Radiologist involvement is associated with reduced use of MRI in the acute period of low back pain in a non-elderly population.

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that "acute-period" lumbar MRI in non-elderly patients with low back pain is less frequently performed at clinics/hospitals with greater involvement of full-time radiologists in the imaging workflow.

METHODS

In a national-level claims database, we identified 14,819 non-elderly patients (mean age: 38.7±8.0 years) who visited clinics/hospitals for low back pain in 2013-2015. We classified the clinics/hospitals into four groups based on the level of full-time radiologist involvement and MRI ownership, and compared the frequency of acute-period lumbar MRI using hierarchical logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients visiting facilities without a full-time radiologist (n=2105) were significantly (p<0.001) more likely to undergo acute-period MRI than those visiting facilities with ≥1 radiologist partially managing imaging workflow (level-1, n=491) or ≥1 radiologist intensively involved in imaging workflow (level-2, n=1190) (15.7% vs. 6.9% and 7.3%; adjusted odds ratio of no-radiologist versus level-2: 2.93, p=0.018). No difference was observed between level-1 and level-2 involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Facilities with no full-time radiologist were more likely to perform acute-period MRI to assess for low back pain, while no difference was seen between facilities with varying levels of radiologist involvement in the imaging workflow. Radiologist involvement may contribute to optimal utilisation of medical imaging.

KEY POINTS

• Lumbar MRI was more frequently performed at facilities without full-time radiologists. • Full-time radiologists may play an important role in appropriate utilisation of imaging. • Frequency of MRI was similar between moderate and intensive radiologist involvement.