• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于种族刻板印象偏差对本科临床考试中考官评分、反馈及记忆影响的随机试验。

A randomised trial of the influence of racial stereotype bias on examiners' scores, feedback and recollections in undergraduate clinical exams.

作者信息

Yeates Peter, Woolf Katherine, Benbow Emyr, Davies Ben, Boohan Mairhead, Eva Kevin

机构信息

Medical Education Research, School of Medicine, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Newcastle under Lyme, ST5 5BG, UK.

Acute and Respiratory Medicine at Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Bury, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2017 Oct 25;15(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0943-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-017-0943-0
PMID:29065875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5655938/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Asian medical students and doctors receive lower scores on average than their white counterparts in examinations in the UK and internationally (a phenomenon known as "differential attainment"). This could be due to examiner bias or to social, psychological or cultural influences on learning or performance. We investigated whether students' scores or feedback show influence of ethnicity-related bias; whether examiners unconsciously bring to mind (activate) stereotypes when judging Asian students' performance; whether activation depends on the stereotypicality of students' performances; and whether stereotypes influence examiner memories of performances.

METHODS

This is a randomised, double-blinded, controlled, Internet-based trial. We created near-identical videos of medical student performances on a simulated Objective Structured Clinical Exam using British Asian and white British actors. Examiners were randomly assigned to watch performances from white and Asian students that were either consistent or inconsistent with a previously described stereotype of Asian students' performance. We compared the two examiner groups in terms of the following: the scores and feedback they gave white and Asian students; how much the Asian stereotype was activated in their minds (response times to Asian-stereotypical vs neutral words in a lexical decision task); and whether the stereotype influenced memories of student performances (recognition rates for real vs invented stereotype-consistent vs stereotype-inconsistent phrases from one of the videos).

RESULTS

Examiners responded to Asian-stereotypical words (716 ms, 95% confidence interval (CI) 702-731 ms) faster than neutral words (769 ms, 95% CI 753-786 ms, p < 0.001), suggesting Asian stereotypes were activated (or at least active) in examiners' minds. This occurred regardless of whether examiners observed stereotype-consistent or stereotype-inconsistent performances. Despite this stereotype activation, student ethnicity had no influence on examiners' scores; on the feedback examiners gave; or on examiners' memories for one performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Examiner bias does not appear to explain the differential attainment of Asian students in UK medical schools. Efforts to ensure equality should focus on social, psychological and cultural factors that may disadvantage learning or performance in Asian and other minority ethnic students.

摘要

背景

在英国及国际范围内的考试中,亚洲医学生和医生的平均成绩低于白人同行(这一现象被称为“成绩差异”)。这可能是由于考官偏见,或者是社会、心理或文化对学习或表现的影响。我们调查了学生的成绩或反馈是否显示出与种族相关的偏见影响;考官在评判亚洲学生表现时是否会不自觉地想起(激活)刻板印象;激活是否取决于学生表现的刻板印象程度;以及刻板印象是否会影响考官对表现的记忆。

方法

这是一项基于互联网的随机、双盲、对照试验。我们使用英裔亚裔和英裔白人演员,制作了在模拟客观结构化临床考试中医学生表现的近乎相同的视频。考官被随机分配观看白人学生和亚洲学生的表现,这些表现与先前描述的亚洲学生表现刻板印象一致或不一致。我们在以下方面比较了两组考官:他们给白人和亚洲学生的分数和反馈;亚洲刻板印象在他们脑海中的激活程度(在词汇判断任务中对亚洲刻板印象词与中性词的反应时间);以及刻板印象是否影响对学生表现的记忆(对其中一个视频中真实与虚构的刻板印象一致与刻板印象不一致短语的识别率)。

结果

考官对亚洲刻板印象词的反应时间(716毫秒,95%置信区间(CI)702 - 731毫秒)比对中性词的反应时间(769毫秒,95% CI 753 - 786毫秒,p < 0.001)更快,这表明亚洲刻板印象在考官脑海中被激活(或至少是活跃的)。无论考官观察到的表现是与刻板印象一致还是不一致,这种情况都会发生。尽管有这种刻板印象激活,但学生的种族对考官的分数、考官给出的反馈或考官对一次表现的记忆没有影响。

