Peck Karen Y, DiStefano Lindsay J, Marshall Stephen W, Padua Darin A, Beutler Anthony I, de la Motte Sarah J, Frank Barnett S, Martinez Jessica C, Cameron Kenneth L
1John A. Feagin Jr. Sports Medicine Fellowship, Keller Army Community Hospital, West Point, New York;2Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut;3Injury Prevention Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;4Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;5Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences;6Injury Prevention Research Laboratory, Consortium for Health and Military Performance, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland;7Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and8Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Nov;31(11):3146-3157. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001792.
Peck, KY, DiStefano, LJ, Marshall, SW, Padua, DA, Beutler, AI, de la Motte, SJ, Frank, BS, Martinez, JC, and Cameron, KL. Effect of a lower extremity preventive training program on physical performance scores in military recruits. J Strength Cond Res 31(11): 3146-3157, 2017-Exercise-based preventive training programs are designed to improve movement patterns associated with lower extremity injury risk; however, the impact of these programs on general physical fitness has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to compare fitness scores between participants in a preventive training program and a control group. One thousand sixty-eight freshmen from a U.S. Service Academy were cluster-randomized into either the intervention or control group during 6 weeks of summer training. The intervention group performed a preventive training program, specifically the Dynamic Integrated Movement Enhancement (DIME), which is designed to improve lower extremity movement patterns. The control group performed the Army Preparation Drill (PD), a warm-up designed to prepare soldiers for training. Main outcome measures were the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) raw and scaled (for age and sex) scores. Independent t tests were used to assess between-group differences. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to control for the influence of confounding variables. Dynamic Integrated Movement Enhancement group participants completed the APFT 2-mile run 20 seconds faster compared with the PD group (p < 0.001), which corresponded with significantly higher scaled scores (p < 0.001). Army Physical Fitness Test push-up scores were significantly higher in the DIME group (p = 0.041), but there were no significant differences in APFT sit-up scores. The DIME group had significantly higher total APFT scores compared with the PD group (p < 0.001). Similar results were observed in multivariable models after controlling for sex and body mass index (BMI). Committing time to the implementation of a preventive training program does not appear to negatively affect fitness test scores.
佩克,肯塔基州;迪斯特法诺,L.J.;马歇尔,S.W.;帕杜阿,D.A.;比特勒,A.I.;德拉莫特,S.J.;弗兰克,B.S.;马丁内斯,J.C.;卡梅隆,K.L.。下肢预防训练计划对新兵体能表现分数的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(11): 3146 - 3157,2017年——基于运动的预防训练计划旨在改善与下肢受伤风险相关的运动模式;然而,这些计划对总体身体素质的影响尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是比较预防训练计划参与者与对照组之间的体能分数。在夏季训练的6周期间,来自美国一所军事学院的1068名新生被整群随机分为干预组或对照组。干预组进行了一项预防训练计划,具体为动态综合运动强化训练(DIME),该训练旨在改善下肢运动模式。对照组进行陆军准备训练(PD),这是一种为士兵训练做准备的热身活动。主要结局指标是陆军体能测试(APFT)的原始分数和按年龄及性别调整后的分数。采用独立t检验评估组间差异。使用多变量逻辑回归模型控制混杂变量的影响。与PD组相比,动态综合运动强化训练组参与者完成APFT 2英里跑的速度快20秒(p < 0.001),这对应着显著更高的调整后分数(p < 0.001)。DIME组的陆军体能测试俯卧撑分数显著更高(p = 0.041),但APFT仰卧起坐分数无显著差异。与PD组相比,DIME组APFT总分显著更高(p < 0.001)。在控制性别和体重指数(BMI)后,多变量模型中观察到了类似结果。投入时间实施预防训练计划似乎不会对体能测试分数产生负面影响。