Max Institute of Laproscopic, Endoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Max Hospital, Delhi, India.
MAX Institute of GI, Bariatric, Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, MAX Super Speciality Hospital, Dwarka, Delhi, 110075, India.
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1511-1523. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03062-4. Epub 2024 May 9.
While research on inguinal hernias is well-documented, ventral/incisional hernias still require investigation. In India, opinions on laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) techniques are contested. The current consensus aims to standardize LVHR practice and identify gaps and unfulfilled demands that compromise patient safety and therapeutic outcomes.
Using the modified Delphi technique, panel of 14 experts (general surgeons) came to a consensus. Two rounds of consensus were conducted online. An advisory board meeting was held for the third round, wherein survey results were discussed and the final statements were decided with supporting clinical evidence.
Experts recommended intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus/trans-abdominal retromuscular/extended totally extraperitoneal/mini- or less-open sublay operation/transabdominal preperitoneal/trans-abdominal partial extra-peritoneal/subcutaneous onlay laparoscopic approach/laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty as valid minimal access surgery (MAS) options for ventral hernia (VH). Intraperitoneal repair technique is the preferred MAS procedure for primary umbilical hernia < 4 cm without diastasis; incisional hernia in the presence of a vertical single midline incision; symptomatic hernia, BMI > 40 kg/m, and defect up to 4 cm; and for MAS VH surgery with grade 3/4 American Society of Anaesthesiologists. IPOM plus is the preferred MAS procedure for midline incisional hernia of width < 4 cm in patients with a previous laparotomy. Extraperitoneal repair technique is the preferred MAS procedure for L3 hernia < 4 cm; midline hernias < 4 cm with diastasis; and M5 hernia.
The consensus statements will help standardize LVHR practices, improve decision-making, and provide guidance on MAS in VHR in the Indian scenario.
腹股沟疝的研究已有大量文献记载,但仍需研究腹侧/切口疝。在印度,腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术(LVHR)技术的观点存在争议。目前的共识旨在规范 LVHR 实践,并确定影响患者安全和治疗效果的差距和未满足的需求。
使用改良 Delphi 技术,由 14 名专家(普通外科医生)组成专家组达成共识。进行了两轮在线共识。在第三轮中举行了顾问委员会会议,讨论了调查结果,并根据临床证据决定了最终陈述。
专家推荐腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)加/经腹腔后肌(retromuscular)/经腹完全腹膜外/迷你或更小的开放式下置修补术/经腹腹膜前/经腹腔部分腹膜外/皮下补片修补术/腹腔镜内直肌前鞘修补术作为腹侧疝(VH)的有效微创外科(MAS)选择。对于原发性脐疝<4cm 且无分离、垂直单一线切口存在的切口疝、有症状的疝、BMI>40kg/m2 且缺损<4cm 的患者,以及用于 MAS VH 手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 3/4 的患者,腹腔内修复技术是首选的 MAS 手术。对于宽度<4cm 的中线切口疝和先前接受过剖腹手术的患者,IPOM 加是首选的 MAS 手术。对于 L3 疝<4cm、有分离的中线疝<4cm 和 M5 疝,腹膜外修复技术是首选的 MAS 手术。
共识陈述将有助于规范 LVHR 实践,改善决策,并为印度的 VH 中的 MAS 提供指导。