Goldstein Daniel A, Clark Jonathon, Tu Yifan, Zhang Jie, Fang Fenqi, Goldstein Robert, Stemmer Salomon M, Rosenbaum Eli
Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikvah, Israel.
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(42):71548-71555. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17742. eCollection 2017 Sep 22.
There are major differences in cancer drug prices around the world. However, the patterns of affordability of these drugs are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to compare patterns of affordability of cancer drugs in Australia, China, India, Israel, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Cancer drug prices are highest in the United States. Cancer drugs are the least affordable in India by a large margin. Despite lower prices than in the USA, cancer drugs are less affordable in middle-income countries than in high-income countries.
We obtained the prices of a basket of cancer drugs in all 7 countries, and converted the prices to US$ using both foreign exchange rates and purchasing power parity. We assessed international differences in wealth by collecting values for gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in addition to average salaries. We compared patterns of affordability of cancer drugs by dividing the drug prices by the markers of wealth.
Cancer drugs are less affordable in middle-income countries than in high-income countries. Differential pricing may be an acceptable policy to ensure global affordability and access to highly active anti-cancer therapies.
全球癌症药物价格存在重大差异。然而,这些药物的可负担性模式却鲜为人知。本研究的目的是比较澳大利亚、中国、印度、以色列、南非、英国和美国的癌症药物可负担性模式。
美国的癌症药物价格最高。印度的癌症药物可负担性远远最低。尽管价格低于美国,但中低收入国家的癌症药物可负担性低于高收入国家。
我们获取了所有7个国家一篮子癌症药物的价格,并使用汇率和购买力平价将价格换算为美元。除平均工资外,我们还收集人均国内生产总值(GDP)值来评估国际财富差异。我们通过将药物价格除以财富指标来比较癌症药物的可负担性模式。
中低收入国家的癌症药物可负担性低于高收入国家。差别定价可能是确保全球可负担性和获得高活性抗癌疗法的一项可接受政策。