Center for Bionic Medicine, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, 60610, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60610, USA.
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 23;7(1):13840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14386-w.
Recently commercialized powered prosthetic arm systems hold great potential in restoring function for people with upper-limb loss. However, effective use of such devices remains limited by conventional (direct) control methods, which rely on electromyographic signals produced from a limited set of muscles. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) is a nerve transfer procedure that creates additional recording sites for myoelectric prosthesis control. The effects of TMR may be enhanced when paired with pattern recognition technology. We sought to compare pattern recognition and direct control in eight transhumeral amputees who had TMR in a balanced randomized cross-over study. Subjects performed a 6-8 week home trial using direct and pattern recognition control with a custom prostheses made from commercially available parts. Subjects showed statistically better performance in the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (p = 0.04) and the Clothespin relocation task (p = 0.02). Notably, these tests required movements along 3 degrees of freedom. Seven of 8 subjects preferred pattern recognition control over direct control. This study was the first home trial large enough to establish clinical and statistical significance in comparing pattern recognition with direct control. Results demonstrate that pattern recognition is a viable option and has functional advantages over direct control.
最近商业化的动力假肢系统在恢复上肢截肢者的功能方面具有巨大的潜力。然而,这些设备的有效使用仍然受到传统(直接)控制方法的限制,这些方法依赖于从有限数量的肌肉产生的肌电图信号。靶向肌肉再支配(TMR)是一种神经转移手术,为肌电假肢控制创造了额外的记录部位。当与模式识别技术结合使用时,TMR 的效果可能会增强。我们试图在 8 名接受过 TMR 的 Transhumeral 截肢者中进行一项平衡随机交叉研究,比较模式识别和直接控制。受试者在家中使用定制的假肢进行了 6-8 周的直接和模式识别控制试验,该假肢由市售零件制成。受试者在手南安普顿评估程序(p = 0.04)和回形针重新定位任务(p = 0.02)中表现出统计学上更好的性能。值得注意的是,这些测试需要沿 3 个自由度进行运动。8 名受试者中有 7 名更喜欢模式识别控制而不是直接控制。这项研究是第一个足够大的家庭试验,足以在直接控制与模式识别的比较中建立临床和统计学意义。结果表明,模式识别是一种可行的选择,并且在功能上优于直接控制。