Suppr超能文献

餐后低度炎症在大鼠中并不特别需要Toll样受体4(TLR4)激活。

Postprandial low-grade inflammation does not specifically require TLR4 activation in the rat.

作者信息

Hermier Dominique, Mathé Véronique, Lan Annaïg, Santini Clélia, Quignard-Boulangé Annie, Huneau Jean-François, Mariotti François

机构信息

UMR Physiologie de la Nutrition et du Comportement Alimentaire, AgroParisTech, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 16 rue Claude Bernard, F-75005 Paris, France.

出版信息

Nutr Metab (Lond). 2017 Oct 19;14:65. doi: 10.1186/s12986-017-0220-4. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), an innate immune receptor, is suspected to play a key role in the postprandial inflammation that is induced by a high-fat meal rich in saturated fatty acids (SFA). Our objective was to test this hypothesis by using a specific competitive inhibitor of TLR4 (INH) vs vehicle (VEH) administered immediately before a high-SFA meal in rats.

METHODS

First, in a cross-over kinetic study of 12 rats receiving INH and VEH 10 min before the test meal, we measured plasma inflammatory and vascular markers for 6 h. Then, in 20 rats, 3 h after INH or VEH followed by the test meal (parallel study), we measured the mRNA level of a set of cytokines (, , , , ), and of and in the adipose tissue and the liver, and that of adhesion molecules ( and ) in the aorta.

RESULTS

Plasma IL-6 and PAI-1 increased >4-fold at 3-4 h after test-meals, very similarly after INH as compared to VEH. The expression of TLR2 and of all measured cytokine genes in the adipose tissue was dramatically higher after INH (vs VEH). In the liver, gene expression of , , and , was also higher after INH, though more moderately, whereas that of and was similar between groups. INH did not affect mRNA level of and in the aorta.

CONCLUSION

TLR4 activation is not specifically required to mediate systemic postprandial inflammation and we propose that TLR2 and TLR4 exert a dual and interdependent mediation of the postprandial inflammatory response, at least in the adipose tissue.

摘要

背景

Toll样受体4(TLR4)是一种天然免疫受体,被怀疑在富含饱和脂肪酸(SFA)的高脂肪餐后诱导的餐后炎症中起关键作用。我们的目的是通过在大鼠高脂餐前进食前立即使用TLR4特异性竞争性抑制剂(INH)与赋形剂(VEH)对比,来验证这一假设。

方法

首先,在一项交叉动力学研究中,12只大鼠在试验餐前进食前10分钟接受INH和VEH,我们测量了6小时内的血浆炎症和血管标志物。然后,在20只大鼠中,在给予INH或VEH并进食试验餐3小时后(平行研究),我们测量了一组细胞因子(白细胞介素-1β、白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1、白细胞介素-10)、脂肪组织和肝脏中Toll样受体2(TLR2)和Toll样受体4(TLR4)的mRNA水平,以及主动脉中黏附分子(细胞间黏附分子-1和血管细胞黏附分子-1)的mRNA水平。

结果

试验餐后3至4小时,血浆白细胞介素-6和纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1增加了4倍以上,INH组与VEH组相比非常相似。INH组后脂肪组织中TLR2和所有测量的细胞因子基因的表达明显高于VEH组。在肝脏中,INH组后白细胞介素-1β、白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α和单核细胞趋化蛋白-1的基因表达也较高,尽管程度较轻,而白细胞介素-10和TLR4的基因表达在两组之间相似。INH不影响主动脉中细胞间黏附分子-1和血管细胞黏附分子-1的mRNA水平。

结论

介导全身性餐后炎症并非特别需要TLR4激活,我们提出TLR2和TLR4至少在脂肪组织中对餐后炎症反应发挥双重且相互依赖的介导作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验