Suppr超能文献

希腊教师对注意力缺陷多动障碍的了解。

Greek teachers' knowledge about attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

作者信息

Giannopoulou I, Korkoliakou P, Pasalari E, Douzenis A

机构信息

2nd Department of Psychiatry, Athens University Medical School, "Attikon" University Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Psychiatriki. 2017 Jul-Sep;28(3):226-233. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2017.283.226.

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurobiological disorder, which affects about 5.2% of school-aged children worldwide. Children with ADHD present teachers with a special challenge, since they interfere with teaching process and do not respond to typical classroom management techniques. In order to meet this challenge teachers must have accurate, up-to-date, information about the disorder so that they can respond to the needs of the student with ADHD. Studies that have examined teachers' beliefs and knowledge relating to ADHD highlighted the need for providing training to increase Greek teachers' knowledge and understanding of the disorder. Thus, the aims of the present study were: (a) to develop and evaluate brief ADHD training seminar for teachers; and (b) to investigate whether the training format (half-day versus two-day seminar) would have a differential effect on teachers' knowledge about ADHD. A total of 143 teachers formed the two sample groups; Group 1 (n=68) attended a half-day training (5 hours), and Group 2 (n=75) a two-day training (18 hours). Seminar topics included: (a) gaining basic knowledge about the symptoms, causes and natural history of ADHD, (b) understanding the key underlying cognitive deficits of the disorder and their impact on learning and behavior, (c) implementation of specific learning strategies for children with ADHD, (d) benefits and limitations of existing treatment approaches including the pharmacological treatment, and (e) available instruments for teachers that could inform their decision to refer the student to CAMHS for an assessment. A self-report ADHD Knowledge Questionnaire (ADHD-KQ), which covers four domains (clinical presentation, causes, cognitive deficits, interventions) was developed for the purpose of the present study, and was administered pre- and post-seminar. Teachers were generally knowledgeable about clinical presentation of ADHD, with more than 80% of the sample responding correctly to items pertaining to core symptoms. The internal consistency of the total ADHD-KQ scale measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be good (0.89). The alpha coefficients for the sub-scales were acceptable (0.70 for the Symptoms/Diagnosis sub-scale, 0.73 for the Cognitive Deficits sub-scale, and 0.75 for the Intervention sub-scale), except for the Causes sub-scale, which was poor (0.59). In addition, each of the sub-scales showed a significant correlation with the total scales score (range r=0.66 to r=0.79), and there also was significant correlation between the four sub-scales (range r=0.39 to r=0.45). As expected, gaps in knowledge were identified, particularly in the area of causes, pharmacological treatment and cognitive deficits associated with ADHD. The results, using paired samples t tests, showed a highly significant increase in ADHD-KQ total and all sub-scale scores in both groups (p<0.001), indicating an overall improved knowledge about ADHD irrespective of the training format, i.e. half-day versus two-day training seminar. One-way MANOVA revealed significant difference between the two training seminars in mean pre-post difference sub-scale scores considered simultaneously. Subsequent univariate tests of between-subjects effects revealed that the group (training format) had a statistically significant effect on ADHD knowledge of symptoms sub-scale only [F(1,141)=10.46, p<0.01], with those who participated in the two-day training seminar having significantly higher mean pre-post difference scores as compared to teachers who attended the half-day training seminar (p<0.01). The present findings merit replication and, if confirmed in larger samples, have important implications for undergraduate curriculum development and training of practicing teachers, so that to overcome specific knowledge gaps and misconceptions with regards to ADHD. Future study should incorporate the use of classroom interventions and teaching strategies for students with ADHD, before and after brief training seminar, for a more thorough evaluation of its effectiveness.

摘要

注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种神经生物学紊乱疾病,全球约5.2%的学龄儿童受其影响。患有ADHD的儿童给教师带来了特殊挑战,因为他们干扰教学过程,且对典型的课堂管理技巧没有反应。为应对这一挑战,教师必须掌握有关该疾病准确、最新的信息,以便满足患有ADHD学生的需求。研究调查了教师对ADHD的看法和知识,强调需要提供培训以增加希腊教师对该疾病的了解。因此,本研究的目的是:(a)为教师开发并评估简短的ADHD培训研讨会;(b)调查培训形式(半天研讨会与两天研讨会)是否会对教师关于ADHD的知识产生不同影响。共有143名教师组成了两个样本组;第1组(n = 68)参加了为期半天的培训(5小时),第2组(n = 75)参加了为期两天的培训(18小时)。研讨会主题包括:(a)了解ADHD的症状、病因和自然病程的基本知识;(b)理解该疾病潜在的关键认知缺陷及其对学习和行为的影响;(c)为患有ADHD的儿童实施特定的学习策略;(d)现有治疗方法(包括药物治疗)的益处和局限性;(e)可供教师使用的工具,以便他们决定将学生转介到儿童与青少年心理健康服务机构(CAMHS)进行评估。为了本研究的目的,开发了一份涵盖四个领域(临床表现、病因、认知缺陷、干预措施)的自我报告ADHD知识问卷(ADHD-KQ),并在研讨会前后进行了施测。教师们通常对ADHD的临床表现有所了解,超过80%的样本对与核心症状相关的项目回答正确。通过克朗巴赫α系数测量的ADHD-KQ总量表的内部一致性良好(0.89)。各子量表的α系数是可接受的(症状/诊断子量表为0.70,认知缺陷子量表为0.73,干预子量表为0.75),但病因子量表较差(0.59)。此外,每个子量表与总量表得分均呈显著相关(相关系数范围r = 0.66至r = 0.79),四个子量表之间也存在显著相关(相关系数范围r = 0.39至r = 0.45)。正如预期的那样,发现了知识差距,特别是在病因、药物治疗以及与ADHD相关的认知缺陷方面。使用配对样本t检验的结果显示,两组的ADHD-KQ总分及所有子量表得分均有极显著提高(p < 0.001),这表明无论培训形式是半天还是两天的培训研讨会,教师对ADHD的总体了解都有所改善。单因素多元方差分析显示,在同时考虑前后差异子量表得分时,两个培训研讨会之间存在显著差异。随后的组间效应单变量检验表明,培训形式组仅对症状子量表的ADHD知识有统计学显著影响[F(1,141)=10.46,p < 0.01],与参加半天培训研讨会的教师相比,参加两天培训研讨会的教师前后差异得分的均值显著更高(p < 0.01)。本研究结果值得重复验证,如果在更大样本中得到证实,将对本科课程开发和在职教师培训具有重要意义,从而克服关于ADHD的特定知识差距和误解。未来的研究应纳入在简短培训研讨会前后对患有ADHD学生的课堂干预和教学策略的使用情况,以便更全面地评估其有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验