Suppr超能文献

因药物不良反应而导致的上市后镇痛药撤市:一项系统评价

Post-marketing withdrawal of analgesic medications because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.

作者信息

Onakpoya Igho J, Heneghan Carl J, Aronson Jeffrey K

机构信息

a University of Oxford, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine , Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences , Oxford , UK.

出版信息

Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018 Jan;17(1):63-72. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1398232. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Many analgesics have been withdrawn from the market because of adverse drug reactions. Controversy still surrounds the use of some approved analgesics for pain management. However, the trends and reasons for withdrawal of analgesics when harms are attributed to their use have not been systematically assessed. .

AREAS COVERED

We conducted searches in PubMed; Embase; Google Scholar; clinicaltrials.gov; WHO databases of withdrawn products; websites of the European Medicines Agency, the US Food and Drug Administration, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency; Meyler's Side Effects of Drugs; Stephens' Detection of New Adverse Drug Reactions; the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Encyclopedia; and the Merck Index. We included licensed analgesics that were withdrawn after marketing because of adverse reactions between 1950 and March 2017. We excluded herbal products, non-human medicines, and non-prescription medicines. We used the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine criteria to document the levels of evidence, and chi-squared tests to compare withdrawal patterns across geographical regions.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacovigilance systems in low-resource settings should be strengthened. Greater co-ordination across regulatory authorities in assessing and interpreting the benefit-harm balance of new analgesics should be encouraged. Future reporting of harms in clinical trials of analgesics should follow standardized guidelines.

摘要

引言

许多镇痛药因药物不良反应已退出市场。对于一些已获批用于疼痛管理的镇痛药的使用,争议仍然存在。然而,当镇痛药的使用被认为有害时,其撤市的趋势和原因尚未得到系统评估。

涵盖领域

我们在PubMed、Embase、谷歌学术、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织撤市产品数据库、欧洲药品管理局网站、美国食品药品监督管理局网站、英国药品和医疗产品监管局网站、《梅耶尔药物副作用》、《斯蒂芬斯新药物不良反应检测》、《制药生产百科全书》以及《默克索引》中进行了检索。我们纳入了1950年至2017年3月期间因不良反应在上市后被撤市的已获许可的镇痛药。我们排除了草药产品、非人类用药和非处方药。我们使用牛津循证医学中心的标准来记录证据水平,并使用卡方检验来比较不同地理区域的撤市模式。

专家意见

资源匮乏地区的药物警戒系统应得到加强。应鼓励监管机构之间在评估和解释新镇痛药的利弊平衡方面加强协调。镇痛药临床试验中未来的危害报告应遵循标准化指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验