• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三角头畸形的手术过度矫正:手术效果评估

Surgical Hypercorrection of Trigonocephaly: Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes.

作者信息

Bennett Katelyn G, Liang Fan, Ranganathan Kavitha, Muraszko Karin M, Vercler Christian J, Buchman Steven R

机构信息

Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jan;29(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004044.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004044
PMID:29068967
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A lasting correction of trigonocephaly is difficult to achieve, as a durable correction requires significant expansion to overcome galeal restriction and soft tissue recoil of the scalp. High rates of relapse have been reported throughout the literature. The specific aim of this study was to determine if the senior author's method of "hypercorrection" decreases relapse and the need for subsequent revisional surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent operative correction of metopic craniosynostosis between 1988 and 2011 were reviewed. All patients underwent the "hypercorrection" technique performed by the senior author. Hypercorrection consisted of a fronto-orbital advancement of 2.5 to 3.5 cm and a concomitant hyperexpansion of bitemporal projection. Split cranial bone grafting ensured adequate coverage of the significantly expanded cranial vault. Only patients who had at least 5 years of follow-up were included for review of outcomes. Relapse was defined as recurrence of bitemporal constriction or lateral orbital retrusion, requiring surgical correction.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients met criteria. Mean age at the time of surgery was 11 months. Mean follow-up was 9.0 years. During this time, 2 patients exhibited relapse requiring camouflage procedures. Cranial bone defects were found in 4 patients (7%), 3 of whom underwent cranial bone grafting, while 1 underwent methylmethacrylate placement at an outside institution. One patient underwent fat grafting for areas of soft tissue irregularity. No patients exhibited persistent sequelae of hypercorrection significant enough to require repeat fronto-orbital advancement.

CONCLUSION

Surgical hypercorrection of trigonocephaly seems to minimize relapse and the need for revision in long-term follow-up and is therefore an important technique to consider.

摘要

背景

三角头畸形的持久矫正很难实现,因为持久的矫正需要显著的扩张来克服帽状腱膜的限制和头皮的软组织回缩。文献报道的复发率很高。本研究的具体目的是确定资深作者的“过度矫正”方法是否能降低复发率以及后续翻修手术的必要性。

方法

回顾了1988年至2011年间接受额缝早闭手术矫正的患者。所有患者均接受了资深作者实施的“过度矫正”技术。过度矫正包括2.5至3.5厘米的额眶前移以及同时进行的双侧颞部投影的过度扩张。劈开颅骨移植确保了对显著扩张的颅顶有足够的覆盖。仅纳入至少有5年随访的患者以评估结果。复发定义为双侧颞部缩窄或眶外侧后缩复发,需要手术矫正。

结果

58例患者符合标准。手术时的平均年龄为11个月。平均随访时间为9.0年。在此期间,2例患者出现复发,需要进行掩饰手术。4例患者(7%)发现颅骨缺损,其中3例接受了颅骨移植,1例在外部机构接受了甲基丙烯酸甲酯植入。1例患者因软组织不规则区域接受了脂肪移植。没有患者出现足以需要重复额眶前移的过度矫正持续后遗症。

结论

三角头畸形的手术过度矫正似乎能在长期随访中使复发率和翻修需求降至最低,因此是一项值得考虑的重要技术。

相似文献

1
Surgical Hypercorrection of Trigonocephaly: Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes.三角头畸形的手术过度矫正:手术效果评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jan;29(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004044.
2
Reconstruction of unicoronal plagiocephaly with a hypercorrection surgical technique.采用过度矫正手术技术重建单侧冠状缝早闭性斜头畸形。
Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Aug;31(2):E4. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.FOCUS1193.
3
Fronto-Orbital Advancement for Metopic and Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostoses.额眶前移术治疗额部和单侧冠状缝早闭
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2022 Aug;34(3):367-380. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
4
Cranial vault growth patterns of plagiocephaly and trigonocephaly patients following fronto-orbital advancement: a long-term anthropometric outcome assessment.颅缝早闭症患者行额眶前移术后的颅顶生长模式:一项长期的人体测量学结果评估。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Sep;41(6):e98-e103. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.035. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
5
A critical evaluation of long-term aesthetic outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis.非综合征性单冠状缝早闭中额眶前移和颅盖重塑长期美学效果的批判性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):220-231. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000829.
6
Comparing two fronto-orbital advancement strategies to treat trigonocephaly in metopic synostosis.比较两种额眶前移策略治疗矢状缝早闭所致三角头畸形。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;42(7):1437-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
7
Variations of endoscopic and open repair of metopic craniosynostosis.额缝早闭的内镜修复与开放修复的差异。
J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Sep;20(5):1439-44. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181af1555.
8
Long-term results in nonsyndromatic unilateral coronal synostosis treated with fronto-orbital advancement.非综合征性单侧冠状缝早闭采用额眶前移术治疗的长期疗效。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;41(8):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
9
Incomplete reossification after craniosynostosis surgery-incidence and analysis of risk factors: a clinical-radiological assessment study.颅缝早闭手术后骨再化不全——发生率及危险因素分析:一项临床影像学评估研究
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Aug;22(2):120-127. doi: 10.3171/2018.2.PEDS17717. Epub 2018 May 25.
10
Anthropometric Outcomes following Fronto-Orbital Advancement for Metopic Synostosis.额缝早闭行额眶前移术后的人体测量结果
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 May;137(5):1539-1547. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002129.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning in Metopic Craniosynostosis: Does Phenotypic Severity Predict Long-Term Esthetic Outcome?机器学习在额眶缝早闭中的应用:表型严重程度是否可预测长期美观结局?
J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(1):58-64. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008868. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
On-site CAD templates reduce surgery time for complex craniostenosis repair in infants: a new method.现场计算机辅助设计模板可减少婴儿复杂颅缝早闭修复手术时间:一种新方法。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Apr;36(4):793-801. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04474-9. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
3
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.
非矢状单缝颅缝早闭不同手术类型的短期和长期预后
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Mar/Apr;30(2):458-464. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005129.