• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于为何目标在预测任务中会引发P3成分:对预测任务和匹配任务进行类比

On Why Targets Evoke P3 Components in Prediction Tasks: Drawing an Analogy between Prediction and Matching Tasks.

作者信息

Verleger Rolf, Cäsar Stephanie, Siller Bastian, Śmigasiewicz Kamila

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Institute of Psychology II, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Oct 10;11:497. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00497. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00497
PMID:29066965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5641317/
Abstract

P3 is the most conspicuous component in recordings of stimulus-evoked EEG potentials from the human scalp, occurring whenever some task has to be performed with the stimuli. The process underlying P3 has been assumed to be the updating of expectancies. More recently, P3 has been related to decision processing and to activation of established stimulus-response associations (S/R-link hypothesis). However, so far this latter approach has not provided a conception about how to explain the occurrence of P3 with predicted stimuli, although P3 was originally discovered in a prediction task. The present article proposes such a conception. We assume that the internal responses or both become associatively linked to each predicted target and that one of these two response alternatives gets activated as a function of match or mismatch of the target to the preceding prediction. This seems similar to comparison tasks where responses depend on the matching of the target stimulus with a preceding first stimulus (S1). Based on this idea, this study compared the effects of frequencies of first events (predictions or S1) on target-evoked P3s in prediction and comparison tasks. Indeed, frequencies not only of targets but also of first events had similar effects across tasks on target-evoked P3s. These results support the notion that P3 evoked by predicted stimuli reflects activation of appropriate internal "match" or "mismatch" responses, which is compatible with S/R-link hypothesis.

摘要

P3是从人类头皮记录的刺激诱发脑电图电位中最显著的成分,每当必须对刺激执行某些任务时就会出现。P3背后的过程被认为是预期的更新。最近,P3与决策过程以及已建立的刺激-反应关联的激活(S/R链接假说)有关。然而,到目前为止,后一种方法尚未提供关于如何用预测刺激来解释P3出现的概念,尽管P3最初是在一个预测任务中发现的。本文提出了这样一种概念。我们假设内部反应或两者都与每个预测目标形成联想联系,并且这两种反应选择之一会根据目标与先前预测的匹配或不匹配而被激活。这似乎类似于比较任务,其中反应取决于目标刺激与先前的第一个刺激(S1)的匹配。基于这一想法,本研究比较了第一个事件(预测或S1)的频率对预测和比较任务中目标诱发P3的影响。事实上,不仅目标的频率,而且第一个事件的频率在不同任务中对目标诱发P3都有类似的影响。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即由预测刺激诱发的P3反映了适当的内部“匹配”或“不匹配”反应的激活,这与S/R链接假说相符。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0890/5641317/51031bd15dfb/fnhum-11-00497-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0890/5641317/2f7c4683ec39/fnhum-11-00497-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0890/5641317/9929b5243138/fnhum-11-00497-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0890/5641317/d5112319d5a2/fnhum-11-00497-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0890/5641317/51031bd15dfb/fnhum-11-00497-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0890/5641317/2f7c4683ec39/fnhum-11-00497-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0890/5641317/9929b5243138/fnhum-11-00497-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0890/5641317/d5112319d5a2/fnhum-11-00497-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0890/5641317/51031bd15dfb/fnhum-11-00497-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
On Why Targets Evoke P3 Components in Prediction Tasks: Drawing an Analogy between Prediction and Matching Tasks.关于为何目标在预测任务中会引发P3成分:对预测任务和匹配任务进行类比
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Oct 10;11:497. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00497. eCollection 2017.
2
Do Rare Stimuli Evoke Large P3s by Being Unexpected? A Comparison of Oddball Effects Between Standard-Oddball and Prediction-Oddball Tasks.罕见刺激是否因其意外性而引发较大的P3波?标准奇偶数任务与预测奇偶数任务中奇偶数效应的比较。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;12(2):88-104. doi: 10.5709/acp-0189-9. eCollection 2016.
3
Biased odds for heads or tails: Outcome-evoked P3 depends on frequencies of guesses.正面或反面的偏向概率:结果诱发的P3取决于猜测的频率。
Psychophysiology. 2015 Aug;52(8):1048-58. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12440. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
Is P3 a strategic or a tactical component? Relationships of P3 sub-components to response times in oddball tasks with go, no-go and choice responses.P3 是战略成分还是战术成分?在包含 Go、No-Go 和选择反应的探测任务中,P3 子成分与反应时的关系。
Neuroimage. 2016 Dec;143:223-234. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.049. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
Functional Dissociation of Latency-Variable, Stimulus- and Response-Locked Target P3 Sub-components in Task-Switching.任务切换中潜伏期可变、刺激和反应锁定目标P3子成分的功能分离
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 20;12:60. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00060. eCollection 2018.
6
Suspense and surprise: on the relationship between expectancies and P3.悬念与惊喜:关于预期与P3之间的关系
Psychophysiology. 1994 Jul;31(4):359-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02444.x.
7
Go and no-go P3 with rare and frequent stimuli in oddball tasks: A study comparing key-pressing with counting.异常球任务中稀有和频繁刺激下的对特定刺激做出或不做出反应的P3:一项比较按键与计数的研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Dec;110:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
8
Testing the S-R link hypothesis of P3b: The oddball effect on S1-evoked P3 gets reduced by increased task relevance of S2.检验P3b的S-R联结假说:通过增加S2的任务相关性,对S1诱发的P3的奇异性效应会降低。
Biol Psychol. 2015 May;108:25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
9
Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300.前后联合皮层对体感P300的作用。
J Neurosci. 1991 Jul;11(7):2039-54. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-07-02039.1991.
10
Effect of task decision on P300.任务决策对P300的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 1992 Jul;13(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(92)90018-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Intention-based and sensory-based predictions.基于意图的预测和基于感觉的预测。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 6;11(1):19899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99445-z.
2
Outcome saliency modulates behavioral decision switching.结果凸显度调节行为决策转换。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 31;10(1):14288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71182-9.
3
The neural basis of feedback-guided behavioral adjustment.反馈引导行为调整的神经基础。

