• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂方案治疗难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效分析

[Efficacy Analysis of GEMOX Regimen for Treatment of Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma].

作者信息

Yan Shi-Bin, Chen Zhong-Guang, Ma De-Liang, Lyu Xin, Wang Yan-Li, Chen Shi-Bing, Jie Gui-Tao

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Yishui Central Hospital of Linyi, Linyi 276400, Shandong Province,China.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Yishui Central Hospital of Linyi, Linyi 276400, Shandong Province,China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Oct;25(5):1415-1419. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2017.05.023.

DOI:10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2017.05.023
PMID:29070117
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical efficacy of GEMOX regimen on patients with refractory non-hodgkin's lymphoma.

METHODS

Eighty-two cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were divided into 2 groups: gemcitabine+oxaliplation(Gem+Oxa) group (42 cases) and vinorelbine+oxaliplatin(Vin+Oxa) group (40 cases) according to chemotherapy regimens. The clinical efficacy, side effects, progression-free survival situation in 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference on the clinical effects of 2 groups (P>0.05); The therapeutic efficacy for B cell lymphoma was higher than that for T cell lymphoma(P<0.05); The therapeutic effects for I-II stages was lower than that for III-IV stages(P<0.05); The incidences of platelet decline, nausea and vomit, peripheral nerve symptoms in Gem+Oxa group were lower than those in Vin+Oxa group(P<0.05); There was no significant difference in the median progression free survival(P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of GEMOX regimen for refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been confirmed to be good, it has distinct clinical curative effect, it can prolong the progression-free survival time in patients with B cell lymphoma, specially for III-IV stages. It can be used as the preferred method for the treatment of patients with refractory NHL.

摘要

目的

探讨吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂(GEMOX)方案治疗难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的临床疗效。

方法

82例非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者根据化疗方案分为两组:吉西他滨+奥沙利铂(Gem+Oxa)组42例和长春瑞滨+奥沙利铂(Vin+Oxa)组40例。比较两组的临床疗效、副作用、无进展生存情况。

结果

两组临床效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B细胞淋巴瘤的治疗效果高于T细胞淋巴瘤(P<0.05);I-II期的治疗效果低于III-IV期(P<0.05);Gem+Oxa组血小板下降、恶心呕吐、周围神经症状的发生率低于Vin+Oxa组(P<0.05);中位无进展生存期差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

GEMOX方案治疗难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效已得到证实,临床疗效显著,可延长B细胞淋巴瘤患者尤其是III-IV期患者的无进展生存时间。它可作为难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者治疗的首选方法。

相似文献

1
[Efficacy Analysis of GEMOX Regimen for Treatment of Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma].吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂方案治疗难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效分析
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Oct;25(5):1415-1419. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2017.05.023.
2
[Efficacy and safety evaluation of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin in lymphoma patients after failure of multiple chemotherapy regimens].吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂对多程化疗方案失败的淋巴瘤患者的疗效及安全性评估
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;36(2):137-40.
3
Comparison of the efficacy and impact of GEMOX and GDP in the treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂方案与吉西他滨联合顺铂方案治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效及影响比较。
J BUON. 2020 Mar-Apr;25(2):1042-1049.
4
[Efficacy of GDP regimen (gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin) on relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: a report of 24 cases].GDP方案(吉西他滨、地塞米松和顺铂)治疗复发或难治性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效:附24例报告
Ai Zheng. 2008 Nov;27(11):1222-5.
5
[Safety and efficacy evaluation of gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin for the treatment of patients with lymphoma].
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;23(2):445-9. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2015.02.029.
6
[Treatment effect of DICE regimen on patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].DICE方案对复发或难治性中高度非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的治疗效果
Ai Zheng. 2005 Apr;24(4):465-9.
7
[Clinical Efficacy Comparison between CHOPE Regimen alone and It Combined with Thalidomide for Relapsed and Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma].
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Feb;24(1):84-8. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2016.01.016.
8
MACOP-B versus ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group.MACOP-B方案与ProMACE-MOPP方案治疗晚期弥漫性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:非霍奇金淋巴瘤协作研究组前瞻性随机试验结果
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jul;12(7):1366-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.7.1366.
9
[Efficacy of DICE (dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin) regimen on recurrent and refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].DICE(地塞米松、依托泊苷、异环磷酰胺和顺铂)方案对复发难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效
Ai Zheng. 2006 Dec;25(12):1553-6.
10
[Comparing CHOP, CHOP+HD-MTX,and BFM-90 regimens in the survival rate of children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].[比较CHOP、CHOP+HD-MTX和BFM-90方案对儿童和青少年B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤生存率的影响]
Ai Zheng. 2004 Aug;23(8):933-8.