• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ventral hernia repair in India: a Delphi consensus.印度腹外疝修补术:德尔菲共识。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1511-1523. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03062-4. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Practice and short-term outcomes in ventral hernia repair: a prospective multicenter data audit of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons Research Collaborative.腹疝修补术的实践与短期疗效:印度胃肠内镜外科医生协会研究协作组的一项前瞻性多中心数据审计
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1573-1581. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02666-y. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
Mini- or less-open sublay (E/MILOS) operation vs open sublay and laparoscopic IPOM repair for the treatment of incisional hernias: a registry-based propensity score matched analysis of the 5-year results.微型或小切口下(sublay)修补术(E/MILOS)与开放式下(sublay)修补术和腹腔镜 IPOM 修复术治疗切口疝的 5 年疗效比较:基于注册的倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):179-190. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02847-3. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会(IEHS))-A 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) for ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis.腹腔镜下腹直肌前鞘修补术(LIRA)与腹腔内补片加强(IPOM plus)治疗腹壁疝的比较分析。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):167-177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02858-0. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
6
[Current robotic ventral hernia surgery exemplified by 50 consecutive patients].[以连续50例患者为例的当前机器人腹疝手术]
Chirurg. 2022 Jan;93(1):82-88. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01407-8. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
7
[Abdominal wall hernias part 2 : Operative treatment techniques].[腹壁疝 第2部分:手术治疗技术]
Chirurg. 2021 Aug;92(8):755-768. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01383-z. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
8
Mini- or Less-open Sublay Operation (MILOS): A New Minimally Invasive Technique for the Extraperitoneal Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernias.迷你或微创经腹侧入路手术(MILOS):一种用于切口疝腹膜外补片修复的新型微创技术。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):748-755. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002661.
9
S041-Trends and short-term outcomes of three approaches to minimally invasive repair of small ventral hernias. An ACHQC analysis.S041-三种微创修复小切口疝方法的趋势和短期结局。ACHQC 分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4885-4894. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09629-5. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
Laparoscopic Stapled Sublay Repair With Self-Gripping Mesh: A Simplified Technique for Minimally Invasive Extraperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair.使用自固定补片的腹腔镜钉合肌后间隙修补术:一种用于微创腹膜外腹疝修补的简化技术
Surg Technol Int. 2016 Oct 26;29:131-139.

引用本文的文献

1
Subxiphoid hernia, definition and repair: an international delphi consensus.剑突下疝的定义与修复:一项国际德尔菲共识
Hernia. 2025 Feb 28;29(1):108. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03289-9.
2
Comment to: Peritoneal flap technique for abdominal wall expansion in the management of complex ventral hernias.对《用于复杂腹壁疝处理中腹壁扩张的腹膜瓣技术》的评论
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):2043-2045. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03128-3. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
3
Tailoring our preoperative optimization and surgical strategy seems the key in managing the complex hernia patient.调整我们的术前优化措施和手术策略似乎是处理复杂疝患者的关键。
Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):663. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03058-0. Epub 2024 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of 'enhanced-view totally extra-peritoneal' (eTEP) approach for ventral hernia: Early results.腹疝“强化视野完全腹膜外”(eTEP)手术方法分析:早期结果
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jul-Sep;19(3):361-370. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_129_22.
2
Laparoscopic treatment of ventral hernias: the Italian national guidelines.腹腔镜治疗腹疝:意大利国家指南。
Updates Surg. 2023 Aug;75(5):1305-1336. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01534-3. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
Endoscopic Mini-or Less-Open Sublay Operation (E/MILOS) in ventral hernia repair: a minimally invasive alternative technique.内镜下微创或小切口经腹入路手术(E/MILOS)在腹疝修补术中的应用:一种微创的替代技术。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Mar 27;50:e20233405. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233405-en. eCollection 2023.
4
Can ventral TAPP achieve favorable outcomes in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹腹膜前补片修补术(TAPP)能否实现微创腹壁疝修补的良好效果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):729-739. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02709-4. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic hernioplasty with and without fascial repair (IPOM-Plus vs IPOM) for ventral hernia: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜下有无筋膜修复的腹疝修补术(IPOM-Plus与IPOM)结局比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Aug 1;80:104297. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104297. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
A Novel Modification of Subcutaneous Onlay Endoscopic Repair of Midline Ventral Hernias With Diastasis Recti: An Indian Experience.一种改良的皮下覆盖内镜下修复伴有腹直肌分离的中线腹疝的新方法:印度经验。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 16;14(6):e26004. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26004. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernia using a modified transabdominal partial extraperitoneal technique.经腹部分腹膜外改良技术腹腔镜修补耻骨上方切口疝。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Oct;15(4):872-876. doi: 10.1111/ases.13066. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
8
Comparing rates of bowel injury for laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair: a retrospective analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative.比较腹腔镜和机器人腹疝修补术的肠损伤率:腹部核心健康质量协作的回顾性分析。
Hernia. 2022 Oct;26(5):1251-1258. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02564-3. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
9
The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.eTEP 与 IPOM 在腹疝和切口疝修补中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jan 17;32(2):252-258. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035.
10
SUMMER Trial: mesh versus suture repair in small umbilical hernias in adults-a study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter clinical trial.SUMMER 试验:成人小型脐疝中网片与缝合修补的比较-一项前瞻性随机双盲多中心临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05366-7.