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of response delays and of unknown stimulus-response mappings on the oddball effect on P3.反应延迟及未知刺激-反应映射对P3事件相关电位中奇异性效应的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Dec;53(12):1858-1869. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12756. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
2
Is P3 a strategic or a tactical component? Relationships of P3 sub-components to response times in oddball tasks with go, no-go and choice responses.P3 是战略成分还是战术成分?在包含 Go、No-Go 和选择反应的探测任务中,P3 子成分与反应时的关系。
Neuroimage. 2016 Dec;143:223-234. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.049. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
3
Do Rare Stimuli Evoke Large P3s by Being Unexpected? A Comparison of Oddball Effects Between Standard-Oddball and Prediction-Oddball Tasks.
Neurosci Lett. 2020 Sep 25;736:135243. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135243. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
4
Decision Making and Oddball Effects on Pupil Size: Evidence for a Sequential Process.决策制定与瞳孔大小的异常球效应:顺序过程的证据。
J Cogn. 2020 Mar 27;3(1):7. doi: 10.5334/joc.96.
5
Predictive coding and adaptive behavior in patients with genetically determined cerebellar ataxia--A neurophysiology study.遗传性小脑共济失调患者的预测编码和适应性行为——一项神经生理学研究。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102043. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102043. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
罕见刺激是否因其意外性而引发较大的P3波?标准奇偶数任务与预测奇偶数任务中奇偶数效应的比较。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;12(2):88-104. doi: 10.5709/acp-0189-9. eCollection 2016.
4
Abstract and Effector-Selective Decision Signals Exhibit Qualitatively Distinct Dynamics before Delayed Perceptual Reports.摘要和效应器选择性决策信号在延迟的知觉报告之前呈现出质的不同的动态变化。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jul 13;36(28):7346-52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4162-15.2016.
5
N2 and P3 modulation during partial inhibition in a modified go/nogo task.改良版“是/否”任务中部分抑制期间的N2和P3调制
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Sep;107:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
6
Dissociating working memory updating and automatic updating: The reference-back paradigm.区分工作记忆更新与自动更新:回溯范式。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jun;42(6):951-969. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000219. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Event-related EEG responses to anticipation and delivery of monetary and social reward.与事件相关的脑电图对金钱和社会奖励的预期及给予的反应。
Biol Psychol. 2015 Jul;109:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
8
Biased odds for heads or tails: Outcome-evoked P3 depends on frequencies of guesses.正面或反面的偏向概率:结果诱发的P3取决于猜测的频率。
Psychophysiology. 2015 Aug;52(8):1048-58. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12440. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
Why do we make mistakes? Neurocognitive processes during the preparation-perception-action cycle and error-detection.我们为什么会犯错?准备-感知-行动循环及错误检测过程中的神经认知过程。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jun;113:320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.040. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
10
The hard oddball: effects of difficult response selection on stimulus-related P3 and on response-related negative potentials.困难的怪球:困难反应选择对刺激相关P3及反应相关负电位的影响
Psychophysiology. 2014 Nov;51(11):1089-100. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12262. Epub 2014 Jul 1.