• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用双腔起搏器进行“优化”的仅左心室起搏,作为心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的一种经济有效的替代方案。

'Optimized' LV only pacing using a dual chamber pacemaker as a cost effective alternative to CRT.

作者信息

Rai Maneesh K, Prabhu Mukund A, Sharma Abhishek, Vekariya Ritesh, Kamath Padmanabh, Pai Narasimha, Kamath Ramanath L

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Department of Cardiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 May-Jun;17(3):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ipej.2017.05.001
PMID:29073000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5478914/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac Resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains largely under-used in developing countries owing to the high cost of therapy. In this pilot study, we explore 'optimized' Left Ventricle Only Pacing (LVOP) as a cost effective alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy in selected patients with heart failure.

HYPOTHESIS

In economically poorer patients with heart failure, left bundle branch block (LBBB) and intact AV node conduction, synchronization can be obtained using a dual chamber pacemaker (leads in right atrium and Left ventricle) with the help of 2D strain imaging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

4 patients underwent LVOP for symptomatic heart failure. Post procedure 'optimization' was done using 12 lead electrocardiography and 2D- Strain imaging. Difference between Time to Peak longitudinal strain and Aortic valve Closure (Diff T) was calculated for each segment at different AV delays and the AV delay with the smallest Diff T was programmed. The mean AV delay that resulted in electrical and mechanical synchrony was 150 ms. After a mean follow up of 6 months, all patients had improved by at least 1 NYHA class. The mean reduction in QRS duration post procedure was -54.5 ± 22.82 ms and the mean improvement in EF was 7 ± 2.75%.

CONCLUSION

Optimized LVOP using 2D strain and ECG can be a cost-effective alternative to CRT in patients with LBBB, heart failure and normal AV node conduction.

摘要

背景

由于治疗费用高昂,心脏再同步治疗(CRT)在发展中国家的应用仍非常有限。在这项初步研究中,我们探索“优化”的单纯左心室起搏(LVOP)作为某些心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗的一种经济有效的替代方法。

假设

在经济条件较差、患有心力衰竭、存在左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)且房室结传导正常的患者中,借助二维应变成像,使用双腔起搏器(导线置于右心房和左心室)可实现同步。

方法与结果

4例有症状心力衰竭患者接受了LVOP治疗。术后使用12导联心电图和二维应变成像进行“优化”。计算不同房室延迟时各节段达到纵向应变峰值的时间与主动脉瓣关闭时间之差(Diff T),并设定Diff T最小的房室延迟。实现电和机械同步的平均房室延迟为150毫秒。平均随访6个月后,所有患者的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级至少改善1级。术后QRS时限平均缩短-54.5±22.82毫秒,射血分数(EF)平均改善7±2.75%。

