017-018856f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c9/5665249/62cd1359c6b8/bmjopen-2017-018856f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c9/5665249/d3ab4e99c872/bmjopen-2017-018856f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c9/5665249/62cd1359c6b8/bmjopen-2017-018856f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c9/5665249/d3ab4e99c872/bmjopen-2017-018856f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.系统评价中统计学显著性与发表时间之间的关联:一项Meta流行病学调查的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e018856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018856.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.针对同一外科主题的冗余系统评价:一项荟萃流行病学调查的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e017411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017411.
4
Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study.未发表的系统评价与资金支持:一项元流行病学研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 6;10(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3043-5.
5
Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study.非 Cochrane 系统评价中,统计学意义并不影响发表时间:一项荟萃流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;115:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
6
Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.评价 PROSPERO 记录特征对非 Cochrane 系统评价最终发表的预测作用:一项meta 流行病学研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 9;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0709-6.
7
Investigation of Risk Of Bias due to Unreported and SelecTively included results in meta-analyses of nutrition research: the ROBUST study protocol.营养研究荟萃分析中因未报告和选择性纳入结果导致的偏倚风险调查:ROBUST研究方案
F1000Res. 2019 Oct 16;8:1760. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.20726.2. eCollection 2019.
8
A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.对 2012 年至 2017 年发表在开放同行评议期刊上的系统评价方案的特征和同行评议过程进行描述性分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 13;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0698-8.
9
Assessing bias in osteoarthritis trials included in Cochrane reviews: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study.评估Cochrane系统评价中骨关节炎试验的偏倚:一项元流行病学研究方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 3;4(10):e005491. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005491.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Do good things really come to those who wait? An analysis of the average time of acceptance in Brazilian surgery journals.做好事真的会有好报吗?巴西外科杂志接受时间的平均分析。
Acta Cir Bras. 2024 Jul 22;39:e393824. doi: 10.1590/acb393824. eCollection 2024.
2
Publication Non Grata: The Challenge of Publishing Non-COVID-19 Research in the COVID Era.不受欢迎的出版物:新冠疫情时代发表非新冠研究的挑战
Cureus. 2020 Nov 9;12(11):e11403. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11403.
3
Investigating the rigour of research findings in experimental studies assessing the effects of breaking up prolonged sitting - extended scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Unpublished systematic reviews and financial support: a meta-epidemiological study.未发表的系统评价与资金支持:一项元流行病学研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 6;10(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3043-5.
2
Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.一项元流行病学研究表明,发表在高影响力期刊上的大多数系统评价都未对研究方案进行注册。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;84:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described.
调查评估打破长时间久坐影响的实验研究中研究结果的严谨性——扩展范围的综述研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 Jan-Feb;25(1):4-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 15.
4
Notoginsenoside R1 for Organs Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: A Preclinical Systematic Review.三七皂苷R1用于器官缺血/再灌注损伤:一项临床前系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Oct 17;10:1204. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01204. eCollection 2019.
5
Oral Adjuvant Curcumin Therapy for Attaining Clinical Remission in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.口服姜黄素辅助治疗溃疡性结肠炎达到临床缓解:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2018 Nov 12;10(11):1737. doi: 10.3390/nu10111737.
描述了在荟萃分析中检测、量化和调整发表偏倚的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;80:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
4
The importance of PROSPERO to the National Institute for Health Research.PROSPERO 对国家卫生研究所的重要性。
Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 9;1:5. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-5.
5
Factors predicting completion and time to publication of Cochrane reviews.预测Cochrane系统评价完成情况及发表时间的因素。
Open Med. 2009;3(4):e210-4. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
6
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.研究结果的传播和发表:相关偏倚的更新综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080.
7
An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.一项国际调查表明存在未发表的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):617-623.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.09.014. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
8
Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results.由于试验结果的统计学显著性或方向导致的临床试验中的发表偏倚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):MR000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3.
9
Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study.非Cochrane综述与Cochrane综述相比,得出肯定性结论陈述的可能性要高出一倍:横断面研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):380-386.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.008. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
10
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.系统评价的流行病学及报告特征
PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078.