Sheridan David A, Aithal Guru, Alazawi William, Allison Michael, Anstee Quentin, Cobbold Jeremy, Khan Shahid, Fowell Andrew, McPherson Stuart, Newsome Philip N, Oben Jude, Tomlinson Jeremy, Tsochatzis Emmanouil
Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK.
Biomedical Research Unit, NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases, Nottingham, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;8(4):252-259. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100806. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Guidelines for the assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have been published in 2016 by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and European Associations for the study of the Liver-European Association for the study of Diabetes-European Association for the study of Obesity. Prior to publication of these guidelines, we performed a cross-sectional survey of gastroenterologists and hepatologists regarding NAFLD diagnosis and management.
An online survey was circulated to members of British Association for the Study of the Liver and British Society of Gastroenterology between February 2016 and May 2016.
175 gastroenterologists/hepatologists responded, 116 completing the survey, representing 84 UK centres. 22% had local NAFLD guidelines. 45% received >300 referrals per year from primary care for investigation of abnormal liver function tests (LFTs). Clinical assessment tended to be performed in secondary rather than primary care including body mass index (82% vs 26%) and non-invasive liver screen (86% vs 32%) and ultrasound (81% vs 37%). Widely used tools for non-invasive fibrosis risk stratification were aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio (53%), Fibroscan (50%) and NAFLD fibrosis score (41%). 78% considered liver biopsy in selected cases. 50% recommended 10% weight loss target as first-line treatment. Delivery of lifestyle interventions was mostly handed back to primary care (56%). A minority have direct access to community weight management services (22%). Follow-up was favoured by F3/4 fibrosis (72.9%), and high-risk non-invasive fibrosis tests (51%). Discharge was favoured by simple steatosis at biopsy (30%), and low-risk non-invasive scores (25%).
The survey highlights areas for improvement of service provision for NAFLD assessment including improved recognition of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in people with type 2 diabetes, streamlining abnormal LFT referral pathways, defining non-invasive liver fibrosis assessment tools, use of liver biopsy, managing metabolic syndrome features and improved access to lifestyle interventions.
英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所及欧洲肝脏研究学会 - 欧洲糖尿病研究学会 - 欧洲肥胖研究学会于2016年发布了非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)评估指南。在这些指南发布之前,我们针对NAFLD的诊断和管理对胃肠病学家和肝病学家进行了一项横断面调查。
2016年2月至2016年5月期间,向英国肝脏研究协会和英国胃肠病学会的成员发放了一份在线调查问卷。
175名胃肠病学家/肝病学家回复,116人完成调查,代表84个英国中心。22%有当地的NAFLD指南。45%每年从初级保健机构收到超过300例因肝功能检查(LFTs)异常而进行检查的转诊。临床评估倾向于在二级而非初级保健机构进行,包括体重指数(82%对26%)、非侵入性肝脏筛查(86%对32%)和超声检查(81%对37%)。广泛使用的非侵入性纤维化风险分层工具是天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)/丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)比值(53%)、Fibroscan(50%)和NAFLD纤维化评分(41%)。78%在特定病例中考虑进行肝活检。50%推荐将体重减轻10%作为一线治疗目标。生活方式干预的实施大多交回给初级保健机构(56%)。少数人可直接获得社区体重管理服务(22%)。F3/4纤维化(72.9%)和高风险非侵入性纤维化检测结果(51%)的患者倾向于接受随访。活检为单纯性脂肪变性(30%)和低风险非侵入性评分(25%)的患者倾向于出院。
该调查突出了NAFLD评估服务提供方面有待改进的领域,包括提高对2型糖尿病患者中非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的认识、简化异常LFT转诊途径、确定非侵入性肝脏纤维化评估工具、使用肝活检、管理代谢综合征特征以及改善获得生活方式干预的机会。