• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Postoperative visual performance with a bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lens during a 1-year follow-up.双焦点和三焦点衍射人工晶状体术后1年随访期间的视觉表现
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):1528-1533. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.08. eCollection 2017.
2
Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract surgery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL.白内障手术后植入双焦点或三焦点衍射型人工晶状体视觉性能的比较分析。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Oct;30(10):666-72. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140903-06.
3
Visual Performance With Bifocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Three-Armed Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial.双焦点和三焦点衍射型人工晶状体的视觉性能:一项前瞻性三臂随机多中心临床试验。
J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):655-662. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170504-04.
4
Comparison of the Visual Performance After Implantation of Bifocal and Trifocal Intraocular Lenses Having an Identical Platform.相同平台的双焦点和三焦点人工晶状体植入术后视觉性能比较
J Refract Surg. 2018 Apr 1;34(4):273-280. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180214-01.
5
Comparison of a trifocal intraocular lens with a +3.0 D bifocal IOL: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial.三焦点人工晶状体与 +3.0 D 双焦点人工晶状体的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验的结果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Aug;41(8):1631-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.011.
6
Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens.衍射三焦点环曲面人工晶状体与衍射变迹双焦点环曲面人工晶状体植入术后视觉效果的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar 17;10:455-61. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S103375. eCollection 2016.
7
Comparison of Reading Speed after Bilateral Bifocal and Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation.双侧双焦点和三焦点人工晶状体植入术后阅读速度的比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;32(2):77-82. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.0057. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
8
Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes of diffractive bifocal toric and trifocal toric intraocular lenses 12 months after implantation in patients with moderate to high myopia.比较中高度近视患者植入衍射性双焦点散光型和三焦点散光型人工晶状体 12 个月后的视力和屈光结果。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;41(9):3029-3040. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01865-3. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
9
Comparison of visual outcomes of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and a refractive bifocal intraocular lens in eyes with axial myopia: a prospective cohort study.轴性近视患者的衍射三焦点人工晶状体与折射双焦点人工晶状体视觉效果的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02626-1.
10
Comparison between bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of two bifocal intraocular lenses.三焦点人工晶状体双侧植入与双焦点人工晶状体混合植入的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 1;11:1393-1397. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S139909. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of mild posterior capsule opacification on visual outcomes in trifocal diffractive pseudophakic eyes: A multicenter prospective study.轻度后囊膜混浊对三焦点衍射人工晶状体眼视觉效果的影响:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2025 Feb 14;5(2):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2025.02.002. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes of an Optimized Trifocal Intraocular Lens.优化型三焦点人工晶状体的临床及患者报告结局
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 15;13(14):4133. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144133.
3
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.多焦点人工晶状体与白内障摘除术后老视患者的双焦点人工晶状体比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 27;1(1):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub3.
4
Contrast Sensitivity and Patient Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Bi-Aspheric Hydrophobic Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens.双侧植入双非球面疏水三焦点衍射人工晶状体后的对比敏感度和患者报告的结果
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 19;17:247-258. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S400136. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens.三焦点人工晶状体与旋转不对称折射型多焦点人工晶状体单眼植入术后视觉质量的对比分析
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 18;15(9):1460-1467. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.09.08. eCollection 2022.
6
First Results after Implantation of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: Visual and Optical Performance.亲水性和疏水性三焦点人工晶状体植入后的初步结果:视觉和光学性能
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 18;2021:3514577. doi: 10.1155/2021/3514577. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparative Efficacy Between Trifocal and Bifocal Intraocular Lens Among Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.白内障手术患者中三焦点与双焦点人工晶状体的比较疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 30;8:647268. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.647268. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparing the visual outcome, visual quality, and satisfaction among three types of multi-focal intraocular lenses.比较三种多焦点人工晶状体的视觉效果、视觉质量和满意度。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 9;10(1):14832. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69318-y.
9
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.老花眼患者白内障摘除术后三焦点人工晶状体与双焦点人工晶状体的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 18;6(6):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub2.
10
A novel standardized test system to evaluate dynamic visual acuity post trifocal or monofocal intraocular lens implantation: a multicenter study.一种新型标准化测试系统评估三焦点或单焦点人工晶状体植入术后动态视力:一项多中心研究。
Eye (Lond). 2020 Dec;34(12):2235-2241. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0780-9. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens.衍射三焦点环曲面人工晶状体与衍射变迹双焦点环曲面人工晶状体植入术后视觉效果的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar 17;10:455-61. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S103375. eCollection 2016.
2
Prospective Clinical Comparison of Patient Outcomes Following Implantation of Trifocal or Bifocal Intraocular Lenses.三焦点或双焦点人工晶状体植入术后患者预后的前瞻性临床比较
J Refract Surg. 2016 Mar;32(3):146-51. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160114-01.
3
COMPARATION OF REFRACTIVE RESULTS WITH BIFOCAL IMPLANTS AT LISA 809 AND TRIFOCAL AT LISA TRI839.LISA 809双焦点人工晶状体与LISA TRI839三焦点人工晶状体屈光结果的比较。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr-Jun;59(2):100-2.
4
Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation to Treat Visual Demands in Various Distances Following Lens Removal.三焦点人工晶状体植入术治疗晶状体摘除术后不同距离的视觉需求
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;161:71-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.030. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
5
Implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens: one-year follow-up.衍射型三焦点人工晶状体植入术:一年随访
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Aug;41(8):1623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.11.050.
6
Clinical Outcomes after Binocular Implantation of a New Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens.新型三焦点衍射人工晶状体双眼植入后的临床结果
J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:962891. doi: 10.1155/2015/962891. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
7
Binocular function to increase visual outcome in patients implanted with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.双眼视功能可提高植入衍射三焦点人工晶状体患者的视觉效果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug 21;15:110. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0089-9.
8
Quantitative evaluation of visual function 12 months after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal IOL.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):516-24. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000638. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
9
Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation.双侧三焦点衍射型人工晶状体植入后的视觉效果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar 14;15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0012-4.
10
Light-distortion analysis as a possible indicator of visual quality after refractive lens exchange with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.屈光性晶状体置换联合衍射多焦点人工晶状体植入术后,光畸变分析作为视觉质量潜在指标的研究
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):613-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.07.033. Epub 2015 Feb 21.

