Phakaratsakul Supinya, Sirihongthong Thanyaporn, Boonarkart Chompunuch, Suptawiwat Ornpreya, Auewarakul Prasert
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Research and International Relations Division, HRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand.
Arch Virol. 2018 Feb;163(2):337-348. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3597-5. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Codon usage bias can be a result of either mutational bias or selection for translational efficiency and/or accuracy. Previous data has suggested that nucleotide composition constraint was the main determinant of HIV codon usage, and that nucleotide composition and codon usage were different between the regulatory genes, tat and rev, and other viral genes. It is not clear whether translational selection contributed to the codon usage difference and how nucleotide composition and translational selection interact to determine HIV codon usage. In this study, a model of codon bias due to GC composition with modification for the A-rich third codon position was used to calculate predicted HIV codon frequencies based on its nucleotide composition. The predicted codon usage of each gene was compared with the actual codon frequency. The predicted codon usage based on GC composition matched well with the actual codon frequencies for the structural genes (gag, pol and env). However, the codon usage of the regulatory genes (tat and rev) could not be predicted. Codon usage of the regulatory genes was also relatively unbiased showing the highest effective number of codons (ENC). Moreover, the codon adaptation index (CAI) of the regulatory genes showed better adaptation to human codons when compared to other HIV genes. Therefore, the early expressed genes responsible for regulation of the replication cycle, tat and rev, were more similar to humans in terms of codon usage and GC content than other HIV genes. This may help these genes to be expressed efficiently during the early stages of infection.
密码子使用偏好可能是突变偏好或对翻译效率和/或准确性进行选择的结果。先前的数据表明,核苷酸组成限制是HIV密码子使用的主要决定因素,并且在调节基因tat和rev与其他病毒基因之间,核苷酸组成和密码子使用情况有所不同。目前尚不清楚翻译选择是否导致了密码子使用差异,以及核苷酸组成和翻译选择如何相互作用来决定HIV的密码子使用。在本研究中,使用了一个基于GC组成并对富含A的第三密码子位置进行修正的密码子偏好模型,根据HIV的核苷酸组成来计算预测的密码子频率。将每个基因的预测密码子使用情况与实际密码子频率进行比较。基于GC组成的预测密码子使用情况与结构基因(gag、pol和env)的实际密码子频率匹配良好。然而,调节基因(tat和rev)的密码子使用情况无法预测。调节基因的密码子使用也相对无偏好,显示出最高的有效密码子数(ENC)。此外,与其他HIV基因相比,调节基因的密码子适应指数(CAI)显示出对人类密码子更好的适应性。因此,负责调节复制周期的早期表达基因tat和rev,在密码子使用和GC含量方面比其他HIV基因更类似于人类。这可能有助于这些基因在感染早期高效表达。