• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷你胃旁路术后的血液学指标和造血素水平:与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的配对比较。

Haematological indices and haematinic levels after mini gastric bypass: a matched comparison with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

作者信息

Madhok B M, Mahawar K K, Hadfield J N, Courtney M, Stubbing-Moore A, Koshy S, Small P K

机构信息

Bariatric Unit, Department of General Surgery, Sunderland Royal Hospital, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.

出版信息

Clin Obes. 2018 Feb;8(1):43-49. doi: 10.1111/cob.12227. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1111/cob.12227
PMID:29063708
Abstract

Many surgeons believe mini gastric bypass (MGB) is more likely to cause micronutrient malabsorption compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Till date, there is no published study evaluating haematological indices and haematinic levels in patients undergoing MGB and comparing these with a matched cohort of RYGB. Two hundred patients who underwent MGB between October 2012 and October 2015 were matched to 200 patients who underwent RYGB for age, sex, body mass index and time of surgery. We then compared haemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, iron, ferritin, vitamin B12 and folic acid levels preoperatively and at 6 monthly intervals after surgery until 2 years. The percentage total weight loss was significantly higher in the MGB group compared to the RYGB group at all time points. At 2 years, MGB and RYGB both led to an increase in anaemia rates but the difference was only significant for MGB group. Compared to RYGB, MGB patients were more likely to be anaemic at 2 years, although the difference was not significant statistically (16.6% vs. 12.7%; P value = 0.55). There was a trend for lower iron and folate levels in MGB group compared to RYGB group but the difference was statistically significant at some of the time periods only (significantly lower folate at 6 and 12 months and lower iron at 6 months in the MGB group). MGB leads to a significant increase in anaemia rates in a supplemented cohort. There is a trend towards lower iron and folate levels and higher anaemia rates in MGB group in comparison with RYGB. Larger studies with longer follow-up should evaluate results of MGB with a shorter biliopancreatic limb.

摘要

许多外科医生认为,与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)相比,迷你胃旁路术(MGB)更易导致微量营养素吸收不良。迄今为止,尚无已发表的研究评估接受 MGB 的患者的血液学指标和造血素水平,并将其与匹配的 RYGB 队列进行比较。将 2012 年 10 月至 2015 年 10 月期间接受 MGB 的 200 名患者,按照年龄、性别、体重指数和手术时间与 200 名接受 RYGB 的患者进行匹配。然后我们比较了术前以及术后每 6 个月直至 2 年时的血红蛋白、平均红细胞体积、铁、铁蛋白、维生素 B12 和叶酸水平。在所有时间点,MGB 组的总体重减轻百分比均显著高于 RYGB 组。在 2 年时,MGB 和 RYGB 均导致贫血率增加,但差异仅在 MGB 组显著。与 RYGB 相比,MGB 患者在 2 年时更易贫血,尽管差异无统计学意义(16.6% 对 12.7%;P 值 = 0.55)。与 RYGB 组相比,MGB 组的铁和叶酸水平有降低趋势,但仅在某些时间段差异有统计学意义(MGB 组在 6 个月和 12 个月时叶酸显著降低,在 6 个月时铁降低)。在补充队列中,MGB 导致贫血率显著增加。与 RYGB 相比,MGB 组有铁和叶酸水平降低以及贫血率升高的趋势。需要进行更大规模、更长随访时间的研究来评估采用较短胆胰支的 MGB 的结果。

