Dalian Municipal Central Hospital, Dalian, China.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct;72(9):582-587. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(09)10.
In this work, we attempted to develop a modified single-knot Kessler-loop lock suture technique and compare the biomechanical properties associated with this single-knot suture technique with those associated with the conventional modified Kessler and interlock suture techniques.
In this experiment, a total of 18 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were harvested and randomly divided into three groups. The tendons were transected and then repaired using three different techniques, including modified Kessler suture with peritendinous suture, interlock suture with peritendinous suture, and modified Kessler-loop lock suture with peritendinous suture. Times required for suturing were recorded and compared among groups. The groups were also compared with respect to 2-mm gap load, ultimate failure load, and gap at failure.
For tendon repair, compared with the conventional modified Kessler suture technique, the interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock suture techniques resulted in significantly improved biomechanical properties. However, there were no significant differences between the interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock techniques with respect to biomechanical properties, gap at failure, and time required.
The interlock and modified Kessler-loop lock techniques for flexor tendon sutures produce similar mechanical characteristics in vitro.
本研究旨在改良单结 Kessler 环锁缝线技术,并比较该单结缝线技术与改良 Kessler 缝线和锁边缝线技术相关的生物力学特性。
本实验共采集 18 只猪的屈趾深肌腱,随机分为 3 组。肌腱横断后,分别采用改良 Kessler 缝线加腱周缝线、锁边缝线加腱周缝线和改良 Kessler 环锁缝线进行修复。记录各组缝线的时间,并进行组间比较。还比较了各组 2mm 间隙负荷、最终失效负荷和失效间隙。
与传统改良 Kessler 缝线技术相比,锁边和改良 Kessler 环锁缝线技术在肌腱修复方面具有显著改善的生物力学特性。然而,在失效间隙、失效时的负荷和所需时间方面,锁边和改良 Kessler 环锁缝线技术之间没有显著差异。
在体外,屈肌腱的锁边和改良 Kessler 环锁缝线技术具有相似的力学特性。