• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

就地养老:我们的家是一所非常非常好的房子。

Aging in Place: Our House Is a Very, Very, Very Fine House.

作者信息

Wick Jeannette Y

出版信息

Consult Pharm. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):566-574. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2017.566.

DOI:10.4140/TCP.n.2017.566
PMID:29076447
Abstract

As 10,000 American baby boomers turn 65 years of age every day between 2017 and 2030, society needs to help our aging population find ways to handle the restrictions and limitations that come with increasing age: visual impairment, hearing loss, osteoarthritis, dementia, and other conditions common in older adults. Institutional or long-term care for elderly individuals costs an average of $82,000 to $92,000 per person per year and varies by location. Care in an assisted living facility costs $43,500 per person annually. Living in a personal home or residential setting-aging in place-by contrast, costs an average of $23,000 per person per year. Successful aging in place encompasses safety, health, and economic security. Numerous aging-in-place programs exist in contained geographic areas (towns and counties) or in areas that promote community living (e. g., cohousing or homesharing) or focus on special interests like the arts. Two such programs, the naturally occurring retirement community (NORC) model and the Village model, seem to have had the most success. Elderburbs-older, age-unfriendly communities not focused on residents' health care and mobility needs-remain and can present unique problems. Handheld technology or that integrated into housing can improve the standard of living, help elders improve their functioning, and even monitor medication. The aging-in-place movement presents numerous opportunities for consultant pharmacists.

摘要

在2017年至2030年期间,每天有1万名美国婴儿潮一代步入65岁,社会需要帮助我们的老年人口找到应对随着年龄增长而出现的限制和局限的方法:视力障碍、听力丧失、骨关节炎、痴呆症以及老年人常见的其他病症。为老年人提供机构或长期护理的费用平均每人每年8.2万美元至9.2万美元,且因地点而异。在辅助生活设施中的护理费用为每人每年4.35万美元。相比之下,在私人住宅或居住场所养老——就地养老——平均每人每年花费2.3万美元。成功的就地养老包括安全、健康和经济保障。在特定地理区域(城镇和郡县)或促进社区生活的区域(如共同住房或合住房屋),或专注于艺术等特殊兴趣领域,存在许多就地养老项目。其中两个项目,即自然形成的退休社区(NORC)模式和乡村模式,似乎最为成功。老年郊区——那些老旧、对老年人不友好、不关注居民医疗保健和出行需求的社区依然存在,并且可能会带来独特的问题。手持技术或融入住房的技术可以提高生活水平,帮助老年人改善身体机能,甚至监测用药情况。就地养老运动为顾问药师带来了众多机会。

相似文献

1
Aging in Place: Our House Is a Very, Very, Very Fine House.就地养老:我们的家是一所非常非常好的房子。
Consult Pharm. 2017 Oct 1;32(10):566-574. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2017.566.
2
Aging in place: multiple options, multiple choices.
Consult Pharm. 2009 Nov;24(11):804-6, 808, 811-2. doi: 10.4140/tcp.n.2009.804.
3
Preliminary evaluation of medication therapy management services in assisted living facilities in rural Minnesota.明尼苏达州农村辅助生活设施中药物治疗管理服务的初步评估。
Consult Pharm. 2010 May;25(5):305-19. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2010.305.
4
A tale of two community initiatives for promoting aging in place: similarities and differences in the national implementation of NORC programs and villages.两个促进就地老龄化社区计划的故事:NORC 项目和村庄在国家实施中的异同。
Gerontologist. 2013 Dec;53(6):928-38. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt035. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
5
Assisted Living Facilities: The Next Frontier for Consultant Pharmacists.辅助生活设施:顾问药剂师的下一个前沿领域。
Consult Pharm. 2016 Feb;31(2):107-11. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2016.107.
6
Characteristics of residents living in residential care communities, by community bed size: United States, 2012.按社区床位规模划分的居住护理社区居民特征:美国,2012年
NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Nov(171):1-8.
7
Aging in Place of Vulnerable Older Adults: Person-Environment Fit Perspective.弱势老年人就地养老:人-环境适配视角
J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Nov;36(11):1327-1350. doi: 10.1177/0733464815617286. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
8
Enhanced registered nurse care coordination with sensor technology: Impact on length of stay and cost in aging in place housing.借助传感器技术加强注册护士护理协调:对就地养老住房中住院时间和成本的影响。
Nurs Outlook. 2015 Nov-Dec;63(6):650-5. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
9
Transitions to long-term and residential care among older Canadians.加拿大老年人向长期和居住护理的转变。
Health Rep. 2018 May 16;29(5):13-23.
10
Residential care facilities: a key sector in the spectrum of long-term care providers in the United States.寄宿护理机构:美国长期护理服务提供商体系中的一个关键领域。
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Dec(78):1-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and Well-Being Among Those Aging in Place in a Jerusalem Religious Community.耶路撒冷一个宗教社区中居家养老者的健康与幸福状况。
J Relig Health. 2023 Oct;62(5):3137-3157. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01868-7. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
2
Concept development of "Aging in place": Application of hybrid model.“就地养老”的概念发展:混合模型的应用
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Nov;11(11):6646-6653. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2150_21. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
3
Transition of Living Arrangement and Cognitive Impairment Status among Chinese Older Adults: Are They Associated?
中国老年人居住安排转变与认知障碍状况:两者相关吗?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 12;57(9):961. doi: 10.3390/medicina57090961.
4
Healthy Ageing in Place: Enablers and Barriers from the Perspective of the Elderly. A Qualitative Study.健康老龄化:老年人视角下的促成因素和障碍。一项定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;17(18):6451. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186451.
5
Home-Based Cognitively Assistive Robots: Maximizing Cognitive Functioning and Maintaining Independence in Older Adults Without Dementia.居家认知辅助机器人:提高认知功能,使无痴呆的老年成年人保持独立。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jul 13;15:1129-1139. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S253236. eCollection 2020.