Hayashi Takehiro, Yamashita Taro, Okada Hikari, Nio Kouki, Hara Yasumasa, Nomura Yoshimoto, Hayashi Tomoyuki, Asahina Yoshiro, Yoshida Mariko, Oishi Naoki, Sunagozaka Hajime, Takatori Hajime, Honda Masao, Kaneko Shuichi
Department of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-Machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8641 Japan.
Cancer Cell Int. 2017 Oct 23;17:94. doi: 10.1186/s12935-017-0467-x. eCollection 2017.
The relationship between specific genome alterations and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cancer stem cells (CSCs) remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between somatic mutations and epithelial cell adhesion molecule positive (EpCAM) CSCs.
Two patient-derived HCC samples (HCC1 and HCC2) were sorted by EpCAM expression and analyzed by whole exome sequence. We measured PCDH18 expression level in eight HCC cell lines as well as HCC1 and HCC2 by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. We validated the identified gene mutations in 57 paired of HCC and matched non-cancerous liver tissues by Sanger sequence.
Whole exome sequencing on the sorted EpCAM and EpCAM HCC1 and HCC2 cells revealed 19,263 nonsynonymous mutations in the cording region. We selected mutations that potentially impair the function of the encoded protein. Ultimately, 60 mutations including 13 novel nonsense and frameshift mutations were identified. Among them, mutation was more frequently detected in sorted EpCAM cells than in EpCAM cells in HCC1 by whole exome sequences. However, we could not confirm the difference of mutation frequency between sorted EpCAM and EpCAM cells by Sanger sequencing, indicating that mutation could not explain intracellular heterogeneity. In contrast, we found novel mutations, including c.2556_2557delTG, c.1474C>G, c.2337A>G, and c.2976G>T, were detected in HCC1 and 3/57 (5.3%) additional HCC surgical specimens. All four HCCs with mutations were EpCAM-positive, suggesting that somatic mutations might explain the intertumor heterogeneity of HCCs in terms of the expression status of EpCAM. Furthermore, EpCAM-positive cell lines (Huh1, Huh7, HepG2, and Hep3B) had lower expression than EpCAM-negative cell lines (PLC/PRL/5, HLE, HLF, and SK-Hep-1), and knockdown in HCC2 cells slightly enhanced cell proliferation.
Our data suggest that is functionally suppressed in a subset of EpCAM-positive HCCs through somatic mutations, and may play a role in the development of EpCAM-positive HCCs.
特定基因组改变与肝细胞癌(HCC)癌症干细胞(CSCs)之间的关系仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们评估了体细胞突变与上皮细胞粘附分子阳性(EpCAM)CSCs之间的关系。
通过EpCAM表达对两个患者来源的HCC样本(HCC1和HCC2)进行分选,并通过全外显子组测序进行分析。我们通过实时定量RT-PCR测量了8种HCC细胞系以及HCC1和HCC2中PCDH18的表达水平。我们通过Sanger测序在57对HCC和匹配的非癌肝组织中验证了鉴定出的基因突变。
对分选的EpCAM以及HCC1和HCC2细胞进行全外显子组测序,在编码区发现了19263个非同义突变。我们选择了可能损害编码蛋白功能的突变。最终,鉴定出60个突变,包括13个新的无义突变和移码突变。其中,通过全外显子组测序,在分选的EpCAM细胞中比在HCC1的EpCAM细胞中更频繁地检测到 突变。然而,我们通过Sanger测序无法确认分选的EpCAM和EpCAM细胞之间 突变频率的差异,表明 突变无法解释细胞内的异质性。相反,我们发现新的 突变,包括c.2556_2557delTG、c.1474C>G、c.2337A>G和c.2976G>T,在HCC1和另外3/57(5.3%)的HCC手术标本中被检测到。所有四个具有 突变的HCC均为EpCAM阳性,这表明 体细胞突变可能根据EpCAM的表达状态解释HCC的肿瘤间异质性。此外,EpCAM阳性细胞系(Huh1、Huh7、HepG2和Hep3B)的 表达低于EpCAM阴性细胞系(PLC/PRL/5、HLE、HLF和SK-Hep-1),并且在HCC2细胞中敲低 会轻微增强细胞增殖。
我们的数据表明, 在一部分EpCAM阳性的HCC中通过体细胞突变在功能上受到抑制,并且可能在EpCAM阳性HCC的发生发展中起作用。