Sikar Hasan Ediz, Çetin Kenan, Eyvaz Kemal, Kaptanoglu Levent, Küçük Hasan Fehmi
Department of General Surgery, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Sep;12(3):245-250. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.68794. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
Suprapubic hernia is the term to describe ventral hernias located less than 4 cm above the pubic arch in the midline. Hernias with an upper margin above the arcuate line encounter technical difficulties, and the differences in repair methods forced us to define them as large suprapubic hernias.
To present our experience with laparoscopic repair of large suprapubic hernias that allows adequate mesh overlap.
Nineteen patients with suprapubic incisional hernias who underwent laparoscopic repair between May 2013 and January 2015 were included in the study. Patients with laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair who had a suprapubic hernia with an upper margin below the arcuate line were excluded.
Two men and 17 women, with a mean age of 58.2, underwent laparoscopic repair. Most of the incisions were midline vertical (13/68.4%). Twelve (63.1%) of the patients had previous incisional hernia repair (PIHR group); the mean number of previous incisional hernia repair was 1.4. Mean defect size of the PIHR group was higher than in patients without previous repair - 107.3 cm vs. 50.9 cm (p < 0.05). Mean operating time of the PIHR group was higher than in patients without repair - 126 min vs. 77.9 min (p < 0.05). Although all complications occurred in the PIHR group, there was no statistically significant difference.
Laparoscopic repair of large suprapubic hernias can be considered as the first option in treatment. The low recurrence rates reported in the literature and the lack of recurrence, as observed in our study, support this view.
耻骨上疝是指描述位于耻骨弓上方中线处小于4厘米的腹侧疝。疝的上缘位于弓状线以上会遇到技术难题,并且修复方法的差异促使我们将其定义为大型耻骨上疝。
介绍我们采用腹腔镜修复大型耻骨上疝并实现足够补片重叠的经验。
本研究纳入了2013年5月至2015年1月间接受腹腔镜修复的19例耻骨上切口疝患者。排除了接受腹腔镜腹膜外修复且耻骨上疝上缘位于弓状线以下的患者。
2名男性和17名女性接受了腹腔镜修复,平均年龄为58.2岁。大多数切口为中线垂直切口(13/68.4%)。12例(63.1%)患者曾接受过切口疝修复(PIHR组);既往切口疝修复的平均次数为1.4次。PIHR组的平均缺损大小高于未接受过修复的患者——107.3平方厘米对50.9平方厘米(p<0.05)。PIHR组的平均手术时间高于未接受修复的患者——126分钟对77.9分钟(p<0.05)。尽管所有并发症均发生在PIHR组,但差异无统计学意义。
腹腔镜修复大型耻骨上疝可被视为治疗的首选方法。文献报道的低复发率以及我们研究中观察到的无复发现象支持了这一观点。