结论

对于患有LBBB、心力衰竭且房室结传导正常的患者,使用二维应变和心电图进行优化的LVOP可作为CRT的一种经济有效的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b8/5478914/75c228c52cbc/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b8/5478914/718bd8643c5d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b8/5478914/d6899b91adc0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b8/5478914/7a45f01536b0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b8/5478914/75c228c52cbc/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b8/5478914/718bd8643c5d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b8/5478914/d6899b91adc0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b8/5478914/7a45f01536b0/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b8/5478914/75c228c52cbc/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
'Optimized' LV only pacing using a dual chamber pacemaker as a cost effective alternative to CRT.使用双腔起搏器进行“优化”的仅左心室起搏,作为心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的一种经济有效的替代方案。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 May-Jun;17(3):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 6.
2
Acute biventricular hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block.心脏再同步治疗对右束支传导阻滞患者双心室血液动力学的急性影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Oct;15(10):1525-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 23.
3
Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗中机械性不同步的评估。
Dan Med J. 2014 Dec;61(12):B4981.
4
Left ventricular electrical activation during right ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with LBBB: visualization by electrocardiographic imaging and implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy.左束支传导阻滞心力衰竭患者右心室起搏时的左心室电激活:通过心电图成像可视化及对心脏再同步治疗的意义
J Electrocardiol. 2015 Jan-Feb;48(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
5
Electrical and mechanical components of dyssynchrony in heart failure patients with normal QRS duration and left bundle-branch block: impact of left and biventricular pacing.QRS时限正常及左束支传导阻滞的心力衰竭患者电与机械不同步的组成部分:左心室和双心室起搏的影响
Circulation. 2004 Jun 1;109(21):2544-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131184.40893.40. Epub 2004 May 17.
6
Adaptive CRT in patients with normal AV conduction and left bundle branch block: Does QRS duration matter?正常房室传导和左束支传导阻滞患者的适应性心脏再同步治疗:QRS波时限重要吗?
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;240:297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
Whether noninvasive optimization of AV and VV delays improves the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.是否可以通过非侵入性优化 AV 和 VV 延迟来改善心脏再同步治疗的反应。
Cardiol J. 2013;20(4):411-7. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0100.
8
Calculation of effective VV interval facilitates optimization of AV delay and VV interval in cardiac resynchronization therapy.有效心室-心室间期的计算有助于优化心脏再同步治疗中的房室延迟和心室-心室间期。
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Jan;4(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Sep 9.
9
His-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Maximize Electrical Resynchronization: A Feasibility Study.心脏再同步优化治疗以最大化电学再同步:一项可行性研究。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;12(2):e006934. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006934.
10
Atrioventricular delay programming and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in MADIT-CRT.房室延迟程控和心脏再同步治疗在 MADIT-CRT 中的获益。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Aug;10(8):1136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Republic of Moldova: The beginning of the journey.摩尔多瓦共和国的心脏再同步治疗:征程的起点。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Dec 16;3(6Part B):728-730. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.09.019. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Comparison of left ventricular and biventricular pacing: Rationale and clinical implications.左心室起搏与双心室起搏的比较:理论基础及临床意义
Anatol J Cardiol. 2019 Sep;22(3):132-139. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.35006.
3
When limited by cost in CRT-be a leftist!当受阴极射线管成本限制时——做个左派! (此译文可能因原文语境不明,翻译稍显怪异,你可补充更多背景信息以便我更准确翻译)

本文引用的文献

1
2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).2013年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心脏起搏与心脏再同步治疗特别工作组。与欧洲心律协会(EHRA)合作制定。
Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1070-118. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut206. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
2
ACCF/HRS/AHA/ASE/HFSA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2013 appropriate use criteria for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, Heart Rhythm Society, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Failure Society of America, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.ACCF/HRS/AHA/ASE/HFSA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2013年植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗的合理使用标准:美国心脏病学基金会合理使用标准工作组、心律协会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国心力衰竭学会、心血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会以及心血管磁共振学会的报告
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 May-Jun;17(3):70-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 5.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 26;61(12):1318-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
3
2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2012年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心律学会对2008年心脏节律异常器械治疗指南的重点更新:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 2;60(14):1297-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
4
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating left ventricular vs. biventricular pacing in heart failure: effect on all-cause mortality and hospitalizations.随机对照试验的荟萃分析评估心力衰竭患者左心室与双心室起搏的效果:全因死亡率和住院率的影响。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Jun;14(6):652-60. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs040. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
5
Assessment of systolic dyssynchrony for cardiac resynchronization therapy is clinically useful.评估心脏再同步治疗的收缩不同步在临床上是有用的。
Circulation. 2011 Feb 15;123(6):640-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.954404.
6
A randomized double-blind comparison of biventricular versus left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Biventricular versus Left Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients (B-LEFT HF) trial.一项心脏再同步治疗中双心室与左心室刺激的随机双盲对比研究:心力衰竭患者中带有 ICD 备用功能的双心室与左心室单腔起搏(B-LEFT HF)试验。
Am Heart J. 2010 Jun;159(6):1052-1058.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.03.008.
7
RV electrical activation in heart failure during right, left, and biventricular pacing.心力衰竭时右、左和双心室起搏的 RV 电激活。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jun;3(6):567-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.12.017.
8
Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction.射血分数正常的心动过缓患者的双心室起搏
N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 26;361(22):2123-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907555. Epub 2009 Nov 15.
9
Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy.通过斑点追踪应变成像评估左心室不同步:心脏再同步治疗中纵向、圆周和径向应变的比较
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 May 20;51(20):1944-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.040.
10
Avoidance of right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy improves right ventricular hemodynamics in heart failure patients.在心脏再同步治疗中避免右心室起搏可改善心力衰竭患者的右心室血流动力学。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 May;18(5):497-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00788.x. Epub 2007 Apr 11.