Shimura Tetsuro, Yamamoto Masanori, Kano Seiji, Kagase Ai, Kodama Atsuko, Koyama Yutaka, Otsuka Toshiaki, Kohsaka Shun, Tada Norio, Yamanaka Futoshi, Naganuma Toru, Araki Motoharu, Shirai Shinichi, Mizutani Kazuki, Tabata Minoru, Ueno Hiroshi, Takagi Kensuke, Higashimori Akihiro, Watanabe Yusuke, Hayashida Kentaro
Department of Cardiology, Toyohashi Heart Center, Toyohashi, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Nagoya Heart Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep;6(5):532-537. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.09.06.
There are no standardized criteria for measuring patients' frailty. We examined prognosis based on four frailty markers [serum albumin level, grip strength, gait speed, and clinical frailty scale (CFS)] in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between October 2013 and April 2016 and were recorded in the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN) Japanese multicenter registry. Serum albumin level was assessed by dividing patients into two groups: hypoalbuminemia or non-hypoalbuminemia according to their serum albumin level. Clinical outcomes including all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality rates after TAVR were compared. During the follow-up period cumulative all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality rates were significantly higher in the hypoalbuminemia group than in the non-hypoalbuminemia group. This result remained unchanged even after a propensity-matched model was used in terms of cumulative all-cause and non-cardiovascular mortality; however, differences in cardiovascular mortality rates were attenuated. To consider the impact of grip strength patients were divided into a low or high peak grip strength group based on classification and regression tree (CART) survival analysis. The clinical outcomes for each sex were compared between the two groups. In both sexes the cumulative 1-year mortality rates were significantly different between the two groups. To investigate gait speed patients were classified into two gait speed groups (low or high gait speed group) based on CART survival analysis. Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The cumulative 1-year mortality rate was significantly different between the two gait speed groups. The effect of CFS on prognosis after TAVR was assessed. Patients were categorized into five groups based on the following CFS scores: CFS1-3, CFS4, CFS5, CFS6, and CFS ≥7. We evaluated the relationship between the CFS score and other indicators of frailty markers. We also assessed the mid-term mortality among the five groups. The CFS score had a significant correlation with other frailty markers. The cumulative 1-year mortality increased with an increasing CFS score. In the Cox regression multivariable analysis, the CFS score was an independent predictive factor of an increased late cumulative mortality risk. In conclusion, the results suggest that serum albumin level, grip strength, gait speed, and CFS score are all useful indicators when considering the optimal indications and risk stratification for TAVR.
目前尚无用于衡量患者虚弱程度的标准化标准。我们在2013年10月至2016年4月期间接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)并记录在优化导管瓣膜干预(OCEAN)日本多中心注册研究中的患者中,基于四种虚弱标志物[血清白蛋白水平、握力、步速和临床虚弱量表(CFS)]对预后进行了研究。血清白蛋白水平通过根据患者血清白蛋白水平将其分为两组来评估:低白蛋白血症组或非低白蛋白血症组。比较了TAVR术后包括全因、心血管和非心血管死亡率在内的临床结局。在随访期间,低白蛋白血症组的累积全因、心血管和非心血管死亡率显著高于非低白蛋白血症组。即使在使用倾向匹配模型分析累积全因和非心血管死亡率后,这一结果仍未改变;然而,心血管死亡率的差异有所减弱。为了考量握力的影响,基于分类回归树(CART)生存分析将患者分为低峰值握力组或高峰值握力组。比较了两组中各性别的临床结局。在两性中,两组的累积1年死亡率均存在显著差异。为了研究步速,基于CART生存分析将患者分为两个步速组(低步速组或高步速组)。比较了两组的临床结局。两个步速组的累积1年死亡率存在显著差异。评估了CFS对TAVR术后预后的影响。根据以下CFS评分将患者分为五组:CFS1 - 3、CFS4、CFS5、CFS6和CFS≥7。我们评估了CFS评分与其他虚弱标志物指标之间的关系。我们还评估了五组患者的中期死亡率。CFS评分与其他虚弱标志物存在显著相关性。累积1年死亡率随CFS评分升高而增加。在Cox回归多变量分析中,CFS评分是晚期累积死亡风险增加的独立预测因素。总之,结果表明,在考虑TAVR的最佳适应证和风险分层时,血清白蛋白水平、握力、步速和CFS评分均为有用的指标。