Voigt Jeffrey, Carpenter Linda, Leuchter Andrew
Medical Device Consultants of Ridgewood, LLC, Ridgewood, NJ, United States of America.
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186950. eCollection 2017.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) commonly is used for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) after patients have failed to benefit from trials of multiple antidepressant medications. No analysis to date has examined the cost-effectiveness of rTMS used earlier in the course of treatment and over a patients' lifetime.
We used lifetime Markov simulation modeling to compare the direct costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) of rTMS and medication therapy in patients with newly diagnosed MDD (ages 20-59) who had failed to benefit from one pharmacotherapy trial. Patients' life expectancies, rates of response and remission, and quality of life outcomes were derived from the literature, and treatment costs were based upon published Medicare reimbursement data. Baseline costs, aggregate per year quality of life assessments (QALYs), Monte Carlo simulation, tornado analysis, assessment of dominance, and one way sensitivity analysis were also performed. The discount rate applied was 3%.
Lifetime direct treatment costs, and QALYs identified rTMS as the dominant therapy compared to antidepressant medications (i.e., lower costs with better outcomes) in all age ranges, with costs/improved QALYs ranging from $2,952/0.32 (older patients) to $11,140/0.43 (younger patients). One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model was most sensitive to the input variables of cost per rTMS session, monthly prescription drug cost, and the number of rTMS sessions per year.
rTMS was identified as the dominant therapy compared to antidepressant medication trials over the life of the patient across the lifespan of adults with MDD, given current costs of treatment. These models support the use of rTMS after a single failed antidepressant medication trial versus further attempts at medication treatment in adults with MDD.
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)通常用于治疗重度抑郁症(MDD),前提是患者在接受多种抗抑郁药物试验后未能从中获益。迄今为止,尚无分析研究rTMS在治疗早期及患者一生中的成本效益。
我们使用终身马尔可夫模拟模型,比较新诊断为MDD(年龄20 - 59岁)且在一次药物治疗试验中未获益的患者接受rTMS治疗与药物治疗的直接成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。患者的预期寿命、缓解率和缓解情况以及生活质量结果均来自文献,治疗成本基于已公布的医疗保险报销数据。还进行了基线成本、每年总体生活质量评估(QALYs)、蒙特卡洛模拟、龙卷风分析、优势评估和单因素敏感性分析。应用的贴现率为3%。
终身直接治疗成本和QALYs表明,在所有年龄范围内,与抗抑郁药物相比,rTMS是占主导地位的治疗方法(即成本更低且效果更好),成本/改善的QALYs范围从2952美元/0.32(老年患者)到11140美元/0.43(年轻患者)。单因素敏感性分析表明,该模型对每次rTMS治疗的成本、每月处方药成本和每年rTMS治疗次数等输入变量最为敏感。
鉴于当前的治疗成本,在患有MDD的成年人的整个生命周期中,与抗抑郁药物试验相比,rTMS被确定为占主导地位的治疗方法。这些模型支持在一次抗抑郁药物试验失败后使用rTMS,而非对患有MDD的成年人进一步尝试药物治疗。