Suppr超能文献

淀粉样蛋白-PET 负荷与脑淀粉样血管病的区域分布:生物标志物性能的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Amyloid-PET burden and regional distribution in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of biomarker performance.

机构信息

Hemorrhagic Stroke Research Group, Department of Neurology, J Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;89(4):410-417. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316851. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We performed a meta-analysis to synthesise current evidence on amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET) burden and presumed preferential occipital distribution in sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA).

METHODS

In a PubMed systematic search, we identified case-control studies with extractable data on global and occipital-to-global amyloid-PET uptake in symptomatic patients with CAA (per Boston criteria) versus control groups (healthy participants or patients with non-CAA deep intracerebral haemorrhage) and patients with Alzheimer's disease. To circumvent PET studies' methodological variation, we generated and used 'fold change', that is, ratio of mean amyloid uptake (global and occipital-to-global) of CAA relative to comparison groups. Amyloid-PET uptake biomarker performance was then quantified by random-effects meta-analysis on the ratios of the means. A ratio >1 indicates that amyloid-PET uptake (global or occipital/global) is higher in CAA than comparison groups, and a ratio <1 indicates the reverse.

RESULTS

Seven studies, including 106 patients with CAA (>90% with probable CAA) and 138 controls (96 healthy elderly, 42 deep intracerebral haemorrhage controls) and 72 patients with Alzheimer's disease, were included. Global amyloid-PET ratio between patients with CAA and controls was above 1, with an average effect size of 1.18 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.28; p<0.0001). Occipital-to-global amyloid-PET uptake ratio did not differ between patients with CAA versus patients with deep intracerebral haemorrhage or healthy controls. By contrast, occipital-to-global amyloid-PET uptake ratio was above 1 in patients with CAA versus those with Alzheimer's disease, with an average ratio of 1.10 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.19; p=0.009) and high statistical heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis provides exploratory actionable data on the overall effect sizes and strength of amyloid-PET burden and distribution in patients with CAA, useful for future larger studies.

摘要

简介

我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以综合目前关于淀粉样蛋白正电子发射断层扫描(PET)负荷和散发性脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)中假定的优先枕叶分布的证据。

方法

在 PubMed 系统检索中,我们确定了病例对照研究,这些研究具有可提取的关于符合波士顿标准的 CAA 症状患者(相对于对照组(健康参与者或非 CAA 深部脑出血患者)和阿尔茨海默病患者)的全球和枕叶-全球淀粉样蛋白-PET 摄取的数据。为了规避 PET 研究的方法学差异,我们生成并使用了“倍数变化”,即 CAA 相对于比较组的平均淀粉样蛋白摄取(全局和枕叶-全局)的比率。然后,通过对平均值的比率进行随机效应荟萃分析来量化淀粉样蛋白-PET 摄取生物标志物的性能。比值>1 表示淀粉样蛋白-PET 摄取(全局或枕叶/全局)在 CAA 中高于比较组,比值<1 表示相反。

结果

纳入了 7 项研究,包括 106 例 CAA 患者(>90%为可能的 CAA)和 138 例对照(96 例健康老年人,42 例深部脑出血对照)和 72 例阿尔茨海默病患者。CAA 患者与对照组之间的全局淀粉样蛋白-PET 比值大于 1,平均效应大小为 1.18(95%CI 1.08 至 1.28;p<0.0001)。CAA 患者与深部脑出血患者或健康对照组之间的枕叶-全局淀粉样蛋白-PET 摄取比值没有差异。相比之下,CAA 患者与阿尔茨海默病患者相比,枕叶-全局淀粉样蛋白-PET 摄取比值大于 1,平均比值为 1.10(95%CI 1.03 至 1.19;p=0.009)且存在高度统计学异质性。

结论

我们的分析提供了关于 CAA 患者淀粉样蛋白-PET 负荷和分布整体效应大小和强度的探索性可操作数据,对未来更大的研究有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验