Yanqi Lake Beijing Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Applications (BIMSA), Beijing, China.
School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jan 25;12:1085397. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1085397. eCollection 2022.
Comprehensive identification of possible target cells for viruses is crucial for understanding the pathological mechanism of virosis. The susceptibility of cells to viruses depends on many factors. Besides the existence of receptors at the cell surface, effective expression of viral genes is also pivotal for viral infection. The regulation of viral gene expression is a multilevel process including transcription, translational initiation and translational elongation. At the translational elongation level, the translational efficiency of viral mRNAs mainly depends on the match between their codon composition and cellular translational machinery (usually referred to as codon adaptation). Thus, codon adaptation for viral ORFs in different cell types may be related to their susceptibility to viruses. In this study, we selected the codon adaptation index (CAI) which is a common codon adaptation-based indicator for assessing the translational efficiency at the translational elongation level to evaluate the susceptibility to two-pandemic viruses (HIV-1 and SARS-CoV-2) of different human cell types. Compared with previous studies that evaluated the infectivity of viruses based on codon adaptation, the main advantage of our study is that our analysis is refined to the cell-type level. At first, we verified the positive correlation between CAI and translational efficiency and strengthened the rationality of our research method. Then we calculated CAI for ORFs of two viruses in various human cell types. We found that compared to high-expression endogenous genes, the CAIs of viral ORFs are relatively low. This phenomenon implied that two kinds of viruses have not been well adapted to translational regulatory machinery in human cells. Also, we indicated that presumptive susceptibility to viruses according to CAI is usually consistent with the results of experimental research. However, there are still some exceptions. Finally, we found that two viruses have different effects on cellular translational mechanisms. HIV-1 decouples CAI and translational efficiency of endogenous genes in host cells and SARS-CoV-2 exhibits increased CAI for its ORFs in infected cells. Our results implied that at least in cases of HIV-1 and SARS-CoV-2, CAI can be regarded as an auxiliary index to assess cells' susceptibility to viruses but cannot be used as the only evidence to identify viral target cells.
全面鉴定病毒的潜在靶细胞对于理解病毒致病机制至关重要。细胞对病毒的易感性取决于许多因素。除了细胞表面存在受体外,病毒基因的有效表达对于病毒感染也是至关重要的。病毒基因表达的调控是一个多层次的过程,包括转录、翻译起始和翻译延伸。在翻译延伸水平上,病毒 mRNA 的翻译效率主要取决于其密码子组成与细胞翻译机制的匹配程度(通常称为密码子适应性)。因此,不同细胞类型中病毒 ORF 的密码子适应性可能与其对病毒的易感性有关。在本研究中,我们选择了密码子适应指数(CAI)作为评估翻译延伸水平翻译效率的常用基于密码子适应性的指标,以评估不同人类细胞类型对两种大流行病毒(HIV-1 和 SARS-CoV-2)的易感性。与以前基于密码子适应性评估病毒感染性的研究相比,本研究的主要优势在于我们的分析细化到了细胞类型水平。首先,我们验证了 CAI 与翻译效率之间的正相关性,从而加强了我们研究方法的合理性。然后,我们计算了两种病毒在各种人类细胞类型中的 ORF 的 CAI。我们发现,与高表达的内源性基因相比,病毒 ORF 的 CAI 相对较低。这一现象表明,两种病毒尚未很好地适应人类细胞中的翻译调控机制。此外,我们表明,根据 CAI 推断的病毒易感性通常与实验研究的结果一致。然而,仍存在一些例外。最后,我们发现两种病毒对细胞翻译机制有不同的影响。HIV-1 使宿主细胞中内源性基因的 CAI 和翻译效率解耦,而 SARS-CoV-2 则在感染细胞中增加了其 ORF 的 CAI。我们的结果表明,至少在 HIV-1 和 SARS-CoV-2 的情况下,可以将 CAI 视为评估细胞对病毒易感性的辅助指标,但不能将其作为识别病毒靶细胞的唯一证据。