Department of Medical Education, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):324-330.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
Periprosthetic fractures (PPFX) around total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are devastating complications with significant morbidity. With growing healthcare costs, hospital readmissions have become a marker for quality healthcare delivery. However, little is known about the risk factors or costs associated with readmission after treatment of PPFX. We sought to identify the patient demographics, prevalence of treatment types (open reduction internal fixation [ORIF] vs revision TKA), 30 and 90-day readmission rates, costs of initial treatment and readmission, and risk factors for readmission.
We used the 2013 Nationwide Readmissions Database to select patients who underwent TKA, revision TKA, and treatment of PPFX with either ORIF or revision TKA. The 90-day readmission rate was determined through a survival analysis, and risk factors were identified using a cox proportional hazards model that adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics.
We identified 1526 patients with PPFX treated with ORIF and 1458 treated with revision TKA. Ninety-day readmissions were 20.5% and 21.8%, respectively. Patients with ORIF were more often female and had multiple medical comorbidities. Patient factors associated with readmission included advanced age, male gender, comorbidities, discharge to a skilled nursing facility or home with health aide, and Medicare or Medicaid insurance. Treatment at a teaching hospital was the only hospital-associated risk factor identified. ORIF cost USD 25,539 and revision THA cost USD 37,680, with associated readmissions costing 15,269 and 16,806, respectively.
PPFX results in greater costs compared to primary and revision TKA. This study highlights risk factors for readmission after PPFX treatment.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)周围的假体周围骨折(PPFX)是一种破坏性的并发症,具有显著的发病率。随着医疗保健成本的不断增长,医院再入院已成为医疗保健服务质量的标志。然而,对于 PPFX 治疗后再入院的相关风险因素或成本知之甚少。我们旨在确定患者人口统计学特征、治疗类型(切开复位内固定术 [ORIF] 与翻修 TKA)的患病率、30 天和 90 天再入院率、初始治疗和再入院的成本,以及再入院的风险因素。
我们使用 2013 年全国再入院数据库选择接受 TKA、翻修 TKA 以及接受 ORIF 或翻修 TKA 治疗的 PPFX 的患者。通过生存分析确定 90 天再入院率,并使用 Cox 比例风险模型确定风险因素,该模型调整了患者和医院特征。
我们确定了 1526 例接受 ORIF 治疗和 1458 例接受翻修 TKA 治疗的 PPFX 患者。90 天再入院率分别为 20.5%和 21.8%。接受 ORIF 治疗的患者更常为女性,且合并多种医学合并症。与再入院相关的患者因素包括年龄较大、男性、合并症、出院至疗养院或有健康助手的家庭,以及医疗保险或医疗补助保险。在教学医院接受治疗是唯一确定的医院相关风险因素。ORIF 的治疗费用为 25539 美元,翻修 THA 的治疗费用为 37680 美元,相应的再入院费用分别为 15269 美元和 16806 美元。
与初次 TKA 和翻修 TKA 相比,PPFX 的成本更高。本研究强调了 PPFX 治疗后再入院的风险因素。