Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Department of Psychiatry, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jan;47:101844. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.101844. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
This study aimed to obtain University of California San Diego Performance-based Skill Assessment (UPSA) cut-off scores for the purpose of severity classification and to expand the clinical utility of the UPSA for the evaluation of cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. In total, 191 patients with schizophrenia were recruited. The UPSA, Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia Scale (CGI-SCH), and Global Assessment Functioning Scale (GAF) were used for the evaluation. The cognitive symptoms item of the CGI-SCH was used as a reference and the subjects were divided into three groups: mild, moderate, and severe. The sensitivity and specificity of the UPSA were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves. There were significant differences in the UPSA, CGI-SCH, PANSS, and GAF scores among the groups. In the mild and moderate groups, a UPSA score of 59 was identified as the optimal cut-off score, and a score of 41 was identified as the optimal cut-off score in the moderate and severe groups. Severity can be classified using the UPSA score as follows: ≥ 60 for mild, 41-59 for moderate, and ≤ 40 for severe. The UPSA could be used to assess the degree of daily living dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia.
本研究旨在获得加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校基于表现的技能评估 (UPSA) 的截断分数,以便对严重程度进行分类,并扩大 UPSA 在评估精神分裂症患者认知功能方面的临床效用。共招募了 191 名精神分裂症患者。使用 UPSA、阳性和阴性症状量表 (PANSS)、临床总体印象-精神分裂症量表 (CGI-SCH) 和总体功能评估量表 (GAF) 进行评估。CGI-SCH 的认知症状项目作为参考,将受试者分为三组:轻度、中度和重度。通过受试者工作特征曲线分析 UPSA 的灵敏度和特异性。各组之间 UPSA、CGI-SCH、PANSS 和 GAF 评分存在显著差异。在轻度和中度组中,59 分被确定为最佳截断分数,在中度和重度组中,41 分被确定为最佳截断分数。可以使用 UPSA 评分将严重程度分为以下几类:≥60 分为轻度,41-59 分为中度,≤40 分为重度。UPSA 可用于评估精神分裂症患者日常生活功能障碍的程度。