Suppr超能文献

改良纸片碳青霉烯酶试验快速检测肠杆菌科碳青霉烯酶的产生。

Rapid Detection of Carbapenemase Production in Enterobacteriaceae by Use of a Modified Paper Strip Carba NP Method.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Carol Yu Centre for Infection, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

Department of Microbiology and Carol Yu Centre for Infection, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec 26;56(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01110-17. Print 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Rapid and accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing (CPE) is important for preventing their spread in health care settings. We compared the performance of the Carba NP (CNP) test using the CLSI tube method with that using a modified paper strip method for the detection of carbapenemases in 390 isolates. The isolates were identified by Hong Kong's carbapenem-resistant surveillance program in 2016 and comprised 213 CPE and 177 carbapenemase-negative isolates. Molecular genotype was used as the reference. The test results were read at different time points for the CLSI method (1 min, 5 min, 1 h, and 2 h) and strip method (1 min and 5 min). The strip CNP and CLSI CNP tests correctly detect carbapenemase production in 93% and 93% of KPC producers, 100% and 38% of IMI producers, 94% and 85% of IMP producers, 98% and 90% of NDM producers, and 29% and 12% of OXA producers, respectively. Overall, the strip method has superior sensitivity to the CLSI method (86% versus 75%, respectively; < 0.001, McNemar test). The specificity of both methods was 100%. By the CLSI method, 27%, 14%, 29%, and 6% of the CPE isolates were positive at 1 min, 5 min, 1 h, and 2 h, respectively. In contrast, by the strip method, 76% of the CPE isolates were positive at 1 min, and an additional 10% were positive at 5 min. In conclusion, the Carba NP test by use of the modified strip method has a higher sensitivity and a shorter assay time than that those by use of the CLSI tube method.

摘要

快速准确地检测产碳青霉烯酶(CPE)对于防止其在医疗机构中传播非常重要。我们比较了使用 CLSI 管法和改良纸条法检测 2016 年香港耐碳青霉烯类监测计划中 390 株分离株中产碳青霉烯酶的 Carba NP(CNP)试验的性能。这些分离株的分子基因型被用作参考。使用 CLSI 方法(1 分钟、5 分钟、1 小时和 2 小时)和纸条方法(1 分钟和 5 分钟)读取不同时间点的测试结果。纸条 CNP 和 CLSI CNP 试验分别正确检测出 93%和 93%的 KPC 产生菌、100%和 38%的 IMI 产生菌、94%和 85%的 IMP 产生菌、98%和 90%的 NDM 产生菌、29%和 12%的 OXA 产生菌的碳青霉烯酶产生情况。总的来说,纸条法的灵敏度优于 CLSI 法(分别为 86%和 75%;<0.001,McNemar 检验)。两种方法的特异性均为 100%。按照 CLSI 法,27%、14%、29%和 6%的 CPE 分离株在 1 分钟、5 分钟、1 小时和 2 小时时分别为阳性。相比之下,按照纸条法,76%的 CPE 分离株在 1 分钟时呈阳性,另外 10%的分离株在 5 分钟时呈阳性。总之,与 CLSI 管法相比,改良纸条法的 Carba NP 试验具有更高的灵敏度和更短的检测时间。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in genotypic antimicrobialresistance testing: a comprehensive review.基因型抗菌药物耐药性检测的进展:全面综述
Sci China Life Sci. 2025 Jan;68(1):130-143. doi: 10.1007/s11427-023-2570-4. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
5
The Global Ascendency of OXA-48-Type Carbapenemases.OXA-48 型碳青霉烯酶的全球优势地位
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Nov 13;33(1). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00102-19. Print 2019 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

7
Evaluation of the Carba NP Test in Oregon, 2013.2013年俄勒冈州碳青霉烯酶检测(Carba NP Test)评估
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Dec 27;61(1). doi: 10.1128/AAC.03005-15. Print 2017 Jan.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验