Chavada Ruchir, Walker Harry N, Tong Deborah, Murray Amy
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Pathology North Central Coast.
Division of Medicine, Central Coast Local Health District.
Infect Dis Rep. 2017 Oct 2;9(3):7268. doi: 10.4081/idr.2017.7268.
The introduction of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program is associated with a change in antimicrobial prescribing behavior. A proposed mechanism for this change is by impacting the described in qualitative studies. This study sought to detect a change in prescribing attitudes 12 months after the introduction of AMS and gauge utility of various AMS interventions. Surveys were distributed to doctors in two regional Australian hospitals on a convenience basis 6 months before, and 12 months after, the introduction of AMS. Agreement with 20 statements describing attitudes (cultural, behavioral and knowledge) towards antimicrobial prescribing was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale. Mean response scores were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank sum test. 155 responses were collected before the introduction of AMS, and 144 afterwards. After the introduction of AMS, an increase was observed in knowledge about available resources such as electronic decision support systems (EDSS) and therapeutic guidelines, with raised awareness about the support available through AMS rounds and the process to be followed when prescribing restricted antimicrobials. Additionally, doctors were less likely to rely on pharmacy to ascertain when an antimicrobial was restricted, depend on infectious diseases consultant advice and use past experience to guide antimicrobial prescribing. Responses to this survey indicate that positive changes to the antimicrobial prescribing etiquette may be achieved with the introduction of an AMS program. Use of EDSS and other resources such as evidence-based guidelines are perceived to be important to drive rational antimicrobial prescribing within AMS programs.
抗菌药物管理(AMS)计划的引入与抗菌药物处方行为的改变相关。这种改变的一种推测机制是通过影响定性研究中所描述的内容。本研究旨在检测AMS引入12个月后处方态度的变化,并评估各种AMS干预措施的效用。在澳大利亚两家地区医院,于AMS引入前6个月和引入后12个月,以方便抽样的方式向医生发放调查问卷。采用4点李克特量表评估对20条描述对抗菌药物处方态度(文化、行为和知识方面)的陈述的认同度。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较平均反应得分。在AMS引入前收集到155份回复,之后收集到144份回复。引入AMS后,观察到医生对电子决策支持系统(EDSS)和治疗指南等可用资源的知识有所增加,对通过AMS查房可获得的支持以及开具限制使用抗菌药物时应遵循的流程的认识有所提高。此外,医生不太可能依赖药房来确定抗菌药物何时受到限制,不太依赖传染病顾问的建议,也不太会根据过去的经验来指导抗菌药物处方。本次调查的回复表明,引入AMS计划可能会实现抗菌药物处方规范的积极变化。在AMS计划中,使用EDSS和其他资源(如循证指南)被认为对推动合理的抗菌药物处方很重要。