Osinga Rik, Babst Doris, Bodmer Elvira S, Link Bjoern C, Fritsche Elmar, Hug Urs
Luzerner Kantonsspital, Klinik für Hand- und Plastische Chirurgie, Luzern.
Universitätsspital Basel, Klinik für Plastische, Rekonstruktive, Ästhetische und Handchirurgie, Basel.
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2017 Dec;49(6):399-404. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112747. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
This work assessed both subjective and objective postoperative parameters after breast reduction surgery and compared between patients and plastic surgeons.
After an average postoperative observation period of 6.7 ± 2.7 (2 - 13) years, 159 out of 259 patients (61 %) were examined. The mean age at the time of surgery was 37 ± 14 (15 - 74) years. The postoperative anatomy of the breast and other anthropometric parameters were measured in cm with the patient in an upright position. The visual analogue scale (VAS) values for symmetry, size, shape, type of scar and overall satisfaction both from the patient's and from four plastic surgeons' perspectives were assessed and compared.
Patients rated the postoperative result significantly better than surgeons. Good subjective ratings by patients for shape, symmetry and sensitivity correlated with high scores for overall assessment. Shape had the strongest influence on overall satisfaction (regression coefficient 0.357; p < 0.001), followed by symmetry (regression coefficient 0.239; p < 0.001) and sensitivity (regression coefficient 0.109; p = 0.040) of the breast. The better the subjective rating for symmetry by the patient, the smaller the measured difference of the jugulum-mamillary distance between left and right (regression coefficient -0.773; p = 0.002) and the smaller the difference in height of the lowest part of the breast between left and right (regression coefficient -0.465; p = 0.035). There was no significant correlation between age, weight, height, BMI, resected weight of the breast, postoperative breast size or type of scar with overall satisfaction.
After breast reduction surgery, long-term outcome is rated significantly better by patients than by plastic surgeons. Good subjective ratings by patients for shape, symmetry and sensitivity correlated with high scores for overall assessment. Shape had the strongest influence on overall satisfaction, followed by symmetry and sensitivity of the breast. Postoperative size of the breast, resection weight, type of scar, age or BMI was not of significant influence. Symmetry was the only assessed subjective parameter of this study that could be objectified by postoperative measurements.
本研究评估了乳房缩小术后的主观和客观参数,并对患者和整形外科医生的评估结果进行了比较。
在平均6.7±2.7(2 - 13)年的术后观察期后,对259例患者中的159例(61%)进行了检查。手术时的平均年龄为37±14(15 - 74)岁。让患者直立,以厘米为单位测量乳房的术后解剖结构和其他人体测量参数。从患者和四位整形外科医生的角度评估并比较了视觉模拟量表(VAS)在对称性、大小、形状、瘢痕类型和总体满意度方面的值。
患者对术后结果的评价明显优于外科医生。患者对形状、对称性和敏感度的良好主观评价与总体评估的高分相关。形状对总体满意度的影响最大(回归系数0.357;p < 0.001),其次是乳房的对称性(回归系数0.239;p < 0.001)和敏感度(回归系数0.109;p = 0.040)。患者对对称性的主观评价越好,左右胸骨上切迹 - 乳头距离的测量差异越小(回归系数 -0.773;p = 0.002),左右乳房最低部位高度的差异也越小(回归系数 -0.465;p = 0.035)。年龄、体重、身高、BMI、乳房切除重量、术后乳房大小或瘢痕类型与总体满意度之间无显著相关性。
乳房缩小术后,患者对长期结果的评价明显优于整形外科医生。患者对形状、对称性和敏感度的良好主观评价与总体评估的高分相关。形状对总体满意度的影响最大,其次是乳房的对称性和敏感度。术后乳房大小、切除重量、瘢痕类型、年龄或BMI无显著影响。对称性是本研究中唯一可通过术后测量客观化的评估主观参数。