Jacobs Cornelius, Hartwig Tony, Rößler Philip P, Meila Dan, Nikiforov Igor, Plöger Milena M, Burger Christof, Scheidt Sebastian
Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund Freud Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Department für Bewegungschirurgie, Vivantes Klinikum Spandau, Neue Bergstraße 6, 13585, Berlin, Deutschland.
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Sep;121(9):739-746. doi: 10.1007/s00113-017-0424-0.
Vertebral body fractures (VBF) can be caused by various trauma mechanisms. The AOSpine classification system differentiates three main types of fractures according to the grade of instability. How the increasing energy of various accident mechanisms changes the complexity of the individual fracture, its localization and the occurrence of further fractures has not yet been finally investigated.
What influence do traumatic events with different kinematics have on the localization, complexity and number of VBF in the thoracic and lumbar spine?
In this retrospective study data from patients with a freshly traumatized VBF were analyzed. The patients were divided into six trauma groups (UFG) depending on the trauma mechanism. The VBF were classified on the basis of computed tomography (CT) imaging according to the AOSpine classification system. Testing was performed bilaterally and a significance level of 5% was used. The statistical calculations were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics.
A significant increase in the severity of fractures (AO classification) was found in the high energy trauma groups (UFG III and V). In addition, the incidence of thoracic (TH) VBF was significantly increased for TH7 (p = 0.011) and TH10 (p = 0.001). In comparison to the other low energy trauma groups, the risk of a TH7 fracture was 7‑times higher after a high energy trauma (odds ratio OR = 7.0; 95% confidence interval CI = 1.4; 35.2). The UFG III (falls > 3 m) showed the highest number of fractures with a median of 2.5 (SD 1.84) VBF.
An exact reproduction of the traumatic event enables a distinction between high and low energy trauma groups to be made. In previous studies traffic accidents were recorded as one group, so an influence of the increasing kinematic energy could not be assessed. The accident kinematics can be taken into account by differentiating between high and low-energy trauma groups. In high-energy accidents the TH7 and TH10 vertebrae were found to be at risk vertebrae. In addition to the force direction, the force strength also has a decisive influence on the distribution pattern of VBF.
椎体骨折(VBF)可由多种创伤机制引起。AOSpine分类系统根据不稳定程度区分三种主要骨折类型。各种事故机制能量的增加如何改变个体骨折的复杂性、其定位以及进一步骨折的发生情况尚未得到最终研究。
不同运动学的创伤事件对胸腰椎VBF的定位、复杂性和数量有何影响?
在这项回顾性研究中,分析了新发创伤性VBF患者的数据。根据创伤机制将患者分为六个创伤组(UFG)。根据AOSpine分类系统,基于计算机断层扫描(CT)成像对VBF进行分类。双侧进行测试,显著性水平为5%。使用IBM SPSS Statistics进行统计计算。
在高能量创伤组(UFG III和V)中发现骨折严重程度(AO分类)显著增加。此外,胸段(TH)VBF在TH7(p = 0.011)和TH10(p = 0.001)的发生率显著增加。与其他低能量创伤组相比,高能量创伤后TH7骨折的风险高7倍(优势比OR = 7.0;95%置信区间CI = 1.4;35.