Physical Therapy Sciences, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Research and Development, Military Rehabilitation Center Aardenburg, Korte Molenweg 3, 3941PW, Doorn, The Netherlands.
Mil Med Res. 2019 Jul 12;6(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40779-019-0212-y.
In the military, insufficient postural stability is a risk factor for developing lower extremity injuries. Postural stability training programs are effective in preventing these injuries. However, an objective method for the measurement of postural stability in servicemen is lacking. The primary objective of this study was to assess the influence of the number of repetitions, different foot positions and real-time visual feedback on postural stability, as well as their effects on the intrasession reliability of postural stability measurements in servicemen. The secondary objective was to assess the concurrent validity of the measurements.
Twenty healthy servicemen between 20 and 50 years of age and in active duty were eligible for this quantitative, cross-sectional study. The measurements took place on a force plate, measuring the mean velocity of the center of pressure. The participants were asked to stand as still as possible in three different foot positions (wide stance, small stance, and on one leg), five times each for 45 s each time, and the measurements were performed with and without real-time visual feedback.
We observed a significant main effect of foot position (P < 0.001), but not of visual feedback (P = 0.119) or repetition number (P = 0.915). Postural stability decreased in the more challenging foot positions. The ICC estimates varied from 0.809 (one repetition in wide stance) to 0.985 (five repetitions on one leg). The common variance (R) between different foot positions without feedback varied between 0.008 (wide stance) and 0.412.
To yield reliable data, wide-stance measurements should be conducted three times, and small-stance measurements and measurements on one leg should be conducted two times. The scores of a measurement in a particular foot position cannot predict the scores of measurements in other foot positions.
在军队中,姿势稳定性不足是导致下肢受伤的一个风险因素。姿势稳定性训练计划可有效预防这些损伤。然而,缺乏一种客观的方法来测量军人的姿势稳定性。本研究的主要目的是评估重复次数、不同脚位和实时视觉反馈对姿势稳定性的影响,以及它们对军人姿势稳定性测量的日内信度的影响。次要目的是评估测量的同时效度。
这项定量、横断面研究纳入了 20 名年龄在 20 至 50 岁之间、现役的健康军人。测量是在力板上进行的,测量的是压力中心的平均速度。要求参与者尽可能在三种不同的脚位(宽站位、小站位和单腿站位)下站稳,每次 45 秒,每种脚位重复 5 次,同时进行和不进行实时视觉反馈。
我们观察到脚位的主效应显著(P<0.001),但视觉反馈(P=0.119)或重复次数(P=0.915)没有显著影响。在更具挑战性的脚位,姿势稳定性降低。ICC 估计值从 0.809(宽站位的一次重复)到 0.985(单腿的五次重复)不等。无反馈时不同脚位之间的共同方差(R)在 0.008(宽站位)和 0.412 之间。
为了获得可靠的数据,宽站位的测量应该进行三次,小站位和单腿的测量应该进行两次。特定脚位的测量分数不能预测其他脚位的测量分数。