Wang Faming, Song Wenfang
Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Honeywell China Co. Ltd., Pudong District, Shanghai 201203, China.
J Therm Biol. 2017 Dec;70(Pt A):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 28.
This study aimed to examine how human body thermophysiologically responds to four commonly used cooling strategies (i.e., electric fan cooling [AirFC], evaporative cooling clothing [EvapCC], hybrid cooling, i.e., evaporative cooling clothing combined with electric fan cooling [EvapCC&AirFC] and liquid cooling clothing [LiqCC]) during heatwaves. An adaptive 'Newton' manikin was used to predict human physiological responses while using these four cooling systems. Four heatwave conditions were selected, i.e., 36°C, 33% RH (hot-dry, denoted as HD1), 36°C, 67% RH (hot-humid, denoted as HH1), 40°C, 27% RH (extremely hot-dry, denoted as HD2) and 40°C, 54% RH (extremely hot-humid, denoted as HH2). A metabolic rate of 2.5 METs was used to mimic moderate work while sitting at either home or outdoors. AirFC was only found to bring cooling benefits in HD1 and HH1. EvapCC was effective in both HD1 and HD2. LiqCC showed similar cooling benefits compared to EvapCC in HD1 and HD2, and also displayed cooling benefits in HH1. EvapCC&AirFC was discovered to be most effective cooling strategy in the four studied conditions. Concerning their practical applications, EvapCC&AirFC was recommended to inactive populations while staying indoors during different heatwave conditions, and EvapCC and LiqCC were more suitable for active populations while working/exercising in hot-dry conditions and hot-humid conditions, respectively.
本研究旨在探讨在热浪期间人体热生理如何对四种常用的降温策略(即电风扇降温[AirFC]、蒸发冷却服装[EvapCC]、混合冷却,即蒸发冷却服装与电风扇冷却相结合[EvapCC&AirFC]以及液体冷却服装[LiqCC])做出反应。使用一个自适应的“牛顿”人体模型来预测在使用这四种冷却系统时的人体生理反应。选择了四种热浪条件,即36°C、33%相对湿度(炎热干燥,记为HD1),36°C、67%相对湿度(炎热潮湿,记为HH1),40°C、27%相对湿度(酷热干燥,记为HD2)和40°C、54%相对湿度(酷热潮湿,记为HH2)。采用2.5代谢当量的代谢率来模拟在家中或户外坐着时的适度工作。仅发现AirFC在HD1和HH1中能带来降温益处。EvapCC在HD1和HD2中均有效。在HD1和HD2中,LiqCC与EvapCC表现出相似的降温益处,且在HH1中也显示出降温益处。发现在四种研究条件下,EvapCC&AirFC是最有效的降温策略。关于它们的实际应用,建议在不同热浪条件下待在室内的非活动人群使用EvapCC&AirFC,而EvapCC和LiqCC分别更适合在炎热干燥条件和炎热潮湿条件下工作/锻炼的活动人群。