Suppr超能文献

客户和咨询师在基于动机的戒烟治疗中的认知复杂性:美国大学样本中偶尔吸烟者的观察性研究。

Cognitive complexity of clients and counsellors during motivation-based treatment for smoking cessation: an observational study on occasional smokers in a US college sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.

School of Public and Community Health Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 25;7(10):e015849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015849.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a widely used and promising treatment approach for aiding in smoking cessation. The present observational study adds to other recent research on why and when MI works by investigating a new potential mechanism: integrative complexity.

SETTING

The study took place in college fraternity and sorority chapters at one large midwestern university.

PARTICIPANTS

Researchers transcribed MI counselling sessions from a previous randomised controlled trial focused on tobacco cessation among college students and subsequently scored clients' and counsellors' discussions across four counselling sessions for integrative complexity.

INTERVENTIONS

This is an observational secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial that tested the effectiveness of MI. We analysed the relationship between integrative complexity and success at quitting smoking in the trial.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Success in quitting smoking:Participants were categorised into two outcome groups (successful quitters vs failed attempters), created based on dichotomous outcomes on two standard variables: (1) self-reported attempts to quit and (2) number of days smoked via timeline follow-back assessment procedures that use key events in participants' lives to prompt their recall of smoking.

RESULTS

We found (1) significantly higher complexity overall for participants who tried to quit but failed compared with successful quitters (standardised β=0.36, p<0.001, (Lower Confidence Interval.)=0.16, (Upper Confidence Interval) =0.47) and (2) the predictive effect of complexity on outcome remains when controlling for standard motivational and demographic variables (partial (102)=-0.23, p=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results suggest that cognitive complexity is uniquely associated with successful quitting in MI controlled trials, and thus may be an important variable to more fully explore during treatment.

摘要

目的

动机访谈(MI)是一种广泛使用且有前途的治疗方法,可帮助戒烟。本观察性研究通过研究一种新的潜在机制——综合复杂性,补充了其他最近关于 MI 为何以及何时有效的研究。

背景

该研究在一所中西部大型大学的大学生联谊会分会中进行。

参与者

研究人员从之前一项针对大学生烟草戒断的随机对照试验中转录了 MI 咨询课程,并随后对四个咨询课程中客户和咨询师的讨论进行了综合复杂性评分。

干预措施

这是对一项随机对照试验的观察性二次分析,该试验测试了 MI 的有效性。我们分析了综合复杂性与试验中戒烟成功之间的关系。

主要和次要结果测量

戒烟成功:根据两个标准变量的二分类结果(1)自我报告的戒烟尝试和(2)通过时间线回溯评估程序评估的吸烟天数,将参与者分为两个结果组(成功戒烟者与戒烟失败者),该程序使用参与者生活中的关键事件来提示他们回忆吸烟情况。

结果

我们发现(1)与成功戒烟者相比,尝试戒烟但失败的参与者的整体复杂性明显更高(标准化β=0.36,p<0.001,下限置信区间为 0.16,上限置信区间为 0.47),(2)当控制标准动机和人口统计学变量时,复杂性对结果的预测作用仍然存在(部分(102)=-0.23,p=0.022)。

结论

总的来说,这些结果表明,认知复杂性与 MI 对照试验中的成功戒烟独特相关,因此可能是治疗过程中需要更充分探索的一个重要变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2879/5665329/8c6968cb19e9/bmjopen-2017-015849f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验