Man Janice Y, Gurnaney Harshad G, Dubow Scott R, DiMaggio Theresa J, Kroeplin Gina R, Adzick N Scott, Muhly Wallis T
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Dec;27(12):1227-1234. doi: 10.1111/pan.13264. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
Pain management following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum is variable. We recently adopted a comprehensive multimodal analgesic protocol that standardizes perioperative analgesic management. We hypothesized that patients managed with this protocol would use more opioids postoperatively, have similar pain control, and shorter length of stay compared to patients managed with thoracic epidural infusion.
We retrospectively compared opioid consumption, pain scores, and length of stay between a cohort of patients managed with our multimodal analgesic protocol and a cohort managed with a thoracic epidural infusion.
This retrospective cohort comparison includes patients, 8 to 21 years of age, managed with either thoracic epidural infusion (n = 21) or multimodal analgesic protocol (n = 29) following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum from January 1, 2011 through September 15, 2015. The primary outcome, total daily opioid consumption in morphine equivalents, is presented as an average by postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included median daily pain score and length of stay.
Patients were similar in age, weight, sex, and physical status. Patients managed with thoracic epidural infusion received less opioid (morphine equivalents-mg/kg) intraoperatively compared to multimodal analgesic protocol (difference of mean [95% confidence interval] 0.22 [0.16-0.28] P ≤ .01) but required more total opioid through postoperative day 3 (difference of mean [95% confidence interval] 1.2 [0.26-2.14] P = .01). We did not observe a difference in pain scores. Median length of stay was 1 day less in patients managed with multimodal analgesic protocol (difference of median [95% confidence interval] 1 [0.3-1.7] P = .003).
Implementation of a standardized comprehensive multimodal analgesic protocol following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum resulted in equivalent analgesia with a modest reduction in length of stay when compared to thoracic epidural. We did not observe an opioid sparing effect in our thoracic epidural which may reflect technique variability.
漏斗胸微创修复术后的疼痛管理方式各异。我们最近采用了一种全面的多模式镇痛方案,使围手术期镇痛管理标准化。我们假设,与采用胸段硬膜外输注进行管理的患者相比,采用该方案管理的患者术后会使用更多阿片类药物,疼痛控制情况相似,住院时间更短。
我们回顾性比较了一组采用多模式镇痛方案管理的患者与一组采用胸段硬膜外输注管理的患者之间的阿片类药物消耗量、疼痛评分和住院时间。
这项回顾性队列比较研究纳入了2011年1月1日至2015年9月15日期间接受漏斗胸微创修复术后采用胸段硬膜外输注(n = 21)或多模式镇痛方案(n = 29)管理的8至21岁患者。主要结局指标为以吗啡当量表示的每日阿片类药物总消耗量,按术后天数给出平均值。次要结局指标包括每日疼痛评分中位数和住院时间。
患者在年龄、体重、性别和身体状况方面相似。与多模式镇痛方案相比,采用胸段硬膜外输注管理的患者术中接受的阿片类药物(吗啡当量 - mg/kg)更少(平均差异[95%置信区间]为0.22 [0.16 - 0.28],P≤.01),但术后第3天所需的阿片类药物总量更多(平均差异[95%置信区间]为1.2 [0.26 - 2.14],P =.01)。我们未观察到疼痛评分存在差异。采用多模式镇痛方案管理的患者中位住院时间短1天(中位数差异[95%置信区间]为1 [0.3 - 1.7],P =.003)。
漏斗胸微创修复术后实施标准化的全面多模式镇痛方案,与胸段硬膜外镇痛相比,镇痛效果相当,住院时间略有缩短。我们未观察到胸段硬膜外镇痛有阿片类药物节省效应,这可能反映了技术的变异性。