当受阴极射线管成本限制时——做个左派！（此译文可能因原文语境不明，翻译稍显怪异，你可补充更多背景信息以便我更准确翻译） - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

When limited by cost in CRT-be a leftist!

作者信息

Vyas Aniruddha, Lokhandwala Yash

机构信息

Medanta Hospital, Indore, India.

Arrhythmia Associates, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 May-Jun;17(3):70-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ipej.2017.05.003

PMID:29072999

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5478912/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de5e/5478912/32e53f3e5a48/gr1.jpg

相似文献

When limited by cost in CRT-be a leftist!当受阴极射线管成本限制时——做个左派！（此译文可能因原文语境不明，翻译稍显怪异，你可补充更多背景信息以便我更准确翻译）

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 May-Jun;17(3):70-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 5.

Is cardiac resynchronization therapy cost-effective?心脏再同步治疗是否具有成本效益？

Europace. 2009 Nov;11 Suppl 5:v93-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup274.

Psychiatry, authoritarianism, and revolution: the politics of mental illness during military dictatorships in Argentina, 1966-1983.精神病学、威权主义与革命：1966年至1983年阿根廷军事独裁统治时期的精神疾病政治

Bull Hist Med. 2013 Summer;87(2):250-78. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2013.0029.

Cost benefit of emerging technology in localized carcinoma of the prostate.新兴技术在前列腺局限性癌中的成本效益

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Nov 1;39(4):875-83. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00453-7.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a cost or an investment?心脏再同步治疗：成本还是投资？

Europace. 2011 May;13 Suppl 2:ii32-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur079.

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗（双心室起搏）用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益：系统评价与经济学模型

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.

Cost effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial.心脏再同步治疗在心力衰竭的药物治疗、起搏和除颤比较（COMPANION）试验中的成本效益。

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2311-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.033.

The long-term cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器辅助或不辅助的心脏再同步治疗的长期成本效益

Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan;28(1):42-51. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl382. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

Economic Value and Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Patients With Mild Heart Failure: Projections From the REVERSE Long-Term Follow-Up.轻度心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗的经济价值和成本效益：REVERSE 长期随访预测结果。

JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;5(3):204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.10.014. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Chemoradiation Therapy Versus Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Associated, Clinical N2 Oropharyngeal Cancer.人乳头瘤病毒相关的临床 N2 口咽癌放化疗与经口机器人手术的成本效果分析。

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 1;94(3):512-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

'Optimized' LV only pacing using a dual chamber pacemaker as a cost effective alternative to CRT.使用双腔起搏器进行“优化”的仅左心室起搏，作为心脏再同步治疗（CRT）的一种经济有效的替代方案。

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 May-Jun;17(3):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 6.

Comparison of hemodynamic effects of biventricular versus left ventricular only pacing in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: A before-after clinical trial.心脏再同步治疗患者中双心室起搏与单纯左心室起搏血流动力学效应的比较：一项前后对照临床试验。

J Arrhythm. 2017 Apr;33(2):127-129. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

20 years of cardiac resynchronization therapy.20 年心脏再同步治疗。

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 9;64(10):1047-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1178.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating left ventricular vs. biventricular pacing in heart failure: effect on all-cause mortality and hospitalizations.随机对照试验的荟萃分析评估心力衰竭患者左心室与双心室起搏的效果：全因死亡率和住院率的影响。

Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Jun;14(6):652-60. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs040. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

Left ventricular versus biventricular for cardiac resynchronization therapy: comparable but not equal.

Circulation. 2011 Dec 20;124(25):2803-4. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.070763.

Left ventricular versus simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and a QRS complex ≥120 milliseconds.左心室与同时双心室起搏治疗心力衰竭伴 QRS 波群≥120 毫秒患者的比较。

Circulation. 2011 Dec 20;124(25):2874-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032904. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Reduced ventricular volumes and improved systolic function with cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized trial comparing simultaneous biventricular pacing, sequential biventricular pacing, and left ventricular pacing.心脏再同步治疗可降低心室容积并改善收缩功能：一项比较同步双心室起搏、序贯双心室起搏和左心室起搏的随机试验。

Circulation. 2007 Apr 24;115(16):2136-44. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.634444. Epub 2007 Apr 9.

Biventricular vs. left univentricular pacing in heart failure: rationale, design, and endpoints of the B-LEFT HF study.心力衰竭中双心室起搏与左单心室起搏：B-LEFT HF研究的原理、设计与终点

Europace. 2006 Jan;8(1):76-80. doi: 10.1093/europace/euj020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验