结论

考官偏见似乎并不能解释英国医学院校中亚洲学生的成绩差异。确保平等的努力应集中在可能使亚洲及其他少数族裔学生在学习或表现上处于不利地位的社会、心理和文化因素上。

相似文献

1
A randomised trial of the influence of racial stereotype bias on examiners' scores, feedback and recollections in undergraduate clinical exams.一项关于种族刻板印象偏差对本科临床考试中考官评分、反馈及记忆影响的随机试验。
BMC Med. 2017 Oct 25;15(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0943-0.
2
A randomised controlled pilot trial of the influence of non-native English accents on examiners' scores in OSCEs.一项关于非英语母语口音对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)考官评分影响的随机对照试验性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 15;20(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02198-y.
3
The ethnicity attainment gap among medical and biomedical science students: a qualitative study.医学和生物医学科学专业学生在族裔归属上的差距:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1426-5.
4
Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.标准化考生:开发一种新工具,以评估影响客观结构化临床考试分数的因素并培训考官。
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Jun 15;37(4):Doc40. doi: 10.3205/zma001333. eCollection 2020.
5
Determining the influence of different linking patterns on the stability of students' score adjustments produced using Video-based Examiner Score Comparison and Adjustment (VESCA).确定不同链接模式对基于视频的考官评分比较和调整(VESCA)产生的学生分数调整稳定性的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 17;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03115-1.
6
Using cultural historical activity theory to reflect on the sociocultural complexities in OSCE examiners' judgements.运用文化历史活动理论反思客观结构化临床考试执考者判断中的社会性文化复杂性。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Mar;28(1):27-46. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10139-1. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Measuring the Effect of Examiner Variability in a Multiple-Circuit Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).测量多站式客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中主考人变异性的效果。
Acad Med. 2021 Aug 1;96(8):1189-1196. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004028. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
Do norms unintentionally increase stereotypical expressions? A randomised controlled trial.规范是否会无意中增加刻板印象表达?一项随机对照试验。
Med Educ. 2022 Mar;56(3):331-338. doi: 10.1111/medu.14712. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
9
Is it them or is it us? Unravelling ethnic disparities in undergraduate clinical performance.是他们还是我们?揭开本科临床表现中的族裔差异。
BMC Med. 2017 Oct 25;15(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0959-5.
10
The influence of candidates' race on examiners' ratings in standardised assessments of clinical practice.候选人的种族对临床实践标准化评估中考官评分的影响。
Med Teach. 2025 Mar;47(3):492-497. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2345266. Epub 2024 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Does candidate race influence simulated patient ratings in standardised assessments of clinical practice? A single-blinded randomised study in UK medical schools.在临床实践标准化评估中,候选人种族会影响模拟患者评分吗?英国医学院校的一项单盲随机研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e080543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080543.
2
An opportunity to be grateful for? Exploring discourses about international medical graduates from India and Pakistan to the UK between 1960 and 1980.一个值得感激的机会?探索 1960 年至 1980 年间,来自印度和巴基斯坦的国际医学毕业生前往英国的相关论述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jun 27;9(6):e014840. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014840.
3
Differential attainment in assessment of postgraduate surgical trainees: a scoping review.研究生外科培训生评估中的差异表现:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 30;24(1):597. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05580-2.
4
Exploring BAME Student Experiences in Healthcare Courses in the United Kingdom: A Systematic Review.探索英国医疗保健课程中黑人和少数族裔学生的经历:一项系统综述。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024 Jan 1;12(1):8-17. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.98882.1825. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Addressing racism in respiratory therapy educational programs: An integrative literature review.应对呼吸治疗教育项目中的种族主义:一项综合文献综述。
Can J Respir Ther. 2022 Jul 26;58:91-97. doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2021-073. eCollection 2022.
6
The influence of candidates' physical attributes on patient ratings in simulated assessments of clinical practice.候选人的身体特征对模拟临床实践评估中患者评分的影响。
Med Teach. 2022 Nov;44(11):1277-1282. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2093177. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
7
Does performance at the intercollegiate Membership of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons (MRCS) examination vary according to UK medical school and course type? A retrospective cohort study.英国皇家外科学院联合会员(MRCS)考试成绩是否因英国医学院校和课程类型而异?一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 5;12(1):e054616. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054616.
8
The do's, don'ts and don't knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools.纠正医学院种族/民族相关差异的方法、禁忌和未知因素。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Jan;11(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00696-3. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
9
Understanding Healthcare Students' Experiences of Racial Bias: A Narrative Review of the Role of Implicit Bias and Potential Interventions in Educational Settings.理解医学生经历的种族偏见:教育环境中隐性偏见的作用及潜在干预措施的叙事综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 3;18(23):12771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312771.
10
Measuring differential attainment: a longitudinal analysis of assessment results for 1512 medical students at four Scottish medical schools.衡量差异成就:对苏格兰四所医学院 1512 名医学生评估结果的纵向分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 3;11(9):e046056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046056.

本文引用的文献

1
Relatively speaking: contrast effects influence assessors' scores and narrative feedback.相对而言:对比效应会影响评估者的评分和叙述性反馈。
Med Educ. 2015 Sep;49(9):909-19. doi: 10.1111/medu.12777.
2
Social cognition.社会认知。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Mar;1(2):160-171. doi: 10.1002/wcs.28. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
3
Impact of rating demands on rater-based assessments of clinical competence.评分要求对基于评分者的临床能力评估的影响。
Educ Prim Care. 2014 Nov;25(6):308-18. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2014.11730760.
4
Bridging the gap: the roles of social capital and ethnicity in medical student achievement.弥合差距:社会资本和种族在医学生成就中的作用。
Med Educ. 2015 Jan;49(1):114-23. doi: 10.1111/medu.12597.
5
MRCGP CSA: are the examiners biased, favouring their own by sex, ethnicity, and degree source?MRCGP CSA:考官是否存在偏见,偏向于自己的性别、种族和学位来源?
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Nov;63(616):e718-25. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X674396.
6
Investigating possible ethnicity and sex bias in clinical examiners: an analysis of data from the MRCP(UK) PACES and nPACES examinations.探讨临床考官中可能存在的种族和性别偏见:对 MRCP(UK)PACES 和 nPACES 考试数据的分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jul 30;13:103. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-103.
7
Ethnic disparities in undergraduate pre-clinical and clinical performance.少数民族学生在本科临床前和临床表现方面的差异。
Med Educ. 2012 Jun;46(6):575-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04265.x.
8
Ethnicity and academic performance in UK trained doctors and medical students: systematic review and meta-analysis.英国培养的医生和医学生的种族与学业表现:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2011 Mar 8;342:d901. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d901.
9
Stereotype threat and health disparities: what medical educators and future physicians need to know.刻板印象威胁与健康差异:医学教育者和未来医生需要了解的内容。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 May;25 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S169-77. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1221-4.
10
Relatively fast! Efficiency advantages of comparative thinking.相对较快!比较思维的效率优势。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Feb;138(1):1-21. doi: 10.1037/a0014374.