• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗高血压药物引发新发糖尿病的比较风险:一项网状Meta分析。

Comparative risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus for antihypertensive drugs: A network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Li Zimeng, Li Yi, Liu Yulong, Xu Wenbo, Wang Qing

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Dec;19(12):1348-1356. doi: 10.1111/jch.13108. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1111/jch.13108
PMID:29067768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8030754/
Abstract

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NOD) refers to forms of diabetes mellitus that develop during the therapeutic processes of other diseases such as hypertension. This study has been conducted in a network meta-analysis to compare antihypertensive drugs by identifying both the advantages and disadvantages on NOD by focusing on their respective effect rates. Odd ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals or credible intervals were calculated within pairwise and network meta-analysis. A total of 38 articles with 224 140 patients were included to evaluate the preventive effect of hypertension drugs on NOD. From the network meta-analysis it was evident that both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor as well as angiotensin receptor blocker treatments are associated with a lower risk of developing NOD compared with placebo, with ranking probabilities of 79.81% and 72.77%, respectively, while β-blockers and calcium channel blockers may significantly increase the probability of developing NOD (β-blockers: odds ratio, 2.18 [95% credible intervals: 1.36-3.50]; calcium channel blockers: odds ratio, 1.16 [95% credible intervals, 1.05-1.29]). In conclusion, angiotensin receptor blockers have an advantage over the other treatments regarding the NOD.

摘要

新发糖尿病(NOD)是指在诸如高血压等其他疾病的治疗过程中发生的糖尿病类型。本研究通过网络荟萃分析进行,旨在通过关注各类降压药物导致NOD的发生率,来比较它们的优缺点,识别其各自的优劣之处。在成对分析和网络荟萃分析中计算了比值比及相应的95%置信区间或可信区间。总共纳入了38篇文章,涉及224140名患者,以评估高血压药物对NOD的预防效果。从网络荟萃分析中可以明显看出,与安慰剂相比,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗发生NOD的风险较低,其排序概率分别为79.81%和72.77%,而β受体阻滞剂和钙通道阻滞剂可能会显著增加发生NOD的概率(β受体阻滞剂:比值比为2.18 [95%可信区间:1.36 - 3.50];钙通道阻滞剂:比值比为1.16 [95%可信区间:1.05 - 1.29])。总之,在新发糖尿病方面,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂比其他治疗方法具有优势。

相似文献

1
Comparative risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus for antihypertensive drugs: A network meta-analysis.抗高血压药物引发新发糖尿病的比较风险:一项网状Meta分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Dec;19(12):1348-1356. doi: 10.1111/jch.13108. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
2
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.用于多发性硬化症的免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD008933. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008933.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Oral beta-blockers for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy.孕期轻至中度高血压的口服β受体阻滞剂治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2003(4):CD002863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002863.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 20;1(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub5.
7
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
10
Systematic review on urine albumin testing for early detection of diabetic complications.关于尿白蛋白检测用于早期发现糖尿病并发症的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Aug;9(30):iii-vi, xiii-163. doi: 10.3310/hta9300.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and Risk Factors for Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Acute Myocardial Infarction-A Long-Term Follow-Up.急性心肌梗死后发生2型糖尿病的发病率及危险因素——一项长期随访研究
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 28;12(3):89. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12030089.
2
Four-year changes in central fatness, risk of diabetes, and metabolic control in older adults: a cohort study with mediation analysis.老年人中心性肥胖、糖尿病风险和代谢控制的四年变化:一项中介分析队列研究。
Korean J Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):230-240. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.629. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
3
Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2019.《2019年日本糖尿病临床实践指南》
J Diabetes Investig. 2020 Jul;11(4):1020-1076. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13306.
4
Fixed-dose combination of amlodipine and atorvastatin improves clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia.氨氯地平阿托伐他汀固定剂量复方制剂改善高血压伴血脂异常患者的临床结局。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Oct;22(10):1846-1853. doi: 10.1111/jch.14016. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
5
Japanese Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes 2019.《2019年日本糖尿病临床实践指南》
Diabetol Int. 2020 Jul 24;11(3):165-223. doi: 10.1007/s13340-020-00439-5. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
Comparative risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus for antihypertensive drugs in elderly: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.比较老年人群中抗高血压药物新发糖尿病的风险:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Aug;21(8):1082-1090. doi: 10.1111/jch.13598. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension and the Role of Olmesartan.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗动脉高血压及奥美沙坦的作用
Adv Ther. 2019 Feb;36(2):278-297. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0859-x. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
8
Comparison of Clinical and Physiological Parameters for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients.高血压患者与血压正常患者良性前列腺增生的临床和生理参数比较。
Front Physiol. 2018 Sep 24;9:1330. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01330. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Antihypertensive Drug Use and New-Onset Diabetes in Female Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Population-based Longitudinal Cohort Study.冠心病女性患者中抗高血压药物使用与新发糖尿病:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(36):e1495. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001495.
2
Update on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Light of Recent Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.基于最新证据的2型糖尿病成年患者心血管疾病预防最新进展:美国心脏协会和美国糖尿病协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2015 Aug 25;132(8):691-718. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000230. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
3
Cost-utility of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based treatment compared with thiazide diuretic-based treatment for hypertension in elderly Australians considering diabetes as comorbidity.对于合并糖尿病的澳大利亚老年人,基于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的治疗与基于噻嗪类利尿剂的治疗在高血压治疗中的成本效益比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Mar;94(9):e590. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000590.
4
Diabetes and CVD risk during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker treatment in hypertension: a study of 15,990 patients.高血压患者接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂治疗期间的糖尿病和心血管疾病风险:一项针对15990名患者的研究
J Hum Hypertens. 2014 Nov;28(11):663-9. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2014.43. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
5
Short- and long-term survival in treated elderly hypertensive patients with or without diabetes: findings from the Second Australian National Blood Pressure study.治疗中老年高血压患者(无论是否合并糖尿病)的短期和长期生存情况:来自第二次澳大利亚国家血压研究的结果。
Am J Hypertens. 2014 Feb;27(2):199-206. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt212. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
6
Long-term effects of incident diabetes mellitus on cardiovascular outcomes in people treated for hypertension: the ALLHAT Diabetes Extension Study.新发糖尿病对高血压治疗患者心血管结局的长期影响:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验糖尿病扩展研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):153-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.962522. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
7
Effects of telmisartan on glucose levels in people at high risk for cardiovascular disease but free from diabetes: the TRANSCEND study.替米沙坦对无糖尿病心血管疾病高危人群血糖水平的影响:TRANSCEND 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):1902-7. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0545. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
8
New-onset diabetes and antihypertensive treatment.新发糖尿病与降压治疗。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2010 Mar 16;6:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/hta000081.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 声明和发表偏倚。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;39(2):91-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
10
Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial.呈现多处理荟萃分析结果的图形方法和数值总结:概述和教程。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;64(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 Aug 5.