Department of Microbiology and Carol Yu Centre for Infection, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
Department of Microbiology and Carol Yu Centre for Infection, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Dec 26;56(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01110-17. Print 2018 Jan.
Rapid and accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing (CPE) is important for preventing their spread in health care settings. We compared the performance of the Carba NP (CNP) test using the CLSI tube method with that using a modified paper strip method for the detection of carbapenemases in 390 isolates. The isolates were identified by Hong Kong's carbapenem-resistant surveillance program in 2016 and comprised 213 CPE and 177 carbapenemase-negative isolates. Molecular genotype was used as the reference. The test results were read at different time points for the CLSI method (1 min, 5 min, 1 h, and 2 h) and strip method (1 min and 5 min). The strip CNP and CLSI CNP tests correctly detect carbapenemase production in 93% and 93% of KPC producers, 100% and 38% of IMI producers, 94% and 85% of IMP producers, 98% and 90% of NDM producers, and 29% and 12% of OXA producers, respectively. Overall, the strip method has superior sensitivity to the CLSI method (86% versus 75%, respectively; < 0.001, McNemar test). The specificity of both methods was 100%. By the CLSI method, 27%, 14%, 29%, and 6% of the CPE isolates were positive at 1 min, 5 min, 1 h, and 2 h, respectively. In contrast, by the strip method, 76% of the CPE isolates were positive at 1 min, and an additional 10% were positive at 5 min. In conclusion, the Carba NP test by use of the modified strip method has a higher sensitivity and a shorter assay time than that those by use of the CLSI tube method.
快速准确地检测产碳青霉烯酶(CPE)对于防止其在医疗机构中传播非常重要。我们比较了使用 CLSI 管法和改良纸条法检测 2016 年香港耐碳青霉烯类监测计划中 390 株分离株中产碳青霉烯酶的 Carba NP(CNP)试验的性能。这些分离株的分子基因型被用作参考。使用 CLSI 方法(1 分钟、5 分钟、1 小时和 2 小时)和纸条方法(1 分钟和 5 分钟)读取不同时间点的测试结果。纸条 CNP 和 CLSI CNP 试验分别正确检测出 93%和 93%的 KPC 产生菌、100%和 38%的 IMI 产生菌、94%和 85%的 IMP 产生菌、98%和 90%的 NDM 产生菌、29%和 12%的 OXA 产生菌的碳青霉烯酶产生情况。总的来说,纸条法的灵敏度优于 CLSI 法(分别为 86%和 75%;<0.001,McNemar 检验)。两种方法的特异性均为 100%。按照 CLSI 法,27%、14%、29%和 6%的 CPE 分离株在 1 分钟、5 分钟、1 小时和 2 小时时分别为阳性。相比之下,按照纸条法,76%的 CPE 分离株在 1 分钟时呈阳性,另外 10%的分离株在 5 分钟时呈阳性。总之,与 CLSI 管法相比,改良纸条法的 Carba NP 试验具有更高的灵敏度和更短的检测时间。