Feeney Oliver, Borry Pascal, Felzmann Heike, Galvagni Lucia, Haukkala Ari, Loi Michele, Nordal Salvör, Rakic Vojin, Riso Brígida, Sterckx Sigrid, Vears Danya
Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis, National University of Ireland (Galway), Galway, Republic of Ireland.
Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):133-142. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0342-4. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
The introduction of Web 2.0 technology, along with a population increasingly proficient in Information and Communications Technology (ICT), coupled with the rapid advancements in genetic testing methods, has seen an increase in the presence of participant-centred research initiatives. Such initiatives, aided by the centrality of ICT interconnections, and the ethos they propound seem to further embody the ideal of increasing the participatory nature of research, beyond what might be possible in non-ICT contexts alone. However, the majority of such research seems to actualise a much narrower definition of 'participation'-where it is merely the case that such research initiatives have increased contact with participants through ICT but are otherwise non-participatory in any important normative sense. Furthermore, the rhetoric of participant-centred initiatives tends to inflate this minimalist form of participation into something that it is not, i.e. something genuinely participatory, with greater connections with both the ICT-facilitated political contexts and the largely non-ICT participatory initiatives that have expanded in contemporary health and research contexts. In this paper, we highlight that genuine (ICT-based) 'participation' should enable a reasonable minimum threshold of participatory engagement through, at least, three central participatory elements: educative, sense of being involved and degree of control. While we agree with criticisms that, at present, genuine participation seems more rhetoric than reality, we believe that there is clear potential for a greater ICT-facilitated participatory engagement on all three participatory elements. We outline some practical steps such initiatives could take to further develop these elements and thereby their level of ICT-facilitated participatory engagement.
随着Web 2.0技术的引入,以及民众对信息通信技术(ICT)的熟练掌握程度不断提高,再加上基因检测方法的迅速发展,以参与者为中心的研究计划日益增多。在ICT互联的核心作用以及它们所倡导的理念的帮助下,这些计划似乎进一步体现了增强研究参与性的理想,这超越了仅在非ICT环境中可能实现的程度。然而,此类研究中的大多数似乎实现了对“参与”的更狭义定义——即仅仅是这些研究计划通过ICT增加了与参与者的接触,但在任何重要的规范意义上并非真正具有参与性。此外,以参与者为中心的计划的言辞往往将这种最低限度的参与形式夸大其词,使其变成并非真正参与性的东西,即与ICT推动的政治环境以及在当代健康和研究环境中扩大的主要非ICT参与性计划有更大联系的真正参与性事物。在本文中,我们强调真正的(基于ICT的)“参与”应至少通过三个核心参与要素实现合理的最低参与度门槛:教育性、参与感和控制权。虽然我们认同目前真正的参与似乎更多是言辞而非现实的批评,但我们相信在所有这三个参与要素上,通过ICT促进更大程度的参与具有明显潜力。我们概述了此类计划可以采取的一些实际步骤,以进一步发展这些要素,从而提高其ICT促进的参与度水平。