Liu Hsiang-Wen, Chen Yunn-Jy, Lai Yi-Chun, Huang Ching-Yi, Huang Ya-Ling, Lin Ming-Tzer, Han Sung-Ying, Chen Chi-Ling, Yu Chong-Jen, Lee Pei-Lin
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, Yun-Lin, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0187032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187032. eCollection 2017.
This study aimed to determine the effect of combining positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy and mandibular advancement device (MAD) in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who were pressure intolerant for PAP and were unresponsive to MAD.
This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of severe OSA patients with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 30/hr who were diagnosed between October 1, 2008 and June 30, 2014. Patients were initially treated with 2 weeks of PAP, and those who were intolerant to high-pressure PAP (≥15 cm H2O) were switched to 12 weeks of MAD, which is a monobloc designed at 75% of maximum protrusion. Patients who had high residual AHI (≥15/hr) on MAD underwent 12 weeks of combination therapy (CT) with MAD and CPAP and were enrolled in the present study. Enrolled subjects who completed the 12-week CT were followed-up until June 30, 2016.
A total of 14 male patients were included. All three treatments effectively reduced AHI, oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and total sleep time with SpO2 <90% (% TST-SpO2<90%) compared to pretreatment values. The residual AHI and ODI on CT was lower than that on MAD or PAP. The residual % TST-SpO2<90% was lower than that on MAD and similar to that on PAP. The therapeutic pressure on CT was on average 9.2 cm H2O lower than that on PAP. For the 11 patients who completed CT, only CT reduced ESS compared to pretreatment value. No treatment had significant impact on % slow wave sleep or overnight change of blood pressure. For patients who completed CT, the average usage was 5.9±1.7 hr/night at 12th week and 6.4±1.5 hr/night at a median follow-up of 36.5-months.
Combining MAD and CPAP showed additive effects on reducing AHI and ODI, and lowered the therapeutic pressures.
本研究旨在确定对于重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者,联合气道正压通气(PAP)治疗与下颌前移装置(MAD)的效果,这些患者对PAP不耐受且对MAD无反应。
这项回顾性研究回顾了2008年10月1日至2014年6月30日期间诊断为重度OSA且呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥30次/小时的患者的病历。患者最初接受2周的PAP治疗,那些对高压PAP(≥15 cm H2O)不耐受的患者改为接受12周的MAD治疗,MAD为一体式设计,最大前突量的75%。MAD治疗后AHI残留量高(≥15次/小时)的患者接受12周的MAD与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)联合治疗(CT),并纳入本研究。完成12周CT的入选受试者随访至2016年6月30日。
共纳入14例男性患者。与治疗前值相比,所有三种治疗均有效降低了AHI、氧饱和度下降指数(ODI)以及SpO2<90%的总睡眠时间(%TST-SpO2<90%)。CT治疗后的残留AHI和ODI低于MAD或PAP治疗后的水平。残留的%TST-SpO2<90%低于MAD治疗后的水平,与PAP治疗后的水平相似。CT治疗的压力平均比PAP治疗低9.2 cm H2O。对于完成CT治疗的11例患者,与治疗前值相比,只有CT降低了Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)评分。没有治疗对慢波睡眠百分比或夜间血压变化有显著影响。对于完成CT治疗的患者,第12周时平均使用时间为5.9±1.7小时/晚,在中位随访36.5个月时为6.4±1.5小时/晚。
MAD与CPAP联合使用在降低AHI和ODI方面显示出相加作用,并降低了治疗压力。