Suppr超能文献

腰椎手术中脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的效果比较:对544例患者的回顾性分析

Efficiency of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for lumbar spinal surgery: a retrospective analysis of 544 patients.

作者信息

Pierce John T, Kositratna Guy, Attiah Mark A, Kallan Michael J, Koenigsberg Rebecca, Syre Peter, Wyler David, Marcotte Paul J, Kofke W Andrew, Welch William C

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care.

出版信息

Local Reg Anesth. 2017 Oct 10;10:91-98. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S141233. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown varying results in selected outcomes when directly comparing spinal anesthesia to general in lumbar surgery. Some studies have shown reduced surgical time, postoperative pain, time in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), incidence of urinary retention, postoperative nausea, and more favorable cost-effectiveness with spinal anesthesia. Despite these results, the current literature has also shown contradictory results in between-group comparisons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed by querying the electronic medical record database for surgeries performed by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2011 using procedural codes 63030 for diskectomy and 63047 for laminectomy: 544 lumbar laminectomy and diskectomy surgeries were identified, with 183 undergoing general anesthesia and 361 undergoing spinal anesthesia (SA). Linear and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify differences in blood loss, operative time, time from entering the operating room (OR) until incision, time from bandage placement to exiting the OR, total anesthesia time, PACU time, and total hospital stay. Secondary outcomes of interest included incidence of postoperative spinal hematoma and death, incidence of paraparesis, plegia, post-dural puncture headache, and paresthesia, among the SA patients.

RESULTS

SA was associated with significantly lower operative time, blood loss, total anesthesia time, time from entering the OR until incision, time from bandage placement until exiting the OR, and total duration of hospital stay, but a longer stay in the PACU. The SA group experienced one spinal hematoma, which was evacuated without any long-term neurological deficits, and neither group experienced a death. The SA group had no episodes of paraparesis or plegia, post-dural puncture headaches, or episodes of persistent postoperative paresthesia or weakness.

CONCLUSION

SA is effective for use in patients undergoing elective lumbar laminectomy and/or diskectomy spinal surgery, and was shown to be the more expedient anesthetic choice in the perioperative setting.

摘要

背景

以往研究在直接比较腰椎手术中脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的特定结局时,结果各异。一些研究表明,脊髓麻醉可缩短手术时间、减轻术后疼痛、减少在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的停留时间、降低尿潴留发生率、减少术后恶心,且成本效益更佳。尽管有这些结果,但当前文献在组间比较中也显示出相互矛盾的结果。

材料与方法

通过查询电子病历数据库进行回顾性分析,该数据库记录了2007年至2011年期间由一位外科医生实施的手术,使用手术编码63030表示椎间盘切除术,63047表示椎板切除术:共识别出544例腰椎椎板切除术和椎间盘切除术,其中183例接受全身麻醉,361例接受脊髓麻醉(SA)。进行线性和多变量回归分析,以确定失血、手术时间、从进入手术室(OR)到切开的时间、从包扎到离开手术室的时间、总麻醉时间、PACU时间和总住院时间的差异。感兴趣的次要结局包括SA患者术后脊髓血肿和死亡的发生率、轻瘫、截瘫、硬膜穿刺后头痛和感觉异常的发生率。

结果

SA与显著更低的手术时间、失血量、总麻醉时间、从进入手术室到切开的时间、从包扎到离开手术室的时间以及总住院时间相关,但在PACU的停留时间更长。SA组发生1例脊髓血肿,经引流后未出现任何长期神经功能缺损,两组均未发生死亡。SA组未出现轻瘫或截瘫、硬膜穿刺后头痛或持续性术后感觉异常或无力的情况。

结论

SA可有效用于接受择期腰椎椎板切除术和/或椎间盘切除术脊柱手术的患者,并且在围手术期是更便捷的麻醉选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/371a/5644537/298b863f5f8c/lra-10-091Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验