• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约州胆绞痛患者的情况如何?急诊科就诊 10 年随访。

What happens to biliary colic patients in New York State? 10-year follow-up from emergency department visits.

机构信息

Division of Bariatric, Foregut and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery. Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Division of Bariatric, Foregut and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, 100 Nichols Road, HSC T19, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):2058-2066. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5902-5. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-017-5902-5
PMID:29063306
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Biliary colic is a common diagnosis for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to examine the outcomes of patients coming to the ED with biliary colic.

METHODS

The NYS longitudinal SPARCS database was used to identify patients presenting to the ED with biliary colic from 2005 to 2014. Through the use of a unique identifier, patients were followed in NYS across multiple institutions. Patients who were lost to follow-up, with duplicated records, and those that underwent percutaneous cholecystectomy tubes were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2014, there were 72,376 patients who presented to an ED with biliary colic. The admission rate was 20.7-26.02%. Overall, most patients who presented to the ED did not undergo surgery (39,567, 54.7%), of which 35,204 (89%) had only one ED visit, while 4,363(11%) returned to the ED (≥ 2 visits). Only 3.23-5.51% of patients underwent cholecystectomy at the time of initial presentation. Most subsequent cholecystectomies were performed electively (27.38-52.51%) (See Table 1 in this article). Average time to surgery among patients with elective cholecystectomy was 178.4 days. From the patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 10.35% had cholecystectomy at their first ED visit, 77.7% had cholecystectomy following the first ED visit, and 12% had multiple ED visits prior to surgery. Among patients who were discharged from the ED, 32% had their surgery at a different hospital than index presentation.

CONCLUSION

A significant portion of patients (48.6%) who present to the ED with biliary colic will not return or have surgery within 5 years. A third of patients who eventually undergo cholecystectomy will go to another hospital for their surgery.

摘要

简介

胆绞痛是患者到急诊科就诊的常见诊断。本研究旨在探讨因胆绞痛到急诊科就诊的患者的结局。

方法

利用纽约纵向 SPARCS 数据库,自 2005 年至 2014 年,确定因胆绞痛到急诊科就诊的患者。通过使用唯一标识符,患者在纽约州的多个机构中进行了随访。未随访、重复记录和接受经皮胆囊造瘘管引流术的患者被排除在分析之外。

结果

2005 年至 2014 年间,有 72376 例患者因胆绞痛到急诊科就诊。入院率为 20.7%-26.02%。总体而言,大多数到急诊科就诊的患者未行手术(39567 例,54.7%),其中 35204 例(89%)仅就诊 1 次,4363 例(11%)再次就诊(≥2 次)。初次就诊时行胆囊切除术的患者仅占 3.23%-5.51%。大多数后续胆囊切除术为择期手术(27.38%-52.51%)(见本文表 1)。择期胆囊切除术患者的平均手术时间为 178.4 天。在接受胆囊切除术的患者中,10.35%在首次急诊科就诊时行胆囊切除术,77.7%在首次急诊科就诊后行胆囊切除术,12%在手术前多次急诊科就诊。在从急诊科出院的患者中,32%的患者在索引就诊之外的医院进行手术。

