Suppr超能文献

比较老年人群中抗高血压药物新发糖尿病的风险:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

Comparative risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus for antihypertensive drugs in elderly: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Linyi Central Hospital, Linyi City, China.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Aug;21(8):1082-1090. doi: 10.1111/jch.13598. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

Abstract

There is no study to compare different class of antihypertensive drugs on new-onset diabetes mellitus (NOD) in elderly. We aimed to investigate the risk of antihypertensive drugs on NOD in elderly patients. The databases were retrieved in an orderly manner from the dates of their establishment to October, 2018, including Medline, Embase, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Database, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of different antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients (age > 60 years). Then, a network meta-analysis was conducted using R and Stata 12.0 softwares. A total of 14 RCTs involving 74 042 patients were included. The relative risk of NOD mellitus associated with six classes of antihypertensive drugs was analyzed, including placebo, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), diuretics, and β blockers. Patients with ACEIs or ARBs appeared to have significantly reduced risk of NOD compare with placebo: ACEIs (OR = 0.49, 95% CrI 0.28-0.85), ARBs (OR = 0.37, 95% CrI 0.26-0.52), while CCBs, diuretics, and β blockers appeared to have not significantly reduced risk of NOD mellitus compare with placebo: CCBs (OR = 1.10, 95% CrI 0.85-1.60), diuretics (OR = 1.40, 95% CrI 0.92-2.50), β blockers (OR = 1.40, 95% CrI 0.93-2.10). The SUCRA of placebo, ACEIs, ARBs, CCBs, diuretics, and β blockers was, respectively, 65.3%, 69.3%, 92.3%, 44.1%, 12.1%, and 16.5%. According to the evidence, ARBs have an advantage over the other treatments in reducing the risk of NOD in elderly patients.

摘要

目前尚无研究比较不同类别的降压药物在老年新发糖尿病(NOD)方面的作用。本研究旨在探讨降压药物对老年患者 NOD 的影响。系统检索了建库至 2018 年 10 月 Medline、Embase、ClinicalTrials 及 Cochrane 等数据库,收集了降压药物治疗老年患者(年龄>60 岁)的随机对照试验(RCT),采用 R 和 Stata 12.0 软件进行网状 Meta 分析。共纳入 14 项 RCT,涉及 74042 例患者。分析了 6 类降压药物与 NOD 相关的相对风险,包括安慰剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ARB)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)、利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂。与安慰剂相比,ACEI 或 ARB 可显著降低 NOD 风险:ACEI(OR=0.49,95%CrI 0.28-0.85),ARB(OR=0.37,95%CrI 0.26-0.52),而 CCB、利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂与安慰剂相比并未显著降低 NOD 风险:CCB(OR=1.10,95%CrI 0.85-1.60),利尿剂(OR=1.40,95%CrI 0.92-2.50),β受体阻滞剂(OR=1.40,95%CrI 0.93-2.10)。安慰剂、ACEI、ARB、CCB、利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂的 SUCRA 分别为 65.3%、69.3%、92.3%、44.1%、12.1%和 16.5%。ARB 可能降低老年患者 NOD 风险优于其他治疗。

相似文献

3
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 20;1(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub5.

本文引用的文献

9
Mechanistic insights into diuretic-induced insulin resistance.利尿剂诱发胰岛素抵抗的机制性见解。
Hypertension. 2008 Dec;52(6):1009-11. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.120923. Epub 2008 Nov 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验