Barsuk Jeffrey H, Rosen Bradley T, Cohen Elaine R, Feinglass Joe, Ault Mark J
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Cedars- Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2018 Jan 1;13(1):30-33. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2863. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
Paracentesis is a core competency for hospitalists. Using ultrasound for fluid localization is standard practice and involves a low-frequency probe. Experts recommend a "2-probe technique, " which incorporates a high-frequency ultrasound probe in addition to the low-frequency probe to identify blood vessels within the intended needle path. Evidence is currently lacking to support this 2-probe technique, so we performed a pre- to postintervention study to evaluate its effect on paracentesis-related bleeding complications. From February 2010 to August 2011, procedures were performed using only low-frequency probes (preintervention group), while the 2-probe technique was used from September 2011 to February 2016 (postintervention group). A total of 5777 procedures were performed. Paracentesis-related minor bleeding was similar between groups. Major bleeding was lower in the postintervention group (3 [0.3%], n = 1000 vs 4 [0.08%], n = 4777; P = 0.07). This clinically meaningful trend suggests that using the 2-probe technique might prevent paracentesis-related major bleeding.
腹腔穿刺术是住院医师的一项核心技能。使用超声进行液体定位是标准操作,需使用低频探头。专家推荐采用“双探头技术”,即在低频探头之外,增加一个高频超声探头,以识别预期穿刺路径内的血管。目前缺乏支持这种双探头技术的证据,因此我们开展了一项干预前后对照研究,以评估其对腹腔穿刺相关出血并发症的影响。2010年2月至2011年8月期间,仅使用低频探头进行操作(干预前组),而在2011年9月至2016年2月期间采用双探头技术(干预后组)。共进行了5777例操作。两组间腹腔穿刺相关的轻微出血情况相似。干预后组的严重出血发生率较低(1000例中有3例[0.3%],4777例中有4例[0.08%];P = 0.07)。这一具有临床意义的趋势表明,采用双探头技术可能预防腹腔穿刺相关的严重出血。