• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超级肥胖患者行单吻合口胃旁路术或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的结局。

Outcomes in Super Obese Patients Undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, 110029, India.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1242-1247. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03673-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-018-03673-8
PMID:30656569
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The data on the role of OAGB in super obese patients and its direct comparison with LSG in super obese patients is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To compare weight loss, impact on comorbidities and nutritional parameters between LSG and OAGB in super obese patients.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 75 matched patients with BMI > 50, who underwent either laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), was analyzed retrospectively. Percentage excess weight loss at 1 year and impact on comorbidities were compared in both the groups.

RESULTS

Both the groups were comparable for age, sex, BMI, and presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. Mean TWL% ± 2SD at 1 year was 30.09% ± 19.76 in patients undergoing LSG, while it was 39.9% ± 12.78 in patients undergoing OAGB (p < 0.001). In the LSG group, 85.7% and 66.67% of patients had remission of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, respectively, as compared to 77.77% and 78.5%, respectively, in the OAGB group. All the patients with OSA had a resolution of their symptoms in both the groups. Patients in the OAGB group became more folate deficient despite regular supplementation.

CONCLUSION

Weight loss following OAGB was found to be better than LSG in the super obese patients in our study. There was a similar resolution of comorbidities and a lesser rate of major complications in the OAGB group.

摘要

简介

关于 OAGB 在超级肥胖患者中的作用及其与 LSG 在超级肥胖患者中的直接比较的数据很少。

目的

比较超级肥胖患者中 LSG 和 OAGB 的体重减轻、对合并症的影响和营养参数。

方法

回顾性分析了 75 例 BMI>50 的匹配患者的前瞻性收集数据,这些患者接受了腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)或单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)。比较两组患者术后 1 年的超重体重减轻百分比和对合并症的影响。

结果

两组患者的年龄、性别、BMI 和是否合并糖尿病无差异。LSG 组患者术后 1 年的平均 TWL%±2SD 为 30.09%±19.76%,而 OAGB 组为 39.9%±12.78%(p<0.001)。LSG 组中,85.7%和 66.67%的糖尿病患者和高血压患者分别得到缓解,而 OAGB 组中分别为 77.77%和 78.5%。两组所有 OSA 患者的症状均得到缓解。尽管补充了叶酸,但 OAGB 组的患者叶酸缺乏症更为严重。

