Scantamburlo Giada, Tziolia Konstantina, Zopf Michaela, Bernardinelli Emanuele, Soyal Selma M, Civello Davide Antonio, Vanoni Simone, Dossena Silvia, Patsch Wolfgang, Patrinos George P, Paulmichl Markus, Nofziger Charity
PharmGenetix Gmbh, Niederalm-Anif, Niederalm-Anif, Austria.
University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, University Campus, Patras, Greece.
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;43(6):2297-2309. doi: 10.1159/000484380. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Accurate genotyping of CYP2D6 is challenging due to its inherent genetic variation, copy number variation (duplications and deletions) and hybrid formation with highly homologous pseudogenes. Because a relatively high percentage (∼25%) of clinically prescribed drugs are substrates for this enzyme, accurate determination of its genotype for phenotype prediction is essential.
A cohort of 365 patient samples was genotyped for CYP2D6 using Sanger sequencing (as the gold standard), hydrolysis probe assays or pyrosequencing.
A discrepant result between the three genotyping methods for the loss of function CYP2D63 (g.2549delA, rs35742686) genetic variant was found in one of the samples. This sample also contained the CYP2D6 g.2470T>C (rs17002852) variation, which had an allele frequency of 2.47% in our cohort. Redesign of the CYP2D63 pyrosequencing and hydrolysis probe assays to avoid CYP2D6 g.2470 corrected the anomaly.
To evidence allele drop out and increase the accuracy of genotyping, intra-patient validation of the same genetic variation with at least two separate methods should be considered.
背景/目的:由于CYP2D6存在固有的基因变异、拷贝数变异(重复和缺失)以及与高度同源的假基因形成杂交体,对其进行准确的基因分型具有挑战性。因为临床上约25%的处方药是该酶的底物,所以准确确定其基因型以预测表型至关重要。
使用桑格测序(作为金标准)、水解探针分析或焦磷酸测序对365例患者样本进行CYP2D6基因分型。
在其中一个样本中发现了功能缺失的CYP2D63(g.2549delA,rs35742686)基因变异在三种基因分型方法之间存在差异结果。该样本还包含CYP2D6 g.2470T>C(rs17002852)变异,在我们的队列中其等位基因频率为2.47%。重新设计CYP2D63焦磷酸测序和水解探针分析以避免CYP2D6 g.2470纠正了异常。
为了证明等位基因缺失并提高基因分型的准确性,应考虑使用至少两种不同方法对同一基因变异进行患者内验证。