相似文献

1
Haematological indices and haematinic levels after mini gastric bypass: a matched comparison with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.迷你胃旁路术后的血液学指标和造血素水平:与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的配对比较。
Clin Obes. 2018 Feb;8(1):43-49. doi: 10.1111/cob.12227. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
2
Comparison of nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and after biliopancreatic diversion with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后与胆胰转流并Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后营养缺乏情况的比较。
Obes Surg. 2002 Aug;12(4):551-8. doi: 10.1381/096089202762252334.
3
Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.超级肥胖患者的管理:单吻合口(迷你)胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3504-3509. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5376-x. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
4
Anemia following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity; a 5-year follow-up study.病态肥胖患者接受Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术后的贫血:一项5年随访研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug;53(8):917-922. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1489892.
5
Are vitamin B12 and folate deficiency clinically important after roux-en-Y gastric bypass?胃旁路手术后维生素B12和叶酸缺乏在临床上重要吗?
J Gastrointest Surg. 1998 Sep-Oct;2(5):436-42. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80034-6.
6
A 7-Year Clinical Audit of 1107 Cases Comparing Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass, and Mini-Gastric Bypass, to Determine an Effective and Safe Bariatric and Metabolic Procedure.对1107例患者进行7年临床审计,比较袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和迷你胃旁路术,以确定一种有效且安全的减肥和代谢手术方法。
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):926-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1869-2.
7
A Time Interval of More Than 18 Months Between a Pregnancy and a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Increases the Risk of Iron Deficiency and Anaemia in Pregnancy.怀孕与Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术之间间隔超过18个月会增加孕期缺铁和贫血的风险。
Obes Surg. 2016 Oct;26(10):2457-62. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2130-3.
8
Malabsorption and intestinal adaptation after one anastomosis gastric bypass compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in rats.大鼠单吻合口胃旁路术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后的吸收不良及肠道适应性比较
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016 Sep 1;311(3):G492-500. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00197.2016. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
9
Anaemia and related nutrient deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术后的贫血及相关营养素缺乏:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 16;5(7):e006964. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006964.
10
MGB-OAGB: Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Nutritional Deficiency, Weight Loss, and Comorbidity Resolution.MGB-OAGB:胆胰旁路术胆胰支长度对营养缺乏、体重减轻和合并症缓解的影响。
Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3439-3445. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3405-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Anemia rates after one-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.单吻合口胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术术后贫血发生率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surg Today. 2025 May;55(5):652-658. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02946-3. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Outcomes following reoperative bariatric surgery following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at a tertiary care centre.三级护理中心腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后再次进行减重手术的结果。
J Minim Access Surg. 2024 Jul 1;20(3):247-252. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_125_23. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Changes in Nutritional Outcomes After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后营养结局的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Jun;34(6):2116-2129. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07232-2. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
4
Summarizing Consensus Guidelines on Obesity Management: A Joint, Multidisciplinary Venture of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity & Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) and World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO).肥胖管理共识指南总结:国际肥胖与代谢疾病外科联盟(IFSO)和世界胃肠病学组织(WGO)的联合多学科项目。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023;57(10):967-976. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001916. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
5
Nutritional Complications After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和单吻合口胃旁路术后的营养并发症:一项比较性系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2022 Jan 11;14(1):e21114. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21114. eCollection 2022 Jan.
6
What Is Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery Expressed in Percentage Total Weight Loss (%TWL)? A Systematic Review.减重手术后的体重减轻百分比(%TWL)是什么?系统评价。
Obes Surg. 2021 Aug;31(8):3833-3847. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05394-x. Epub 2021 May 17.
7
IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB).国际肥胖与代谢外科学会关于单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)的更新立场声明。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):3251-3278. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05413-x. Epub 2021 May 3.
8
Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review.关于单吻合口/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB/MGB)的非共识领域:叙述性综述。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jun;31(6):2453-2463. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
9
Iron, Vitamin B, Folate and Copper Deficiency After Bariatric Surgery and the Impact on Anaemia: a Systematic Review.减重手术后铁、维生素 B、叶酸和铜缺乏及对贫血的影响:系统评价。
Obes Surg. 2020 Nov;30(11):4542-4591. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04872-y. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
Outcomes in Super Obese Patients Undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.超级肥胖患者行单吻合口胃旁路术或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的结局。
Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1242-1247. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03673-8.