双焦点和三焦点衍射人工晶状体术后1年随访期间的视觉表现

Postoperative visual performance with a bifocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lens during a 1-year follow-up.

作者信息

Mojzis Peter, Kukuckova Lucia, Majerova Katarina, Ziak Peter, Piñero David P

机构信息

Premium Clinic, Teplice 41501, Czech Republic.

Eye Department of Regional Hospital in Havlickuv Brod, Havlickuv Brod 58001, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 18;10(10):1528-1533. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.10.08. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.18240/ijo.2017.10.08
PMID:29062771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5638973/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes with a diffractive bifocal and trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) during a 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

Prospective comparative study including 75 eyes of 38 patients (44-70y) undergoing uneventful cataract surgery. Each patient was randomly assigned to one type of IOL, bifocal (35 eyes) or trifocal (40 eyes). Visual, refractive, and contrast sensitivity changes were evaluated in a 12-month follow-up. The binocular defocus curve was also measured at 12mo postoperatively.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences between groups were found in postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities (≥0.276). Postoperative corrected near visual acuity (33 cm) was significantly better in the trifocal group during all follow-up (≤0.004) as well as 6-month uncorrected near (=0.008) and distance-corrected near visual acuities (=0.016) (33/40 cm). Significantly better uncorrected intermediate and distance corrected-intermediate visual acuity were found during all follow-up in the trifocal group (<0.001), which was consistent with differences among groups in binocular defocus curve. Differences among groups in contrast sensitivity were minimal, being only significant at 6 months for some low to medium spatial frequencies (≤0.006).

CONCLUSION

Bifocal and trifocal diffractive IOLs are able to provide an effective visual restoration which is maintained during a 12-month follow-up, with a clear benefit of the trifocal IOL for the intermediate vision.

摘要

目的

在12个月的随访期内评估和比较衍射双焦点和三焦点人工晶状体(IOL)的临床效果。

方法

前瞻性对照研究,纳入38例(44 - 70岁)接受白内障手术且过程顺利的患者的75只眼。每位患者随机分配至一种IOL,双焦点(35只眼)或三焦点(40只眼)。在12个月的随访期内评估视力、屈光和对比敏感度的变化。术后12个月时还测量了双眼散焦曲线。

结果

术后未矫正和矫正远视力(≥0.276)在两组间未发现统计学显著差异。在整个随访期内,三焦点组的术后矫正近视力(33 cm)显著更好(≤0.004),以及6个月时的未矫正近视力(=0.008)和距离矫正近视力(=0.016)(33/40 cm)。在整个随访期内,三焦点组的未矫正中视力和距离矫正中视力显著更好(<0.001),这与两组间双眼散焦曲线的差异一致。两组间对比敏感度的差异最小,仅在6个月时某些低至中频空间频率上有显著差异(≤0.006)。

结论

双焦点和三焦点衍射IOL能够提供有效的视力恢复,且在12个月的随访期内保持稳定,三焦点IOL对中视力有明显优势。