印度腹外疝修补术:德尔菲共识。

Ventral hernia repair in India: a Delphi consensus.

机构信息

Max Institute of Laproscopic, Endoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Max Hospital, Delhi, India.

MAX Institute of GI, Bariatric, Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, MAX Super Speciality Hospital, Dwarka, Delhi, 110075, India.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1511-1523. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03062-4. Epub 2024 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03062-4
PMID:38722399
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11449949/
Abstract

PURPOSE

While research on inguinal hernias is well-documented, ventral/incisional hernias still require investigation. In India, opinions on laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) techniques are contested. The current consensus aims to standardize LVHR practice and identify gaps and unfulfilled demands that compromise patient safety and therapeutic outcomes.

METHODS

Using the modified Delphi technique, panel of 14 experts (general surgeons) came to a consensus. Two rounds of consensus were conducted online. An advisory board meeting was held for the third round, wherein survey results were discussed and the final statements were decided with supporting clinical evidence.

RESULTS

Experts recommended intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus/trans-abdominal retromuscular/extended totally extraperitoneal/mini- or less-open sublay operation/transabdominal preperitoneal/trans-abdominal partial extra-peritoneal/subcutaneous onlay laparoscopic approach/laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty as valid minimal access surgery (MAS) options for ventral hernia (VH). Intraperitoneal repair technique is the preferred MAS procedure for primary umbilical hernia < 4 cm without diastasis; incisional hernia in the presence of a vertical single midline incision; symptomatic hernia, BMI > 40 kg/m, and defect up to 4 cm; and for MAS VH surgery with grade 3/4 American Society of Anaesthesiologists. IPOM plus is the preferred MAS procedure for midline incisional hernia of width < 4 cm in patients with a previous laparotomy. Extraperitoneal repair technique is the preferred MAS procedure for L3 hernia < 4 cm; midline hernias < 4 cm with diastasis; and M5 hernia.

CONCLUSION

The consensus statements will help standardize LVHR practices, improve decision-making, and provide guidance on MAS in VHR in the Indian scenario.

摘要

目的

腹股沟疝的研究已有大量文献记载,但仍需研究腹侧/切口疝。在印度,腹腔镜腹侧疝修补术(LVHR)技术的观点存在争议。目前的共识旨在规范 LVHR 实践,并确定影响患者安全和治疗效果的差距和未满足的需求。

方法

使用改良 Delphi 技术,由 14 名专家(普通外科医生)组成专家组达成共识。进行了两轮在线共识。在第三轮中举行了顾问委员会会议,讨论了调查结果,并根据临床证据决定了最终陈述。

结果

专家推荐腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)加/经腹腔后肌(retromuscular)/经腹完全腹膜外/迷你或更小的开放式下置修补术/经腹腹膜前/经腹腔部分腹膜外/皮下补片修补术/腹腔镜内直肌前鞘修补术作为腹侧疝(VH)的有效微创外科(MAS)选择。对于原发性脐疝<4cm 且无分离、垂直单一线切口存在的切口疝、有症状的疝、BMI>40kg/m2 且缺损<4cm 的患者,以及用于 MAS VH 手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 3/4 的患者,腹腔内修复技术是首选的 MAS 手术。对于宽度<4cm 的中线切口疝和先前接受过剖腹手术的患者,IPOM 加是首选的 MAS 手术。对于 L3 疝<4cm、有分离的中线疝<4cm 和 M5 疝,腹膜外修复技术是首选的 MAS 手术。

结论

共识陈述将有助于规范 LVHR 实践,改善决策,并为印度的 VH 中的 MAS 提供指导。