Mongan A M, Kerins F, McKenna B, Quinn S M, Mullaney P
Department of Ophthalmology, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland.
Information Communication Technology Department, Level 4, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland.
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 May;187(2):529-535. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1694-9. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
This study evaluates a community optometrist-delivered postoperative care scheme in patients discharged from the hospital ophthalmology department following uncomplicated cataract surgery.
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of electronic patient records (EPR) in facilitating co-managed cataract care.
We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained Medisoft EPR database of postoperative cataract review data at a single centre, Sligo University Hospital (SUH), which serves a large and predominantly rural catchment area. All patients undergoing cataract surgery at SUH from October 2012 to September 2013 were included in this study. A total of 39 optometric practices, all with access to the Medisoft EPR software, participated in this pilot co-management scheme.
One thousand four hundred and twenty-two cataract surgeries were performed in SUH (55% female, 45% male); 1011 patients (71%) were discharged to the community on the day of cataract surgery. Complete postoperative feedback (i.e. data on refraction, visual acuity and intraocular pressure) was available in 97% of these patients compared to 50% of patients reviewed in the hospital. Patients followed up by optometrists were twice as likely to have complete postoperative clinical details (RR = 1.934, 95% CI: 1.759-2.126, p < 0.0001). Overall, 65% of operations were performed on first eyes. Hospital doctors were more likely to document requirement for second eye surgery compared to community optometrists (RR = 1.434, 95% CI: 1.302-1.580, p < 0.0001).
Optometrists provided an excellent postoperative care service with superior postoperative feedback rates compared to hospital doctors. EPRs facilitate a postoperative shared-care pathway that is of high quality and efficiency with major economic advantages.
本研究评估了社区验光师为眼科出院后接受单纯性白内障手术的患者提供术后护理方案的情况。
本研究旨在评估电子病历(EPR)在促进白内障联合管理护理中的有效性。
我们对斯莱戈大学医院(SUH)前瞻性维护的Medisoft EPR数据库中术后白内障复查数据进行了回顾性分析,该医院服务于一个主要为农村的广大集水区。2012年10月至2013年9月在SUH接受白内障手术的所有患者均纳入本研究。共有39家验光诊所参与了该试点联合管理方案,所有诊所都可使用Medisoft EPR软件。
SUH共进行了1422例白内障手术(女性占55%,男性占45%);1011例患者(71%)在白内障手术当天出院至社区。这些患者中有97%获得了完整的术后反馈(即关于验光、视力和眼压的数据),而在医院接受复查的患者中这一比例为50%。由验光师随访的患者获得完整术后临床细节的可能性是其他患者的两倍(相对风险=1.934,95%置信区间:1.759 - 2.126,p<0.0001)。总体而言,65%的手术是在第一眼进行的。与社区验光师相比,医院医生更有可能记录第二眼手术的需求(相对风险=1.434,95%置信区间:1.302 - 1.580,p<0.0001)。
与医院医生相比,验光师提供了出色的术后护理服务,术后反馈率更高。电子病历促进了高质量、高效率且具有重大经济优势的术后共享护理途径。