结论

有相当一部分(48.6%)因胆绞痛到急诊科就诊的患者在 5 年内不会再次就诊或接受手术。最终行胆囊切除术的患者中有三分之一会到其他医院进行手术。

相似文献

1
What happens to biliary colic patients in New York State? 10-year follow-up from emergency department visits.纽约州胆绞痛患者的情况如何?急诊科就诊 10 年随访。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):2058-2066. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5902-5. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
2
Success of elective cholecystectomy treatment plans after emergency department visit.择期胆囊切除术治疗方案在急诊科就诊后的效果。
J Surg Res. 2015 Jan;193(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
3
Hospital readmission after emergency room visit for cholelithiasis.因胆结石到急诊室就诊后的医院再入院情况。
J Surg Res. 2015 Aug;197(2):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
Biliary colic in the emergency department: A state-wide analysis of one-year costs and clinical outcomes.急诊科的胆绞痛:全州范围内一年成本及临床结局分析
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Feb 10;12:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.02.002. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Peri-operative emergency department utilization in inpatient and outpatient Medicare laparoscopic cholecystectomy.住院和门诊 Medicare 腹腔镜胆囊切除术的围手术期急诊部门利用情况。
Am J Surg. 2018 Mar;215(3):367-370. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.036. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
6
Emergency presentations of acute biliary pain: changing patterns of management in a tertiary institute.急性胆绞痛的急诊表现:一所三级医疗机构中不断变化的管理模式
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Dec;88(12):1337-1342. doi: 10.1111/ans.14898. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
7
Early cholecystectomy (< 72 h) is associated with lower rate of complications and bile duct injury: a study of 109,862 cholecystectomies in the state of New York.早期胆囊切除术(<72 小时)与较低的并发症和胆管损伤发生率相关:纽约州 109862 例胆囊切除术研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3051-3056. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07049-6. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
8
Association of Patient and Visit Characteristics With Rate and Timing of Urologic Procedures for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department With Renal Colic.患者和就诊特征与因肾绞痛从急诊科出院的患者接受泌尿科治疗的比例和时间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1916454. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16454.
9
Does the adoption of an emergency general surgery service model influence volume of cholecystectomies at a tertiary care center.采用紧急普通外科服务模式是否会影响三级保健中心的胆囊切除术量。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3064-3071. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07052-x. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
10
Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best management for biliary colic. A prospective randomized study of 75 cases.急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术是治疗胆绞痛的最佳方法。一项对75例患者的前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Surg. 2005;22(1-2):95-9. doi: 10.1159/000085300. Epub 2005 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of symptomatic cholelithiasis: a systematic review.症状性胆石症的治疗:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 12;11(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02135-8.
2
Administrative codes may have limited utility in diagnosing biliary colic in emergency department visits: A validation study.行政编码在急诊科就诊时诊断胆绞痛方面的效用可能有限:一项验证性研究。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022 Aug 31;26(3):277-280. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.21-171. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
3
Patterns of care after cholecystostomy tube placement.胆囊造瘘管放置后的护理模式。

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology and outcomes of acute abdominal pain in a large urban Emergency Department: retrospective analysis of 5,340 cases.大型城市急诊科急性腹痛的流行病学及结局:5340例病例的回顾性分析
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Oct;4(19):362. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.09.10.
2
Cost-effectiveness of a new strategy to identify uncomplicated gallstone disease patients that will benefit from a cholecystectomy.一种用于识别将从胆囊切除术中获益的非复杂性胆结石疾病患者的新策略的成本效益。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2534-2540. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5256-4. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
3
Nineteen-year trends in incidence and indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the NY State experience.
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):2778-2785. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08562-3. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
A Rare Case of Choledochal Cyst Presented as Sudden and Severe Abdominal Pain.一例以突发剧烈腹痛为表现的胆总管囊肿罕见病例。
J Med Ultrasound. 2020 Sep 12;28(4):256-259. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_27_20. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术的发病率及适应证的19年趋势:纽约州的经验
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1651-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5154-9. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
4
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared with observation/conservative management for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.与观察/保守治疗相比,胆囊切除术对预防无并发症的有症状胆结石或胆囊炎成人患者复发症状和并发症的临床有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价和经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Aug;18(55):1-101, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta18550.
5
PREOP-Gallstones: A Prognostic Nomogram for the Management of Symptomatic Cholelithiasis in Older Patients.术前胆结石:老年患者有症状胆石症管理的预后列线图
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1184-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000868.
6
Understanding the statistics and limitations of large database analyses.理解大型数据库分析的统计学原理及局限性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jul 15;39(16):1311-2. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000352.
7
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗单纯性胆绞痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30;2013(6):CD007196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007196.pub3.
8
Hospital volume and patient outcomes after cholecystectomy in Scotland: retrospective, national population based study.苏格兰胆囊切除术患者术后结局与医院容量的关系:回顾性全国人群研究
BMJ. 2012 May 23;344:e3330. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3330.
9
Abdominal pain in the ED: a 35 year retrospective.急诊科腹痛:35 年回顾性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;29(7):711-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.045. Epub 2010 May 1.
10
SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.腹腔镜胆道手术临床应用的SAGES指南。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2368-86. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1268-7. Epub 2010 Aug 13.