结论

在我们的研究中,OAGB 术后体重减轻优于 LSG。OAGB 组的合并症缓解率相似,但严重并发症发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Outcomes in Super Obese Patients Undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.超级肥胖患者行单吻合口胃旁路术或腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的结局。
Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1242-1247. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03673-8.
2
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) vs One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Patients with Super-Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 60 kg/m).腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)与单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)治疗超级肥胖患者(BMI≥60kg/m²)的疗效比较
Obes Surg. 2024 Jan;34(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06960-1. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
3
Clinical outcomes after one anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obese patients.超级肥胖患者行单吻合口胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的临床转归比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4401-4407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08790-7. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
4
Short- to medium-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass compared with one-anastomosis gastric bypass for weight recidivism after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后体重复胖中单吻合口十二指肠空肠旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术的短期至中期结果比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Aug;16(8):1060-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.04.014. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 Year Follow-up Data: a Randomised Control Trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与改良胃旁路术-全腹腔镜下全胃旷置术3年随访数据:一项随机对照试验
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2820-2828. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3255-3.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Morbidly Obese, Super-Obese, and Super-Super Obese Patients for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖、超病态肥胖和超级超病态肥胖患者的疗效比较。
Obes Surg. 2018 Jun;28(6):1484-1491. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3053-3.
7
Long-term outcomes of revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后翻修性单吻合口胃旁路术的长期结局
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 19;408(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02787-7.
8
Comparative analysis of 5-year efficacy and outcomes of single anastomosis procedures as revisional surgery for weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy.单吻合口手术作为胃旁路术后体重反弹的翻修手术的 5 年疗效和结局的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7548-7555. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10234-3. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
9
LSG vs OAGB: 7-Year Follow-up Data of a Randomised Control Trial and Comparative Outcome Based on BAROS Score.LSG 与 OAGB:基于 BAROS 评分的一项随机对照试验和对比结果的 7 年随访数据。
Obes Surg. 2024 Apr;34(4):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07114-7. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
10
Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study.从腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(LAGB)和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)转为一体式胃旁路术(OAGB):一项多中心回顾性研究的初步数据。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Aug;15(8):1332-1339. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Banded One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (BOAGB) for Patients Living with Obesity and Extreme Obesity: A Single Institution's Experience.带环式胃旁路吻合术(BOAGB)治疗肥胖症和极重度肥胖症患者:单中心经验。
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1756-1763. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07194-5. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) vs One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Patients with Super-Super Obesity (BMI ≥ 60 kg/m).腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)与单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)治疗超级肥胖患者(BMI≥60kg/m²)的疗效比较
Obes Surg. 2024 Jan;34(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06960-1. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Haematological indices and haematinic levels after mini gastric bypass: a matched comparison with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.迷你胃旁路术后的血液学指标和造血素水平:与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的配对比较。
Clin Obes. 2018 Feb;8(1):43-49. doi: 10.1111/cob.12227. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
2
Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.超级肥胖患者的管理:单吻合口(迷你)胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3504-3509. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5376-x. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
3
Comparison of mini-gastric bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in a mainly super-obese patient group: first results.
Does one-anastomosis gastric bypass provide better outcomes than sleeve gastrectomy in patients with BMI greater than 50? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
对于 BMI 大于 50 的患者,单吻合胃旁路术是否比袖状胃切除术提供更好的结果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):277-286. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000203.
4
Long-Term Trajectories in Weight and Health Outcomes Following Multidisciplinary Publicly Funded Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Clinically Severe Obesity (≥ 3 Associated Comorbidities): A Nine-Year Prospective Cohort Study in Australia.临床严重肥胖(≥3种相关合并症)患者接受多学科公共资助减肥手术后体重及健康结局的长期轨迹:澳大利亚一项为期九年的前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 31;11(15):4466. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154466.
5
One anastomosis gastric bypass as a one-stage bariatric surgical procedure in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m.对于 BMI≥50kg/m² 的患者,行 1 吻合口胃旁路术作为 1 期减重手术。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14485-3.
6
Outcomes and Effects of 250-cm Biliopancreatic Limb One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Patients with BMI > 50 kg/m with Total Bowel Length > 6 m: a 2-Year Follow-up.250-cm 胆胰分流胃旁路术治疗 BMI>50kg/m²且总肠长度>6m 的患者的结果和影响:2 年随访。
Obes Surg. 2022 Jul;32(7):2309-2320. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06078-w. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
The first survey addressing patients with BMI over 50: a survey of 789 bariatric surgeons.首项针对 BMI 超过 50 的患者的调查:对 789 名减重外科医生的调查。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6170-6180. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08979-w. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
8
Improvement of Lipid Profile after One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy.胃旁路吻合术与袖状胃切除术对脂代谢的影响。
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 12;13(8):2770. doi: 10.3390/nu13082770.
9
Is One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm Effective in the Treatment of People with Severe Obesity with BMI > 50?150cm 胆胰支的单吻合胃旁路术治疗 BMI>50 的重度肥胖患者是否有效?
Obes Surg. 2021 Sep;31(9):3966-3974. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05499-3. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
10
Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis (loop) gastric bypass for obesity: A prospective comparative study of weight loss and complications.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与单吻合口(回肠袢)胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的前瞻性比较研究:体重减轻及并发症情况
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 May 18;55:143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.040. eCollection 2020 Jul.
主要为超级肥胖患者群体中迷你胃旁路手术与袖状胃切除术的比较:初步结果
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1156-1162. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5085-5. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
4
Long-Term Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: 5 to 8-Year Results.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症的长期结果:5至8年的结果
Obes Surg. 2017 Jan;27(1):59-63. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2235-8.
5
Management of Super-super Obese Patients: Comparison Between Mini (One Anastomosis) Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.超级肥胖患者的管理:迷你(单吻合口)胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的比较
Obes Surg. 2016 Jul;26(7):1646-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2181-5.
6
Total Weight Loss as the Outcome Measure of Choice After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后总体重减轻作为首选结局指标
Obes Surg. 2016 Aug;26(8):1794-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-2022-y.
7
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: More than a restrictive bariatric surgery procedure?腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:不仅仅是一种限制性减肥手术?
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 7;21(41):11804-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11804.
8
Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission: the Role of Mini Gastric Bypass/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy at 1 Year of Follow-up. A European survey.减重手术在2型糖尿病缓解中的疗效:迷你胃旁路术/单吻合口胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术在1年随访中的作用。一项欧洲调查。
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):933-40. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1865-6.
9
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013.《2013年全球减肥手术》
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1822-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z.
10
Medium-Term Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Matched Comparison with Gastric Bypass.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的中期结果:与胃旁路术的匹配对照比较
Obes Surg. 2015 Aug;25(8):1431-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1582-1.