Suppr超能文献

[与 之间针刺补泻理论的差异] (你提供的原文中存在部分信息缺失,已按现有内容准确翻译)

[Differences on Acupuncture Reinforcing and Reducing Theory Between and ].

作者信息

Li Su-Yun

机构信息

Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.

出版信息

Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2017 Feb 25;42(1):79-84.

Abstract

Reinforcing and reducing manipulation is the elite of traditional acupuncture needling methods. Abundant records could be found in () and () at early times. In the present paper, the author collates and compares the recordation of reinforcing and reducing acupuncture manipulation in these two classics on the basis of the principle and connotation of the two manipulations and from three key factors as stimulus location,manipulation technique and needling time. Based on objective analysis of the original text,distinct differences were found in above three aspects. Therefore, the conclusion is that and resemble different medical school of thoughts at an early phase of acupuncture theories.

摘要

补泻手法是传统针刺手法中的精华。早期在()和()中有丰富记载。本文作者基于补泻两种手法的原理和内涵,从刺激部位、操作技术和针刺时间三个关键因素出发,对这两部经典中补泻针刺手法的记载进行整理和比较。通过对原文的客观分析,发现上述三个方面存在明显差异。因此,得出的结论是,()和()在针刺理论早期类似于不同的医学思想流派。

相似文献

3
[On the depth of needle insertion].
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2015 Sep;35(9):913-6.
7
[Acupuncture theory in and launching the natural history of body].
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2024 May 12;44(5):593-8. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240115-0001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验