a Department of Psychiatry , Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine , Busan , Korea.
b Shim Joo Cheol Psychiatry Clinic , Busan , Korea.
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Jan;23(1):46-52. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1393796. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
To assess the usefulness of the University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) as a new diagnostic method and tool for the assessment of cognitive function and activities of daily living function in patients with cognitive impairment.
In total, 35 patients with cognitive impairment and 35 healthy controls were recruited for this study. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) were used for the evaluation of cognitive function, while the Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index (BADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Index (IADL), and UPSA were used for the evaluation of activities of daily living function.
UPSA scores were significantly lower in patients with cognitive impairment than in controls. The UPSA total score was significantly correlated with MMSE, CDR, GDS, and IADL scores. With regard to the detection of cognitive impairment, UPSA exhibited a greater determination power (R = 0.593) compared with BADL (R = 0.149) and IADL (R = 0.423) and higher sensitivity and specificity compared with IADL.
Our results suggest that UPSA is a useful tool for the evaluation of cognitive function and activities of daily living function in patients with cognitive impairment.
评估加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥表现性技能评估(UPSA)作为一种新的诊断方法和工具,用于评估认知功能障碍患者的认知功能和日常生活活动功能。
本研究共纳入 35 名认知功能障碍患者和 35 名健康对照者。采用简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)和总体衰退量表(GDS)评估认知功能,采用巴氏日常生活活动指数(BADL)、工具性日常生活活动指数(IADL)和 UPSA 评估日常生活活动功能。
认知功能障碍患者的 UPSA 评分明显低于对照组。UPSA 总分与 MMSE、CDR、GDS 和 IADL 评分显著相关。在检测认知障碍方面,UPSA 与 BADL(R=0.149)和 IADL(R=0.423)相比,具有更大的确定力(R=0.593),且具有更高的敏感性和特异性。
我们的结果表明,UPSA 是评估认知功能障碍患者认知功能和日常生活活动功能的有用工具。